Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 403 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20101 EVRC 12-Faith 1503 14-18 44% 12 IN
20102 Invasion Volleyball Club 12-1 1503 2-2 40% 12 MO
20103 Blaine Juniors 12-1 1503 6-5 55% 12 MN
20104 CSVC 13-1 hoosiers 1503 14-11 56% 13 IN
20105 Summit Volleyball Club 15-White 1503 4-2 67% 15 MO
20106 NNJ 12-Blue 1503 12-6 67% 12 NV
20107 NW Jrs 16-Blue 1503 26-30 46% 16 WA
20108 SPC Volleyball 15-1 1503 8-9 47% 15 FL
20109 Static Volleyball Club G14-1 1503 15-13 54% 14 MO
20110 Nani O Waimea 14-S 1503 1-1 25% 14 HI
20111 FCVBC 14-1 1503 19-10 66% 14 NM
20112 OWV 16-Purple 1503 32-23 58% 16 FL
20113 316VBC 16-2 1503 10-12 43% 16 KS
20114 Dead Frog 12-Ellie 1503 3-2 60% 12 MI
20115 OYA 13-Premier 1503 19-15 56% 13 CA
20116 2Legit 14-blue 1503 2-2 50% 14 FL
20117 SEV 17-1 1503 13-8 62% 17 MN
20118 SR 14-1 1503 10-6 63% 14 MN
20119 Kids America 15-Burton 1503 3-3 50% 15 OH
20120 Reef 13-National george 1503 18-16 53% 13 CA
20121 United Volleyball 14-Blue 1503 8-5 62% 14 NY
20122 MAVS KC 11-4 1503 2-4 33% 11 KS
20123 DE.Club Net 15-1 premier 1503 4-5 36% 15 AR
20124 JET 14-Blast 1503 4-4 40% 14 TX
20125 Avidity 14-Ruby 1503 16-26 38% 14 MA
20126 Liberty 17-Red 1503 5-7 36% 17 TX
20127 Wind 14 1503 3-1 75% 14 OK
20128 Ashland 17-1 1503 3-6 33% 17 NV
20129 Concord 11-Hendricks 1503 2-2 50% 11 IN
20130 MEVC 11-American 1503 2-3 40% 11 MD
20131 ATHENAVB Bend 15-1 gold 1503 22-38 37% 15 OR
20132 TAMPA UNITED VBA 15-Red 1503 41-27 60% 15 FL
20133 SSPVBC 13 1503 4-1 80% 13 MN
20134 Hatchet Volleyball Club 13-Black 1503 5-8 38% 13 IN
20135 Creole Big Apple 15-R 1503 14-12 54% 15 NY
20136 Eastside 11-R benton 1503 2-2 50% 11 OH
20137 CSVB 14-White 1503 19-8 70% 14 MN
20138 RPB 15-Flash 1503 8-4 67% 15 FL
20139 UVA 11-A juniors 1503 8-12 40% 11 CA
20140 JJVA 18-Black 1503 17-21 45% 18 FL
20141 Asphalt Green VBC 15-1 1503 2-1 67% 15 NY
20142 DG Warriors 13-White 1503 10-11 48% 13 OH
20143 Chicago Elite Volleyball Club 11-Grape 1503 5-6 45% 11 IL
20144 K1 Bayamon 15-21 1503 12-10 55% 15 PR
20145 Hustle Volleyball Club 15-Girls legacy 1503 5-4 56% 15 MN
20146 Club Serve 13-White 1503 2-2 50% 13 MO
20147 MAVS KC 12 Premier 1503 12-13 48% 12 KS
20148 Mem Metro 16-Elite red 1503 29-19 60% 16 TN
20149 CALI 12-Blue 1502 18-20 47% 12 NY
20150 Montana Club 16-1 1502 13-32 27% 16 MT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.