2025-2026 Season — Page 398 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19851 | FC Elite 16-Blue | 1505 | 25-28 | 47% | 16 | WI |
| 19852 | Southern Storm 15 Ice | 1505 | 19-22 | 46% | 15 | TN |
| 19853 | LHVA 15-Black | 1505 | 6-4 | 60% | 15 | NY |
| 19854 | Princeton Volleyball Club 16 | 1505 | 22-12 | 65% | 16 | NJ |
| 19855 | LVL UP 12 Gold | 1505 | 28-16 | 64% | 12 | AZ |
| 19856 | KC Impact Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1505 | 10-8 | 45% | 14 | |
| 19857 | Atomic! 16-Rebecca | 1505 | 4-3 | 50% | 16 | MI |
| 19858 | Blue Banner BBV 15-Abby | 1505 | 20-24 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 19859 | Tsunami 10-1e trina | 1505 | 15-10 | 60% | 10 | GA |
| 19860 | Stars 12-Silver | 1505 | 6-2 | 46% | 12 | ND |
| 19861 | American 12-Blue | 1505 | 21-23 | 46% | 12 | VA |
| 19862 | 417 MoJrs 12-Reg black | 1505 | 4-4 | 40% | 12 | MO |
| 19863 | MVA 15-Rebekah | 1505 | 34-31 | 52% | 15 | FL |
| 19864 | MILOLI'I-KA'U 14 | 1505 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | HI |
| 19865 | Starling West Tucson 14-White | 1505 | 19-10 | 66% | 14 | AZ |
| 19866 | Quandomania Girls 16 | 1505 | 16-18 | 47% | 16 | NJ |
| 19867 | Ark Volley 15-National | 1505 | 49-24 | 67% | 15 | AR |
| 19868 | Laguna Niguel Breakers 13-2 | 1505 | 21-20 | 51% | 13 | CA |
| 19869 | A5 13 James | 1505 | 36-31 | 54% | 13 | GA |
| 19870 | Chatuge Shores 17-Black | 1505 | 10-31 | 24% | 17 | GA |
| 19871 | Wranglers VBC 14-1 | 1505 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | MI |
| 19872 | APEX1 17-Green | 1505 | 24-32 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 19873 | Force VC 14-6 | 1505 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | OH |
| 19874 | Victory Volleyball LP 18-1 | 1505 | 13-13 | 50% | 18 | MN |
| 19875 | Princeton 12-1 | 1505 | 7-10 | 41% | 12 | NJ |
| 19876 | Santa Monica 16-Adidas premier | 1505 | 15-17 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 19877 | SW Spikers 15-Faulkner | 1505 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | WI |
| 19878 | Spartan Wave 14-1 | 1505 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | MN |
| 19879 | RVA G12-Pink | 1505 | 23-19 | 55% | 12 | WI |
| 19880 | Club South 12-1 | 1505 | 14-13 | 52% | 12 | TX |
| 19881 | Zoo City 15 Grizzlies | 1505 | 193-117 | 62% | all | NC |
| 19882 | Hard Hitters 15-Ub | 1505 | 13-10 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 19883 | Foothill Volleyball Club 13-Red | 1505 | 20-21 | 49% | 13 | CA |
| 19884 | BVA 14-National brooke | 1505 | 1-5 | 17% | 14 | MN |
| 19885 | Rancho 14-Gold | 1505 | 16-16 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 19886 | Club 801 12-Club gabe | 1505 | 13-6 | 59% | 12 | UT |
| 19887 | Actyve 15-Blue | 1505 | 22-20 | 52% | 15 | CA |
| 19888 | Club Ace 13 | 1505 | 17-12 | 59% | 13 | OK |
| 19889 | Atlas Volleyball club 15 Atlas Navy | 1505 | 16-16 | 47% | 15 | PA |
| 19890 | BEAST ATHLETICS 14 GOLD | 1505 | 20-14 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 19891 | Ne Jrs 13-Red | 1505 | 13-6 | 68% | 13 | NE |
| 19892 | CVA 17 Navy | 1505 | 31-28 | 53% | 17 | CO |
| 19893 | Platinum 14-Apex | 1505 | 15-24 | 36% | 14 | UT |
| 19894 | Reef 17-National dk | 1505 | 33-29 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 19895 | Uno Girls 17-National | 1505 | 1-1 | 50% | 17 | IL |
| 19896 | Zuma Bay 14-Riptide | 1505 | 14-14 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 19897 | DigThis! Ohana 14-Black | 1505 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | NV |
| 19898 | Shock 13-Ua spark | 1505 | 19-16 | 54% | 13 | IL |
| 19899 | Club Fusion 17-Heat | 1505 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 19900 | Wisconsin Blaze 15-Red | 1505 | 18-21 | 46% | 15 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.