2025-2026 Season — Page 400 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19951 | Black Canyon 16-Emily | 1504 | 15-12 | 52% | 16 | CO |
| 19952 | Plymouth Volleyball Club 12 | 1504 | 7-8 | 47% | 12 | IN |
| 19953 | South Volley 18-Tali | 1504 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | PR |
| 19954 | MARIN 12-Green | 1504 | 23-32 | 42% | 12 | CA |
| 19955 | MVA 12-Regional | 1504 | 12-11 | 48% | 12 | MD |
| 19956 | FINESSE VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY 11-1 | 1504 | 17-17 | 49% | 11 | MO |
| 19957 | Net Force 14-2 legacy | 1504 | 15-16 | 47% | 14 | IA |
| 19958 | Heat 15 Ignite | 1504 | 12-13 | 48% | 15 | WI |
| 19959 | Top Notch 14-Nike | 1504 | 12-16 | 43% | 14 | MO |
| 19960 | SOL 12-2 | 1504 | 13-11 | 46% | 12 | TX |
| 19961 | AIVA Armstrong 16 | 1504 | 7-8 | 47% | 16 | PA |
| 19962 | Surge 16-Lime | 1504 | 13-12 | 48% | 16 | PA |
| 19963 | NMBVB 14-Odi | 1504 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | FL |
| 19964 | Synergy 11-Schroeder | 1504 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | OH |
| 19965 | KNVBC 16-Chaos | 1504 | 7-9 | 44% | 16 | KS |
| 19966 | Ohio Xtreme 12 | 1504 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | OH |
| 19967 | TORCH 16-Naima | 1504 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 19968 | 26' Red Cedar Elite 16 | 1504 | 30-24 | 56% | 16 | WI |
| 19969 | MHE 12-Green | 1504 | 1-1 | 25% | 12 | ND |
| 19970 | Roughriders 18-1 | 1504 | 8-8 | 50% | 18 | MA |
| 19971 | ATHENA VB 14-6 white regional | 1504 | 20-19 | 51% | 14 | OR |
| 19972 | C1VB 17-Elite grvl | 1504 | 18-19 | 49% | 17 | SC |
| 19973 | Independent 12-Hummel | 1504 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | IN |
| 19974 | MOVSelect 12-Black | 1504 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | OH |
| 19975 | Bootheel SMASH 16-G | 1504 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | MO |
| 19976 | HNL Volleyball 15-Blue | 1504 | 15-16 | 48% | 15 | HI |
| 19977 | HOVA 16-A black | 1504 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | OH |
| 19978 | Rapid Fire 11-White | 1504 | 11-9 | 55% | 11 | IL |
| 19979 | TX IMPACT 10-1 navy | 1504 | 3-3 | 38% | 10 | TX |
| 19980 | NIVB 13-Black | 1504 | 19-23 | 42% | 13 | MN |
| 19981 | Fever 18 | 1504 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | NV |
| 19982 | Coastal Bend Juniors 17 Wave | 1504 | 20-13 | 54% | 17 | TX |
| 19983 | VC United 12-1 premier | 1504 | 11-11 | 50% | 12 | IL |
| 19984 | SVC 13 Steel | 1504 | 11-8 | 58% | 13 | IA |
| 19985 | 1United 15-Elite blue | 1504 | 23-18 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 19986 | Utah Ice Volleyball Club 16 Utah Ice Jarrod | 1504 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | UT |
| 19987 | NIVA 12-Yellow | 1504 | 17-9 | 65% | 12 | IN |
| 19988 | TVVC 16-Coral | 1504 | 18-8 | 69% | 16 | OR |
| 19989 | FPVC 14-Ella | 1504 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 19990 | NF PIRATES 15-Gold | 1504 | 25-15 | 63% | 15 | FL |
| 19991 | Ida Bay 14 | 1504 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | WI |
| 19992 | River City 14-Black | 1504 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 19993 | CEV 14U | 1504 | 16-11 | 59% | 14 | FL |
| 19994 | Ho'omau 16-Kea | 1504 | 25-27 | 48% | 16 | HI |
| 19995 | TC ELITE 14-B | 1504 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | LA |
| 19996 | SV Chargers 15 | 1504 | 28-14 | 54% | 15 | NY |
| 19997 | ELITE NEXT LEVEL 14-1 | 1504 | 14-10 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 19998 | West E 13-Purple | 1504 | 9-6 | 60% | 13 | PA |
| 19999 | Show 14-Gabby | 1504 | 19-18 | 51% | 14 | ID |
| 20000 | Top Flight 13-Gamma sp | 1504 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.