2025-2026 Season — Page 402 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20051 | South Shore Slam 12-S | 1504 | 11-10 | 52% | 12 | WI |
| 20052 | Athlete HQ 14-Miller | 1504 | 24-19 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 20053 | TVVC 16-Coral | 1504 | 18-8 | 69% | 16 | OR |
| 20054 | RPB 15-Flash | 1503 | 8-4 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 20055 | NW Jrs 16-Blue | 1503 | 26-30 | 46% | 16 | WA |
| 20056 | ALJRS 14 National | 1503 | 21-17 | 55% | 14 | AL |
| 20057 | MAVS KC 12 Premier | 1503 | 12-13 | 48% | 12 | KS |
| 20058 | Colibris VBC 14-Velvet | 1503 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | CO |
| 20059 | Static Volleyball Club G14-1 | 1503 | 15-13 | 54% | 14 | MO |
| 20060 | Tr1be Volleyball 12 | 1503 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | WY |
| 20061 | Premier 14-Orange | 1503 | 6-7 | 43% | 14 | ND |
| 20062 | Club Serve 13-White | 1503 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 20063 | Idaho Show 16-2 | 1503 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | ID |
| 20064 | adidas DYNASTY 16-4 | 1503 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | KS |
| 20065 | SAVA 15-Blue | 1503 | 29-30 | 49% | 15 | KY |
| 20066 | Nome VBC 14 | 1503 | 4-4 | 36% | 14 | AK |
| 20067 | Rosemount 12-4 | 1503 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 20068 | Synergy VBC 16-Cyclone | 1503 | 8-7 | 47% | 16 | NY |
| 20069 | SEC Elite 17 | 1503 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | CO |
| 20070 | Chicago Elite Volleyball Club 11-Grape | 1503 | 5-6 | 45% | 11 | IL |
| 20071 | AJVBC 14 | 1503 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | IN |
| 20072 | Iowa Impact 15-2 elite | 1503 | 25-40 | 38% | 15 | IA |
| 20073 | Ohana 17-1 | 1503 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | CO |
| 20074 | Vision 16-Exv white | 1503 | 12-11 | 46% | 16 | TX |
| 20075 | MVP 16-Yellow | 1503 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | OH |
| 20076 | COLA 14-Grey | 1503 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | CA |
| 20077 | PVA Select 13-1 | 1503 | 11-5 | 65% | 13 | KS |
| 20078 | Vancouver Thunder Volleyball Club 15-White | 1503 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | |
| 20079 | Baker Volleyball Club 12 | 1503 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | |
| 20080 | Monti Club JO 14-2 | 1503 | 14-14 | 48% | 14 | MN |
| 20081 | Ashland 17-1 | 1503 | 3-6 | 33% | 17 | NV |
| 20082 | HF Volleyball 13-1 | 1503 | 32-21 | 59% | 13 | TN |
| 20083 | Landshark 14-Black | 1503 | 10-14 | 42% | 14 | KS |
| 20084 | DE.Club Net 15-1 premier | 1503 | 4-5 | 36% | 15 | AR |
| 20085 | C1VB In-House MS 14-Bella | 1503 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | SC |
| 20086 | LHV Girls 14-2 blast | 1503 | 31-17 | 65% | 14 | MA |
| 20087 | AVC 12-Black | 1503 | 13-14 | 42% | 12 | TX |
| 20088 | STORM 15-Breeana | 1503 | 14-12 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 20089 | CKYV 15-1 | 1503 | 17-12 | 59% | 15 | KY |
| 20090 | East Coast Power Chesapeake 18-Black | 1503 | 5-14 | 26% | 18 | MD |
| 20091 | NSSC 15-White | 1503 | 19-23 | 43% | 15 | MO |
| 20092 | Vail VBC 12-Black | 1503 | 2-1 | 50% | 12 | CO |
| 20093 | EVRC 12-Faith | 1503 | 14-18 | 44% | 12 | IN |
| 20094 | Idaho ONE 10-Elite | 1503 | 6-9 | 40% | 10 | ID |
| 20095 | Petite Elite 12 Troy | 1503 | 2-3 | 33% | 12 | TX |
| 20096 | Boss CLE 16-3 | 1503 | 10-13 | 43% | 16 | OH |
| 20097 | Club Apex 13-White | 1503 | 13-12 | 52% | 13 | KY |
| 20098 | GP 16 State | 1503 | 45-29 | 61% | 16 | FL |
| 20099 | NNJ 12-Blue | 1503 | 12-6 | 67% | 12 | NV |
| 20100 | Summit Volleyball Club 15-White | 1503 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.