Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 401 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20001 ELITE NEXT LEVEL 14-1 1504 14-10 58% 14 TX
20002 Titans 15 1504 11-9 46% 15 VA
20003 West E 13-Purple 1504 9-6 60% 13 PA
20004 Alpha 14-2 1504 30-38 44% 14 KY
20005 Amarillo Xtreme 12-Storm 1504 9-10 47% 12 TX
20006 IVBA 14-Black 1504 18-21 46% 14 MS
20007 TX IMPACT 10-1 navy 1504 3-3 38% 10 TX
20008 Top Flight 13-Gamma sp 1504 3-4 43% 13 IL
20009 BAE 17-1 1504 2-5 29% 17 NV
20010 KVBC 17-S 1504 24-22 52% 17 MN
20011 SURGE 17-Orange 1504 14-47 23% 17 RI
20012 MVC Elite 15-1 1504 12-9 57% 15 AR
20013 BRUSA 14-Tracy 1504 18-16 53% 14 CA
20014 DVC 12-Volt 1504 7-7 50% 12 OH
20015 OKC Ignite VBC 18-S 1504 1-1 50% 18 OK
20016 Kindred Vikings 14 Kindred Vikings (NO) 1504 10-9 48% 14
20017 Star Valley Lady Legends 12 Lady Legends 12&13 1504 2-2 33% 12 WY
20018 Utah Ice Volleyball Club 16 Utah Ice Jarrod 1504 2-3 40% 16 UT
20019 REBELS 15 1504 3-2 60% 15 ON
20020 573 15-Regional l 1504 6-9 40% 15 MO
20021 Black Swamp 17-1 1504 12-20 38% 17 OH
20022 Refine 13 Refine Roussell 1504 3-1 60% 13 AL
20023 OTS 14-1 purple 1504 4-2 67% 14 FL
20024 MARIN 12-Green 1504 23-32 42% 12 CA
20025 Athlete HQ 14-Miller 1504 24-19 56% 14 OH
20026 NITRO 11-Blue 1504 19-25 43% 11 TX
20027 JJVA 15-Black 1504 28-43 39% 15 FL
20028 Club Wave 17 1504 1-1 25% 17 MO
20029 Momentum Volleyball Club 15-Madison 1504 3-4 43% 15 AZ
20030 Surry Storm Volleyball Club 14 SSVC Blue (CR) 1504 3-2 60% 14 NC
20031 Shonto Starlings 14-S pink 1504 17-13 53% 14 AZ
20032 Top Notch 12-Black 1504 5-5 50% 12 MO
20033 Iowa United 11 1504 3-2 43% 11 IA
20034 CG 12-Blue 1504 4-4 50% 12 WA
20035 LJVBC 11-1 1504 2-3 40% 11 KS
20036 Kokoro Volleyball 14-3 1504 40-26 61% 14 MN
20037 Mahoning Valley Premier VBC 14-Black 1504 3-2 60% 14 OH
20038 Starlings Lynwood 14-S franky 1504 5-3 63% 14 CA
20039 Texas Storm 14-Black 1504 10-10 50% 14 TX
20040 TVS 10 Kayla 1504 3-3 43% 10 TX
20041 PVA 13 MOLTEN 1504 13-15 46% 13 MO
20042 Crystal City Volleyball Club 14 CRYSTAL CITY PEARLS (WE) 1504 4-4 36% 14 NY
20043 Quicksets 14-2 1504 2-1 67% 14 HI
20044 Independent 10-Burks 1504 2-1 67% 10 IN
20045 North Coast 17-Orange 1504 15-15 50% 17 CA
20046 NOH 10-Blue 1504 2-3 40% 10 OH
20047 Vision 16-1 1504 30-18 63% 16 TX
20048 COA 12-Lightning 1504 13-12 52% 12 IN
20049 SA Empire 14 Select 1504 13-9 52% 14 TX
20050 Alamo 12-Gold 1 1504 24-26 47% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.