2025-2026 Season — Page 397 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19801 | Sundogs Volleyball Club 15-Sundog elite | 1506 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | SK |
| 19802 | EVA 14-Blackshirts | 1506 | 16-11 | 59% | 14 | CO |
| 19803 | MAVS KC Select 11-1 | 1506 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | KS |
| 19804 | New WaveS 15-Aer | 1506 | 37-28 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 19805 | Vegas United 14-Local | 1506 | 2-1 | 67% | 14 | NV |
| 19806 | RCVS 13-1 victor | 1506 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | PR |
| 19807 | WI Flight 15-White | 1506 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | WI |
| 19808 | Upstate 13-Hope | 1506 | 5-4 | 50% | 13 | SC |
| 19809 | Ohana 14-National | 1506 | 16-16 | 48% | 14 | IA |
| 19810 | OnSite Rising Heat 12-2 | 1506 | 23-29 | 40% | 12 | TX |
| 19811 | WI Flight 12-White | 1506 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | WI |
| 19812 | Hot Shots 15-National | 1506 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | OH |
| 19813 | LTX SELECT 10-Yellow | 1506 | 2-3 | 29% | 10 | TX |
| 19814 | SG Elite 18-Elite | 1506 | 19-16 | 54% | 18 | CA |
| 19815 | IHT Elite 18-1 | 1506 | 3-2 | 33% | 18 | ND |
| 19816 | MGA 14-Stars | 1506 | 15-19 | 44% | 14 | MA |
| 19817 | Metro Volleyball Club 14-South fx | 1506 | 23-19 | 53% | 14 | DC |
| 19818 | HPRIME 11-Purple | 1506 | 2-1 | 40% | 11 | TX |
| 19819 | Rise 14-Kaite | 1506 | 16-11 | 55% | 14 | ID |
| 19820 | Amarillo Xtreme 11 Ladies | 1506 | 10-17 | 37% | 11 | TX |
| 19821 | LIV 18-Royal susie-sierra | 1506 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 19822 | SC Scorchers Elite 14-S | 1506 | 25-14 | 60% | 14 | TX |
| 19823 | Croix Attack 18-1 | 1506 | 17-12 | 59% | 18 | WI |
| 19824 | CTX Slam 12-N gold | 1506 | 24-22 | 51% | 12 | TX |
| 19825 | K2 14 Redbacks | 1506 | 25-22 | 53% | 14 | TN |
| 19826 | MCVC Black 15-1 | 1506 | 11-10 | 52% | 15 | IN |
| 19827 | Northside VBC 18 | 1506 | 17-11 | 61% | 18 | WI |
| 19828 | 3N1 12-Purple | 1506 | 19-20 | 49% | 12 | WA |
| 19829 | HAVC 13-H blue | 1506 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | SD |
| 19830 | JJVA Club 15-B | 1506 | 11-12 | 48% | 15 | FL |
| 19831 | KODA 17-Crown | 1506 | 8-8 | 40% | 17 | NY |
| 19832 | NYC Impact Volleyball Club 16-Travel | 1506 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | NJ |
| 19833 | KODA 18-Select | 1506 | 32-14 | 64% | 18 | NY |
| 19834 | Bay Area Eagles 11-U | 1506 | 23-34 | 40% | 11 | CA |
| 19835 | Lusk Volleyball Club 10 | 1506 | 5-4 | 56% | 10 | WY |
| 19836 | Prodigy 12-Panther | 1506 | 17-13 | 57% | 12 | KY |
| 19837 | Foothills 12-Black | 1505 | 25-24 | 51% | 12 | WA |
| 19838 | Spartan Wave 14-1 | 1505 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | MN |
| 19839 | Blue Banner BBV 15-Abby | 1505 | 20-24 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 19840 | Chatuge Shores 17-Black | 1505 | 10-31 | 24% | 17 | GA |
| 19841 | Atomic! 16-Rebecca | 1505 | 4-3 | 50% | 16 | MI |
| 19842 | Team Pineapple 17-Black | 1505 | 17-38 | 31% | 17 | IN |
| 19843 | HBJ 13-Clarksville | 1505 | 6-4 | 60% | 13 | AR |
| 19844 | 417 MoJrs 12-Reg black | 1505 | 4-4 | 40% | 12 | MO |
| 19845 | Princeton Volleyball Club 16 | 1505 | 22-12 | 65% | 16 | NJ |
| 19846 | Dynamite 16-Premier | 1505 | 23-13 | 64% | 16 | MI |
| 19847 | FC Elite 16-Blue | 1505 | 25-28 | 47% | 16 | WI |
| 19848 | FBK 15-Black | 1505 | 32-28 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 19849 | purple storm 13-2 | 1505 | 5-3 | 50% | 13 | AL |
| 19850 | Palm Beach Jrs 12-1 | 1505 | 10-8 | 56% | 12 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.