2025-2026 Season — Page 399 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19901 | BEAST ATHLETICS 14 GOLD | 1505 | 20-14 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 19902 | Ne Jrs 13-Red | 1505 | 13-6 | 68% | 13 | NE |
| 19903 | CVA 17 Navy | 1505 | 31-28 | 53% | 17 | CO |
| 19904 | Reef 17-National dk | 1505 | 33-29 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 19905 | Uno Girls 17-National | 1505 | 1-1 | 50% | 17 | IL |
| 19906 | Dynamite 16-Premier | 1505 | 23-13 | 64% | 16 | MI |
| 19907 | Palm Beach Jrs 12-1 | 1505 | 10-8 | 56% | 12 | FL |
| 19908 | DigThis! Ohana 14-Black | 1505 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | NV |
| 19909 | Shock 13-Ua spark | 1505 | 19-16 | 54% | 13 | IL |
| 19910 | Club Fusion 17-Heat | 1505 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 19911 | Wisconsin Blaze 15-Red | 1505 | 18-21 | 46% | 15 | WI |
| 19912 | TVC 14-A-p isa | 1505 | 13-23 | 36% | 14 | FL |
| 19913 | Mid-Mich ACES 17 Regional | 1505 | 20-21 | 49% | 17 | MI |
| 19914 | TCVA 15-Black adidas | 1505 | 30-33 | 48% | 15 | TX |
| 19915 | Zuma Bay 14-Riptide | 1505 | 14-14 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 19916 | Slam VBC 14-Gold | 1505 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 19917 | Point Break VBC 16 Danny | 1505 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 19918 | Rogue 12-White | 1505 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | OH |
| 19919 | LAVA 11-1 | 1505 | 5-6 | 45% | 11 | OH |
| 19920 | BVB 10 | 1505 | 5-3 | 63% | 10 | MN |
| 19921 | Elevate VC 18 Maggie | 1505 | 26-21 | 55% | 18 | NV |
| 19922 | Nestor 12-Ruben | 1505 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 19923 | HAVC 14-W blue | 1505 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | SD |
| 19924 | NE D-League 17 | 1505 | 9-8 | 53% | 17 | IA |
| 19925 | 85 South VBC 15-Red | 1505 | 17-10 | 63% | 15 | GA |
| 19926 | Mountain Crush 14 | 1505 | 16-4 | 80% | 14 | AZ |
| 19927 | Ut Bounce 13 | 1505 | 17-10 | 47% | 13 | UT |
| 19928 | Domination 13-I | 1505 | 9-7 | 56% | 13 | MI |
| 19929 | FBK 15-Black | 1505 | 32-28 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 19930 | Hunter's 11-Red | 1505 | 25-17 | 60% | 11 | FL |
| 19931 | Iowa Vibe 14-4 pulse | 1505 | 6-8 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 19932 | 417 Juniors 18-2 | 1505 | 3-3 | 43% | 18 | MO |
| 19933 | Foothills 12-Black | 1505 | 25-24 | 51% | 12 | WA |
| 19934 | HPRIME 12-Gold | 1505 | 14-11 | 56% | 12 | TX |
| 19935 | SA Empire 14 Select | 1504 | 13-9 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 19936 | IVBA 14-Black | 1504 | 18-21 | 46% | 14 | MS |
| 19937 | River City 14-Black | 1504 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 19938 | Legacy KY 15-Black | 1504 | 51-51 | 50% | 15 | KY |
| 19939 | FMTVA 15-Purple | 1504 | 28-21 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 19940 | South Shore Slam 12-S | 1504 | 11-10 | 52% | 12 | WI |
| 19941 | Vision 16-1 | 1504 | 30-18 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 19942 | MHE 12-Green | 1504 | 1-1 | 25% | 12 | ND |
| 19943 | NF PIRATES 15-Gold | 1504 | 25-15 | 63% | 15 | FL |
| 19944 | VC United 12-1 premier | 1504 | 11-11 | 50% | 12 | IL |
| 19945 | FPVC 14-Ella | 1504 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 19946 | OTS 14-1 purple | 1504 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | FL |
| 19947 | CG 12-Blue | 1504 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | WA |
| 19948 | PREVAIL Girls 15-Purple | 1504 | 6-9 | 40% | 15 | PA |
| 19949 | AMP 16 | 1504 | 2-2 | 40% | 16 | HI |
| 19950 | SERVE VBC 14-1 | 1504 | 11-8 | 58% | 14 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.