2025-2026 Season — Page 405 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20201 | MARIN 13 Slate | 1502 | 33-31 | 52% | 13 | CA |
| 20202 | CHAOS 18-Elite | 1502 | 24-20 | 55% | 18 | OR |
| 20203 | SF Juniors 15-Black | 1502 | 18-20 | 47% | 15 | CA |
| 20204 | Sandhills 15 Charli | 1502 | 11-11 | 50% | 15 | NC |
| 20205 | Synergy 13-Bolt | 1502 | 20-19 | 51% | 13 | PA |
| 20206 | Paradigm Uprising 12-S | 1502 | 10-13 | 36% | 12 | NY |
| 20207 | Mesa Juniors 12-Black | 1502 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | CO |
| 20208 | JAG VBC 16-3 | 1502 | 9-7 | 56% | 16 | WI |
| 20209 | Metro Volleyball Club 16-North | 1502 | 26-33 | 43% | 16 | DC |
| 20210 | Iowa Select 12 Reid | 1502 | 13-14 | 41% | 12 | IA |
| 20211 | CGSV 18-Koller | 1502 | 12-14 | 46% | 18 | OH |
| 20212 | NYCLBVC 14-White | 1502 | 15-14 | 52% | 14 | NJ |
| 20213 | Reef 15 Select | 1502 | 22-17 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 20214 | GSL JO VB 14-S | 1502 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 20215 | CPAC 12-Scotland b | 1502 | 1-0 | 25% | 12 | SD |
| 20216 | Rockwood 10-Navy | 1502 | 23-22 | 49% | 10 | MO |
| 20217 | Cleveland Wave Volleyball Club 12 CWAVE Zell | 1502 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | OH |
| 20218 | PVC 12-1 pink | 1502 | 3-4 | 43% | 12 | NV |
| 20219 | MDJRS 12-Reg black | 1502 | 13-12 | 43% | 12 | MD |
| 20220 | COVC 18 Elite | 1502 | 17-20 | 46% | 18 | OR |
| 20221 | Arsenal 14 Gold | 1502 | 16-26 | 37% | 14 | TX |
| 20222 | Northridge 10-Ann | 1502 | 1-2 | 33% | 10 | IN |
| 20223 | Idaho ONE 13-Navy | 1502 | 15-36 | 27% | 13 | ID |
| 20224 | EliteVBTC 14-Pink | 1502 | 16-14 | 53% | 14 | OH |
| 20225 | Team Colorado 15-N2 | 1502 | 22-29 | 43% | 15 | CO |
| 20226 | Independent 13-Kinney | 1502 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | IN |
| 20227 | Phoenix 14-Pink | 1502 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 20228 | Alamo 11 Elite | 1502 | 22-21 | 50% | 11 | TX |
| 20229 | Lightning 14-1 | 1502 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 20230 | Elevate 13-Blue spring | 1502 | 2-1 | 67% | 13 | IL |
| 20231 | ENVOL 14-1 | 1502 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | PR |
| 20232 | PCVBC 12-Charge | 1502 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | OH |
| 20233 | Diablos 12 10 | 1502 | 3-4 | 43% | 10 | NV |
| 20234 | C-Force VBC 15-1 | 1502 | 9-9 | 50% | 15 | TN |
| 20235 | CFV 15-S | 1502 | 10-7 | 59% | 15 | WI |
| 20236 | ForceVC 15-5 | 1502 | 10-9 | 53% | 15 | OH |
| 20237 | North Shore 12 | 1502 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | HI |
| 20238 | Stacks 14 | 1502 | 17-15 | 45% | 14 | MT |
| 20239 | Stanly Extreme 15 Jim | 1502 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | NC |
| 20240 | Athlete HQ 18-Lawson | 1502 | 21-19 | 53% | 18 | OH |
| 20241 | Champion 18-N purple | 1502 | 31-22 | 58% | 18 | NC |
| 20242 | OVA 12-G elite | 1502 | 35-37 | 49% | 12 | AZ |
| 20243 | Faribault Red 10-1 | 1502 | 4-5 | 44% | 10 | MN |
| 20244 | Idaho ONE 11-White | 1502 | 10-14 | 42% | 11 | ID |
| 20245 | VALLEY VENOM 12-1 red | 1502 | 11-18 | 38% | 12 | TX |
| 20246 | CLUB 43 12-3 | 1502 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 20247 | Chelsea Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1501 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | MI |
| 20248 | Synergy 12-Blizzard | 1501 | 23-24 | 49% | 12 | PA |
| 20249 | CJVA 18-Black | 1501 | 13-20 | 39% | 18 | NJ |
| 20250 | Chaos El Paso 17 Chaos RED | 1501 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.