Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 402 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20051 South Shore Slam 12-S 1504 11-10 52% 12 WI
20052 Athlete HQ 14-Miller 1504 24-19 56% 14 OH
20053 TVVC 16-Coral 1504 18-8 69% 16 OR
20054 RPB 15-Flash 1503 8-4 67% 15 FL
20055 NW Jrs 16-Blue 1503 26-30 46% 16 WA
20056 ALJRS 14 National 1503 21-17 55% 14 AL
20057 MAVS KC 12 Premier 1503 12-13 48% 12 KS
20058 Colibris VBC 14-Velvet 1503 15-10 60% 14 CO
20059 Static Volleyball Club G14-1 1503 15-13 54% 14 MO
20060 Tr1be Volleyball 12 1503 5-4 56% 12 WY
20061 Premier 14-Orange 1503 6-7 43% 14 ND
20062 Club Serve 13-White 1503 2-2 50% 13 MO
20063 Idaho Show 16-2 1503 3-4 43% 16 ID
20064 adidas DYNASTY 16-4 1503 4-1 80% 16 KS
20065 SAVA 15-Blue 1503 29-30 49% 15 KY
20066 Nome VBC 14 1503 4-4 36% 14 AK
20067 Rosemount 12-4 1503 4-4 50% 12 MN
20068 Synergy VBC 16-Cyclone 1503 8-7 47% 16 NY
20069 SEC Elite 17 1503 5-5 50% 17 CO
20070 Chicago Elite Volleyball Club 11-Grape 1503 5-6 45% 11 IL
20071 AJVBC 14 1503 5-5 50% 14 IN
20072 Iowa Impact 15-2 elite 1503 25-40 38% 15 IA
20073 Ohana 17-1 1503 9-7 56% 17 CO
20074 Vision 16-Exv white 1503 12-11 46% 16 TX
20075 MVP 16-Yellow 1503 3-2 60% 16 OH
20076 COLA 14-Grey 1503 2-6 25% 14 CA
20077 PVA Select 13-1 1503 11-5 65% 13 KS
20078 Vancouver Thunder Volleyball Club 15-White 1503 5-4 56% 15
20079 Baker Volleyball Club 12 1503 4-1 80% 12
20080 Monti Club JO 14-2 1503 14-14 48% 14 MN
20081 Ashland 17-1 1503 3-6 33% 17 NV
20082 HF Volleyball 13-1 1503 32-21 59% 13 TN
20083 Landshark 14-Black 1503 10-14 42% 14 KS
20084 DE.Club Net 15-1 premier 1503 4-5 36% 15 AR
20085 C1VB In-House MS 14-Bella 1503 3-2 60% 14 SC
20086 LHV Girls 14-2 blast 1503 31-17 65% 14 MA
20087 AVC 12-Black 1503 13-14 42% 12 TX
20088 STORM 15-Breeana 1503 14-12 54% 15 CA
20089 CKYV 15-1 1503 17-12 59% 15 KY
20090 East Coast Power Chesapeake 18-Black 1503 5-14 26% 18 MD
20091 NSSC 15-White 1503 19-23 43% 15 MO
20092 Vail VBC 12-Black 1503 2-1 50% 12 CO
20093 EVRC 12-Faith 1503 14-18 44% 12 IN
20094 Idaho ONE 10-Elite 1503 6-9 40% 10 ID
20095 Petite Elite 12 Troy 1503 2-3 33% 12 TX
20096 Boss CLE 16-3 1503 10-13 43% 16 OH
20097 Club Apex 13-White 1503 13-12 52% 13 KY
20098 GP 16 State 1503 45-29 61% 16 FL
20099 NNJ 12-Blue 1503 12-6 67% 12 NV
20100 Summit Volleyball Club 15-White 1503 4-2 67% 15 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.