Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 404 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20151 Goldenwest 12-Asics 1502 18-15 55% 12 CA
20152 CLUB 43 12-3 1502 4-4 50% 12 MN
20153 Cannon Falls JO 17-1 1502 11-11 50% 17 MN
20154 VALLEY VENOM 12-1 red 1502 11-18 38% 12 TX
20155 Vernal Velocity 12-Pink 1502 6-7 43% 12 UT
20156 RC Rage 12 April 1502 8-8 50% 12 NC
20157 CW Raptors 17-S 1502 2-2 50% 17 MN
20158 Reinas De La Cancha 13-1 1502 5-5 50% 13 WI
20159 Cajun Elite 12 Abbey 1502 18-15 53% 12 LA
20160 SG Elite 13 Tornado 1502 13-14 48% 13 CA
20161 MJVA 16-Elite gold 1502 20-18 53% 16 TN
20162 Boston United 14-Select - mollie 1502 10-7 59% 14 MA
20163 NSVBC 16-Select black 1502 18-18 50% 16 WI
20164 Apex 16-2 girls 1502 20-40 33% 16 SC
20165 Aspire NW 13-1 empire 1502 9-20 31% 13 OR
20166 LRVA 18-Blue 1502 3-2 60% 18
20167 850 Elite Volleyball Club 14-1 1502 18-26 41% 14 AL
20168 USJVA 13-National red hp 1502 16-24 40% 13 AL
20169 TAVBC 14-Purple 1502 8-7 44% 14 TN
20170 iCrush 12-Black 1502 15-12 52% 12
20171 Winter League 10-3 1502 2-2 50% 10 IL
20172 ECJVC 12-Regional 1502 4-6 40% 12 NC
20173 AAC 12-Local kim 1502 18-7 72% 12 FL
20174 Citrus Fusion 16-Lime 1502 21-15 58% 16 FL
20175 EVA 13 Regional 1502 20-11 65% 13 IL
20176 F5 Sports Complex 16-2 1502 16-14 53% 16 TN
20177 Texas Tornados 14-National 1502 22-28 44% 14 TX
20178 RRS of MS 14-1 maughn 1502 5-4 56% 14 MS
20179 GP 11 State 1502 50-31 62% 11 FL
20180 GRIT 16-Blue 1502 14-16 47% 16 IN
20181 JJVA Club 15-C 1502 6-7 46% 15 FL
20182 Sanford Sports 14-Silver 1502 12-12 50% 14 SD
20183 Tstreet 15-Melissa 1502 5-5 50% 15 CA
20184 Faribault Red 10-1 1502 4-5 44% 10 MN
20185 CSF 12-Black 1502 3-4 43% 12 NC
20186 Belle Plaine 14-Red 1502 5-3 63% 14 MN
20187 IBV 12-10 1502 2-2 50% 12 IN
20188 Next 11-Blue 1502 10-24 29% 11 OH
20189 JAG VBC 16-3 1502 9-7 56% 16 WI
20190 MARIN 13 Slate 1502 33-31 52% 13 CA
20191 CHAOS 18-Elite 1502 24-20 55% 18 OR
20192 Synergy 13-Bolt 1502 20-19 51% 13 PA
20193 SF Juniors 15-Black 1502 18-20 47% 15 CA
20194 Metro Volleyball Club 16-North 1502 26-33 43% 16 DC
20195 Sandhills 15 Charli 1502 11-11 50% 15 NC
20196 Paradigm Uprising 12-S 1502 10-13 36% 12 NY
20197 Iowa Select 12 Reid 1502 13-14 41% 12 IA
20198 CGSV 18-Koller 1502 12-14 46% 18 OH
20199 NYCLBVC 14-White 1502 15-14 52% 14 NJ
20200 Reef 15 Select 1502 22-17 56% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.