Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 400 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19951 Black Canyon 16-Emily 1504 15-12 52% 16 CO
19952 Plymouth Volleyball Club 12 1504 7-8 47% 12 IN
19953 South Volley 18-Tali 1504 4-2 67% 18 PR
19954 MARIN 12-Green 1504 23-32 42% 12 CA
19955 MVA 12-Regional 1504 12-11 48% 12 MD
19956 FINESSE VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY 11-1 1504 17-17 49% 11 MO
19957 Net Force 14-2 legacy 1504 15-16 47% 14 IA
19958 Heat 15 Ignite 1504 12-13 48% 15 WI
19959 Top Notch 14-Nike 1504 12-16 43% 14 MO
19960 SOL 12-2 1504 13-11 46% 12 TX
19961 AIVA Armstrong 16 1504 7-8 47% 16 PA
19962 Surge 16-Lime 1504 13-12 48% 16 PA
19963 NMBVB 14-Odi 1504 4-1 80% 14 FL
19964 Synergy 11-Schroeder 1504 2-2 50% 11 OH
19965 KNVBC 16-Chaos 1504 7-9 44% 16 KS
19966 Ohio Xtreme 12 1504 2-2 50% 12 OH
19967 TORCH 16-Naima 1504 18-26 41% 16 CA
19968 26' Red Cedar Elite 16 1504 30-24 56% 16 WI
19969 MHE 12-Green 1504 1-1 25% 12 ND
19970 Roughriders 18-1 1504 8-8 50% 18 MA
19971 ATHENA VB 14-6 white regional 1504 20-19 51% 14 OR
19972 C1VB 17-Elite grvl 1504 18-19 49% 17 SC
19973 Independent 12-Hummel 1504 2-2 50% 12 IN
19974 MOVSelect 12-Black 1504 3-1 75% 12 OH
19975 Bootheel SMASH 16-G 1504 3-4 43% 16 MO
19976 HNL Volleyball 15-Blue 1504 15-16 48% 15 HI
19977 HOVA 16-A black 1504 3-2 60% 16 OH
19978 Rapid Fire 11-White 1504 11-9 55% 11 IL
19979 TX IMPACT 10-1 navy 1504 3-3 38% 10 TX
19980 NIVB 13-Black 1504 19-23 42% 13 MN
19981 Fever 18 1504 10-8 56% 18 NV
19982 Coastal Bend Juniors 17 Wave 1504 20-13 54% 17 TX
19983 VC United 12-1 premier 1504 11-11 50% 12 IL
19984 SVC 13 Steel 1504 11-8 58% 13 IA
19985 1United 15-Elite blue 1504 23-18 53% 15 TX
19986 Utah Ice Volleyball Club 16 Utah Ice Jarrod 1504 2-3 40% 16 UT
19987 NIVA 12-Yellow 1504 17-9 65% 12 IN
19988 TVVC 16-Coral 1504 18-8 69% 16 OR
19989 FPVC 14-Ella 1504 8-7 53% 14 CA
19990 NF PIRATES 15-Gold 1504 25-15 63% 15 FL
19991 Ida Bay 14 1504 3-2 60% 14 WI
19992 River City 14-Black 1504 17-12 59% 14 WI
19993 CEV 14U 1504 16-11 59% 14 FL
19994 Ho'omau 16-Kea 1504 25-27 48% 16 HI
19995 TC ELITE 14-B 1504 8-7 53% 14 LA
19996 SV Chargers 15 1504 28-14 54% 15 NY
19997 ELITE NEXT LEVEL 14-1 1504 14-10 58% 14 TX
19998 West E 13-Purple 1504 9-6 60% 13 PA
19999 Show 14-Gabby 1504 19-18 51% 14 ID
20000 Top Flight 13-Gamma sp 1504 3-4 43% 13 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.