2025-2026 Season — Page 403 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20101 | EVRC 12-Faith | 1503 | 14-18 | 44% | 12 | IN |
| 20102 | Invasion Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1503 | 2-2 | 40% | 12 | MO |
| 20103 | Blaine Juniors 12-1 | 1503 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | MN |
| 20104 | CSVC 13-1 hoosiers | 1503 | 14-11 | 56% | 13 | IN |
| 20105 | Summit Volleyball Club 15-White | 1503 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | MO |
| 20106 | NNJ 12-Blue | 1503 | 12-6 | 67% | 12 | NV |
| 20107 | NW Jrs 16-Blue | 1503 | 26-30 | 46% | 16 | WA |
| 20108 | SPC Volleyball 15-1 | 1503 | 8-9 | 47% | 15 | FL |
| 20109 | Static Volleyball Club G14-1 | 1503 | 15-13 | 54% | 14 | MO |
| 20110 | Nani O Waimea 14-S | 1503 | 1-1 | 25% | 14 | HI |
| 20111 | FCVBC 14-1 | 1503 | 19-10 | 66% | 14 | NM |
| 20112 | OWV 16-Purple | 1503 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | FL |
| 20113 | 316VBC 16-2 | 1503 | 10-12 | 43% | 16 | KS |
| 20114 | Dead Frog 12-Ellie | 1503 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | MI |
| 20115 | OYA 13-Premier | 1503 | 19-15 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 20116 | 2Legit 14-blue | 1503 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 20117 | SEV 17-1 | 1503 | 13-8 | 62% | 17 | MN |
| 20118 | SR 14-1 | 1503 | 10-6 | 63% | 14 | MN |
| 20119 | Kids America 15-Burton | 1503 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | OH |
| 20120 | Reef 13-National george | 1503 | 18-16 | 53% | 13 | CA |
| 20121 | United Volleyball 14-Blue | 1503 | 8-5 | 62% | 14 | NY |
| 20122 | MAVS KC 11-4 | 1503 | 2-4 | 33% | 11 | KS |
| 20123 | DE.Club Net 15-1 premier | 1503 | 4-5 | 36% | 15 | AR |
| 20124 | JET 14-Blast | 1503 | 4-4 | 40% | 14 | TX |
| 20125 | Avidity 14-Ruby | 1503 | 16-26 | 38% | 14 | MA |
| 20126 | Liberty 17-Red | 1503 | 5-7 | 36% | 17 | TX |
| 20127 | Wind 14 | 1503 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | OK |
| 20128 | Ashland 17-1 | 1503 | 3-6 | 33% | 17 | NV |
| 20129 | Concord 11-Hendricks | 1503 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | IN |
| 20130 | MEVC 11-American | 1503 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | MD |
| 20131 | ATHENAVB Bend 15-1 gold | 1503 | 22-38 | 37% | 15 | OR |
| 20132 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 15-Red | 1503 | 41-27 | 60% | 15 | FL |
| 20133 | SSPVBC 13 | 1503 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | MN |
| 20134 | Hatchet Volleyball Club 13-Black | 1503 | 5-8 | 38% | 13 | IN |
| 20135 | Creole Big Apple 15-R | 1503 | 14-12 | 54% | 15 | NY |
| 20136 | Eastside 11-R benton | 1503 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | OH |
| 20137 | CSVB 14-White | 1503 | 19-8 | 70% | 14 | MN |
| 20138 | RPB 15-Flash | 1503 | 8-4 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 20139 | UVA 11-A juniors | 1503 | 8-12 | 40% | 11 | CA |
| 20140 | JJVA 18-Black | 1503 | 17-21 | 45% | 18 | FL |
| 20141 | Asphalt Green VBC 15-1 | 1503 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | NY |
| 20142 | DG Warriors 13-White | 1503 | 10-11 | 48% | 13 | OH |
| 20143 | Chicago Elite Volleyball Club 11-Grape | 1503 | 5-6 | 45% | 11 | IL |
| 20144 | K1 Bayamon 15-21 | 1503 | 12-10 | 55% | 15 | PR |
| 20145 | Hustle Volleyball Club 15-Girls legacy | 1503 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | MN |
| 20146 | Club Serve 13-White | 1503 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 20147 | MAVS KC 12 Premier | 1503 | 12-13 | 48% | 12 | KS |
| 20148 | Mem Metro 16-Elite red | 1503 | 29-19 | 60% | 16 | TN |
| 20149 | CALI 12-Blue | 1502 | 18-20 | 47% | 12 | NY |
| 20150 | Montana Club 16-1 | 1502 | 13-32 | 27% | 16 | MT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.