2025-2026 Season — Page 447 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22301 | EP STRiVE VBC 17-S purple | 1485 | 14-14 | 48% | 17 | TX |
| 22302 | UP North Jr's DSN 15-Navy | 1485 | 8-6 | 57% | 15 | WI |
| 22303 | LHV Girls 15-2 ember | 1485 | 24-28 | 46% | 15 | MA |
| 22304 | Hammerhead 15-1 | 1485 | 21-23 | 48% | 15 | MN |
| 22305 | NYCLI Volleyball Club 18-Elite | 1485 | 14-20 | 41% | 18 | NY |
| 22306 | AVBC 14-T | 1485 | 19-22 | 46% | 14 | FL |
| 22307 | SJVC 14-Blue | 1485 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | FL |
| 22308 | OTVA Volleyball Academy 14-Premier brody/brennan | 1485 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 22309 | EMV 14-National black erin | 1485 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 22310 | AP 14-Lite gray | 1485 | 12-7 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 22311 | Club Xtreme 15-1 | 1485 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | MI |
| 22312 | EPFury 18-1 | 1485 | 5-4 | 56% | 18 | TX |
| 22313 | OCTANE PANTHERS 12U | 1485 | 12-9 | 57% | 12 | NY |
| 22314 | UVC 12 | 1485 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | WA |
| 22315 | RVC VYVL 15-Cat | 1485 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | |
| 22316 | Tribe 13-Premier navy | 1485 | 21-21 | 50% | 13 | FL |
| 22317 | Red Volleyball Club 13 * RED VBC Danielle | 1485 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | CO |
| 22318 | IconVBC 18-Adidas | 1485 | 19-15 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 22319 | GAVBC 15-Black | 1485 | 10-10 | 45% | 15 | |
| 22320 | AVA 13-A bednasz | 1484 | 13-15 | 46% | 13 | OH |
| 22321 | GSVC 15-White | 1484 | 24-21 | 47% | 15 | NH |
| 22322 | JAG VBC 13-2 | 1484 | 10-9 | 53% | 13 | WI |
| 22323 | QC Lancer Scarlet 13-G | 1484 | 2-2 | 40% | 13 | IA |
| 22324 | Keweenaw VBC 12 | 1484 | 4-5 | 44% | 12 | WI |
| 22325 | Big Sky 14-5 | 1484 | 24-12 | 62% | 14 | MT |
| 22326 | Kokoro Volleyball 13-2 | 1484 | 30-24 | 56% | 13 | MN |
| 22327 | Gardiner 14-1 | 1484 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MT |
| 22328 | Gigantes 15-Yempo | 1484 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 22329 | WAVE ALLIANCE 15 SURF | 1484 | 19-19 | 50% | 15 | FL |
| 22330 | OBVC 15 | 1484 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | FL |
| 22331 | SCP 13-Jahni | 1484 | 26-22 | 54% | 13 | SC |
| 22332 | Wimberley AC 12-1 | 1484 | 6-6 | 46% | 12 | TX |
| 22333 | AEV 12 American | 1484 | 16-12 | 57% | 12 | TX |
| 22334 | DIG 12-White | 1484 | 8-7 | 47% | 12 | TX |
| 22335 | LV 12-Thunder | 1484 | 20-19 | 51% | 12 | TX |
| 22336 | ATx Aces White 12 | 1484 | 11-16 | 41% | 12 | TX |
| 22337 | ASVC 13-N1e | 1484 | 31-35 | 47% | 13 | AZ |
| 22338 | Impact 15-Courtney | 1484 | 11-9 | 55% | 15 | MI |
| 22339 | VVB 14-Megan | 1484 | 15-7 | 68% | 14 | GA |
| 22340 | 575 14-Kurt pcvc | 1484 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | GA |
| 22341 | clubSAV 11-Regional | 1484 | 15-11 | 58% | 11 | GA |
| 22342 | Send Me 16-1 | 1484 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | AL |
| 22343 | Adrenaline 17-Kyle | 1484 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | IA |
| 22344 | FCA Force 14-2 ashley | 1484 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | NC |
| 22345 | WC Aces - 16-Clubs | 1484 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | IL |
| 22346 | Instinct 14-Wild black | 1484 | 11-17 | 37% | 14 | TX |
| 22347 | Metro Volleyball Club 16-South fx | 1484 | 24-21 | 50% | 16 | DC |
| 22348 | Highlands County Volleyball Club 14 Blaze | 1484 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | FL |
| 22349 | TiCann 18 | 1484 | 7-6 | 37% | 18 | NY |
| 22350 | MN North 15-2 black | 1484 | 31-20 | 61% | 15 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.