Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 397 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19801 Sundogs Volleyball Club 15-Sundog elite 1506 4-3 57% 15 SK
19802 EVA 14-Blackshirts 1506 16-11 59% 14 CO
19803 MAVS KC Select 11-1 1506 4-1 80% 11 KS
19804 New WaveS 15-Aer 1506 37-28 57% 15 FL
19805 Vegas United 14-Local 1506 2-1 67% 14 NV
19806 RCVS 13-1 victor 1506 3-2 60% 13 PR
19807 WI Flight 15-White 1506 6-5 55% 15 WI
19808 Upstate 13-Hope 1506 5-4 50% 13 SC
19809 Ohana 14-National 1506 16-16 48% 14 IA
19810 OnSite Rising Heat 12-2 1506 23-29 40% 12 TX
19811 WI Flight 12-White 1506 2-2 50% 12 WI
19812 Hot Shots 15-National 1506 2-2 50% 15 OH
19813 LTX SELECT 10-Yellow 1506 2-3 29% 10 TX
19814 SG Elite 18-Elite 1506 19-16 54% 18 CA
19815 IHT Elite 18-1 1506 3-2 33% 18 ND
19816 MGA 14-Stars 1506 15-19 44% 14 MA
19817 Metro Volleyball Club 14-South fx 1506 23-19 53% 14 DC
19818 HPRIME 11-Purple 1506 2-1 40% 11 TX
19819 Rise 14-Kaite 1506 16-11 55% 14 ID
19820 Amarillo Xtreme 11 Ladies 1506 10-17 37% 11 TX
19821 LIV 18-Royal susie-sierra 1506 21-16 57% 18 CA
19822 SC Scorchers Elite 14-S 1506 25-14 60% 14 TX
19823 Croix Attack 18-1 1506 17-12 59% 18 WI
19824 CTX Slam 12-N gold 1506 24-22 51% 12 TX
19825 K2 14 Redbacks 1506 25-22 53% 14 TN
19826 MCVC Black 15-1 1506 11-10 52% 15 IN
19827 Northside VBC 18 1506 17-11 61% 18 WI
19828 3N1 12-Purple 1506 19-20 49% 12 WA
19829 HAVC 13-H blue 1506 4-1 80% 13 SD
19830 JJVA Club 15-B 1506 11-12 48% 15 FL
19831 KODA 17-Crown 1506 8-8 40% 17 NY
19832 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 16-Travel 1506 4-3 57% 16 NJ
19833 KODA 18-Select 1506 32-14 64% 18 NY
19834 Bay Area Eagles 11-U 1506 23-34 40% 11 CA
19835 Lusk Volleyball Club 10 1506 5-4 56% 10 WY
19836 Prodigy 12-Panther 1506 17-13 57% 12 KY
19837 Foothills 12-Black 1505 25-24 51% 12 WA
19838 Spartan Wave 14-1 1505 7-8 47% 14 MN
19839 Blue Banner BBV 15-Abby 1505 20-24 45% 15 CA
19840 Chatuge Shores 17-Black 1505 10-31 24% 17 GA
19841 Atomic! 16-Rebecca 1505 4-3 50% 16 MI
19842 Team Pineapple 17-Black 1505 17-38 31% 17 IN
19843 HBJ 13-Clarksville 1505 6-4 60% 13 AR
19844 417 MoJrs 12-Reg black 1505 4-4 40% 12 MO
19845 Princeton Volleyball Club 16 1505 22-12 65% 16 NJ
19846 Dynamite 16-Premier 1505 23-13 64% 16 MI
19847 FC Elite 16-Blue 1505 25-28 47% 16 WI
19848 FBK 15-Black 1505 32-28 53% 15 AZ
19849 purple storm 13-2 1505 5-3 50% 13 AL
19850 Palm Beach Jrs 12-1 1505 10-8 56% 12 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.