Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 398 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19851 FC Elite 16-Blue 1505 25-28 47% 16 WI
19852 Southern Storm 15 Ice 1505 19-22 46% 15 TN
19853 LHVA 15-Black 1505 6-4 60% 15 NY
19854 Princeton Volleyball Club 16 1505 22-12 65% 16 NJ
19855 LVL UP 12 Gold 1505 28-16 64% 12 AZ
19856 KC Impact Volleyball Club 14-1 1505 10-8 45% 14
19857 Atomic! 16-Rebecca 1505 4-3 50% 16 MI
19858 Blue Banner BBV 15-Abby 1505 20-24 45% 15 CA
19859 Tsunami 10-1e trina 1505 15-10 60% 10 GA
19860 Stars 12-Silver 1505 6-2 46% 12 ND
19861 American 12-Blue 1505 21-23 46% 12 VA
19862 417 MoJrs 12-Reg black 1505 4-4 40% 12 MO
19863 MVA 15-Rebekah 1505 34-31 52% 15 FL
19864 MILOLI'I-KA'U 14 1505 2-2 50% 14 HI
19865 Starling West Tucson 14-White 1505 19-10 66% 14 AZ
19866 Quandomania Girls 16 1505 16-18 47% 16 NJ
19867 Ark Volley 15-National 1505 49-24 67% 15 AR
19868 Laguna Niguel Breakers 13-2 1505 21-20 51% 13 CA
19869 A5 13 James 1505 36-31 54% 13 GA
19870 Chatuge Shores 17-Black 1505 10-31 24% 17 GA
19871 Wranglers VBC 14-1 1505 3-2 60% 14 MI
19872 APEX1 17-Green 1505 24-32 43% 17 CA
19873 Force VC 14-6 1505 7-8 47% 14 OH
19874 Victory Volleyball LP 18-1 1505 13-13 50% 18 MN
19875 Princeton 12-1 1505 7-10 41% 12 NJ
19876 Santa Monica 16-Adidas premier 1505 15-17 47% 16 CA
19877 SW Spikers 15-Faulkner 1505 2-2 50% 15 WI
19878 Spartan Wave 14-1 1505 7-8 47% 14 MN
19879 RVA G12-Pink 1505 23-19 55% 12 WI
19880 Club South 12-1 1505 14-13 52% 12 TX
19881 Zoo City 15 Grizzlies 1505 193-117 62% all NC
19882 Hard Hitters 15-Ub 1505 13-10 52% 15 TX
19883 Foothill Volleyball Club 13-Red 1505 20-21 49% 13 CA
19884 BVA 14-National brooke 1505 1-5 17% 14 MN
19885 Rancho 14-Gold 1505 16-16 50% 14 CA
19886 Club 801 12-Club gabe 1505 13-6 59% 12 UT
19887 Actyve 15-Blue 1505 22-20 52% 15 CA
19888 Club Ace 13 1505 17-12 59% 13 OK
19889 Atlas Volleyball club 15 Atlas Navy 1505 16-16 47% 15 PA
19890 BEAST ATHLETICS 14 GOLD 1505 20-14 54% 14 TX
19891 Ne Jrs 13-Red 1505 13-6 68% 13 NE
19892 CVA 17 Navy 1505 31-28 53% 17 CO
19893 Platinum 14-Apex 1505 15-24 36% 14 UT
19894 Reef 17-National dk 1505 33-29 53% 17 CA
19895 Uno Girls 17-National 1505 1-1 50% 17 IL
19896 Zuma Bay 14-Riptide 1505 14-14 50% 14 CA
19897 DigThis! Ohana 14-Black 1505 3-3 50% 14 NV
19898 Shock 13-Ua spark 1505 19-16 54% 13 IL
19899 Club Fusion 17-Heat 1505 3-2 60% 17 IL
19900 Wisconsin Blaze 15-Red 1505 18-21 46% 15 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.