Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 399 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19901 BEAST ATHLETICS 14 GOLD 1505 20-14 54% 14 TX
19902 Ne Jrs 13-Red 1505 13-6 68% 13 NE
19903 CVA 17 Navy 1505 31-28 53% 17 CO
19904 Reef 17-National dk 1505 33-29 53% 17 CA
19905 Uno Girls 17-National 1505 1-1 50% 17 IL
19906 Dynamite 16-Premier 1505 23-13 64% 16 MI
19907 Palm Beach Jrs 12-1 1505 10-8 56% 12 FL
19908 DigThis! Ohana 14-Black 1505 3-3 50% 14 NV
19909 Shock 13-Ua spark 1505 19-16 54% 13 IL
19910 Club Fusion 17-Heat 1505 3-2 60% 17 IL
19911 Wisconsin Blaze 15-Red 1505 18-21 46% 15 WI
19912 TVC 14-A-p isa 1505 13-23 36% 14 FL
19913 Mid-Mich ACES 17 Regional 1505 20-21 49% 17 MI
19914 TCVA 15-Black adidas 1505 30-33 48% 15 TX
19915 Zuma Bay 14-Riptide 1505 14-14 50% 14 CA
19916 Slam VBC 14-Gold 1505 11-5 69% 14 WI
19917 Point Break VBC 16 Danny 1505 16-11 59% 16 CA
19918 Rogue 12-White 1505 5-5 50% 12 OH
19919 LAVA 11-1 1505 5-6 45% 11 OH
19920 BVB 10 1505 5-3 63% 10 MN
19921 Elevate VC 18 Maggie 1505 26-21 55% 18 NV
19922 Nestor 12-Ruben 1505 4-4 50% 12 CA
19923 HAVC 14-W blue 1505 2-2 50% 14 SD
19924 NE D-League 17 1505 9-8 53% 17 IA
19925 85 South VBC 15-Red 1505 17-10 63% 15 GA
19926 Mountain Crush 14 1505 16-4 80% 14 AZ
19927 Ut Bounce 13 1505 17-10 47% 13 UT
19928 Domination 13-I 1505 9-7 56% 13 MI
19929 FBK 15-Black 1505 32-28 53% 15 AZ
19930 Hunter's 11-Red 1505 25-17 60% 11 FL
19931 Iowa Vibe 14-4 pulse 1505 6-8 33% 14 IA
19932 417 Juniors 18-2 1505 3-3 43% 18 MO
19933 Foothills 12-Black 1505 25-24 51% 12 WA
19934 HPRIME 12-Gold 1505 14-11 56% 12 TX
19935 SA Empire 14 Select 1504 13-9 52% 14 TX
19936 IVBA 14-Black 1504 18-21 46% 14 MS
19937 River City 14-Black 1504 17-12 59% 14 WI
19938 Legacy KY 15-Black 1504 51-51 50% 15 KY
19939 FMTVA 15-Purple 1504 28-21 57% 15 TX
19940 South Shore Slam 12-S 1504 11-10 52% 12 WI
19941 Vision 16-1 1504 30-18 63% 16 TX
19942 MHE 12-Green 1504 1-1 25% 12 ND
19943 NF PIRATES 15-Gold 1504 25-15 63% 15 FL
19944 VC United 12-1 premier 1504 11-11 50% 12 IL
19945 FPVC 14-Ella 1504 8-7 53% 14 CA
19946 OTS 14-1 purple 1504 4-2 67% 14 FL
19947 CG 12-Blue 1504 4-4 50% 12 WA
19948 PREVAIL Girls 15-Purple 1504 6-9 40% 15 PA
19949 AMP 16 1504 2-2 40% 16 HI
19950 SERVE VBC 14-1 1504 11-8 58% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.