Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 448 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22351 Tribe 17-Premier cardinal 1484 31-33 48% 17 FL
22352 Boss CLE 11-2 1484 17-14 55% 11 OH
22353 TC ELITE 15-S 1484 9-8 45% 15 LA
22354 Ridgeline 17 1484 12-25 32% 17 MT
22355 Alpha Omega 14-Regional 1484 6-9 40% 14 MO
22356 HP Illinois 14-Ruby 1484 1-1 33% 14 MO
22357 Michio Chicago 18 Premier 1484 14-15 48% 18 IL
22358 Delaware Juniors 12-Ace 1484 24-20 55% 12 PA
22359 VIPERS 13-Elite 1484 24-24 50% 13 FL
22360 New WaveS 13-Kale 1484 7-5 58% 13 FL
22361 Top Select 13 Select 1484 39-33 54% 13 FL
22362 Juggernaut 16-National 2 1484 25-28 47% 16 CO
22363 Academy 14-E bomberos 1484 18-45 29% 14 IN
22364 DuPage Elite SS 12-Blue 1484 5-5 50% 12 IL
22365 TX Flames 11-Fireballs 1484 1-1 33% 11 TX
22366 AP 11-Lite highlighter 1484 6-4 55% 11 TX
22367 830 VBA 11 1484 8-6 57% 11 TX
22368 ACEEV 16 1484 7-5 58% 16 NY
22369 AVA 16-Premier 3 1484 20-15 57% 16 NY
22370 Goldfish Volleyball Club 17 18U Teal 1484 9-7 56% 17 CO
22371 BOOST 14 Silver 1484 10-16 37% 14 IA
22372 Storm 14-Purple 1484 31-30 50% 14 CO
22373 Delta Juniors 14-2 1484 2-2 50% 14 CO
22374 Elevation 14-Ridgeline 1484 20-25 44% 14 CO
22375 Team Momentum 15-Orange 1484 3-3 50% 15 MO
22376 Alpha Omega 15 National 1484 12-10 55% 15 MO
22377 Mets 10-Andrés 1484 1-4 20% 10 PR
22378 MWVC 10-Janet 1484 3-3 50% 10 PR
22379 LBK 15-3 1484 3-1 75% 15 OH
22380 Hive 15-Black 1484 19-27 41% 15 UT
22381 Salton Sea Starlings 17-2 1484 2-2 50% 17 CA
22382 EMV 16-Black nancy 1484 7-4 64% 16 TX
22383 AVA 18-Girls 1484 5-8 38% 18 HI
22384 Alliance 14-Stream 1484 7-10 39% 14 MA
22385 PVC 12-1 1484 7-7 50% 12 OH
22386 Phoenix 13-Pink 1484 5-6 45% 13 OH
22387 CINCY EAST 13-4 silver 1484 9-10 47% 13 OH
22388 Sunset West 14-Bash 1484 2-3 40% 14 NE
22389 GSVC 16-Black 1484 4-5 44% 16 NH
22390 MI Legends 14-Black 1484 22-18 54% 14 MI
22391 Madtown 13-2 national 1484 24-32 43% 13 WI
22392 Hitters Elite 16 1484 10-5 63% 16 MI
22393 SC Midlands 16-National r 1484 16-37 30% 16 SC
22394 WVC 14 Gold 1484 32-24 57% 14 VA
22395 EVC 15 National 1484 28-23 55% 15 IL
22396 Club 1 15-Royal 1484 22-24 48% 15 IL
22397 AVC Nebraska 16-White 1484 6-8 43% 16 NE
22398 MWS 13-Black 1484 9-11 45% 13 IL
22399 Illini Elite 13-White 1484 9-7 56% 13 IL
22400 OVVC 17-Blue 1484 11-5 69% 17 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.