Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 396 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19751 MiElite 16-Emerald east 1506 16-10 62% 16 MI
19752 Bubbles United 16-Gomez 1506 16-11 59% 16 FL
19753 FVC 16-Travel 1506 12-9 57% 16 CA
19754 SVVC 16 1506 3-2 60% 16 KY
19755 KCV 12-1 devon 1506 2-3 40% 12 CA
19756 Empowered 12-Elite black 1506 21-21 50% 12 IN
19757 I AM VBC 17-White 1506 22-19 52% 17 WI
19758 BEAST ATHLETICS 16-Maroon 1506 10-4 71% 16 TX
19759 COVC 16-Nationals 1506 11-22 33% 16 OR
19760 Southern Lights 14-S 1506 3-2 60% 14 SD
19761 Matrix Girls 18-1 1506 5-4 56% 18 AZ
19762 Legit 15-Holly 1506 2-2 50% 15 IA
19763 Renaissance 16-White bc 1506 9-8 53% 16 OH
19764 New WaveS 15-Aer 1506 37-28 57% 15 FL
19765 YVA 16 1506 4-2 67% 16 WY
19766 KIVA 14-Blue 1506 34-27 56% 14 KY
19767 FMTVA 12-Purple 1506 8-6 47% 12 TX
19768 Idaho ONE 14-Central national 1506 12-8 57% 14 ID
19769 Watertown 12-Red 1506 1-2 33% 12 MN
19770 Sicangu 17-Teal 1506 2-2 50% 17 SD
19771 Midwest Aces 13-Craft bees 1506 2-3 40% 13 OH
19772 NIVA 15-BLACK 1506 37-46 45% 15 IN
19773 spc volleyball 12-1 1506 8-8 50% 12 FL
19774 Northern Heat 12-1 1506 11-11 46% 12 MN
19775 SA Elite 13-3 gold 1506 24-19 53% 13 TX
19776 Balance 13-White 1506 32-32 50% 13 IL
19777 LOBOS 16-Black 1506 24-18 57% 16 CO
19778 HAVC 13-H blue 1506 4-1 80% 13 SD
19779 3N1 12-Purple 1506 19-20 49% 12 WA
19780 New Wave 16-S platinum 1506 22-26 46% 16 CA
19781 MiElite 13-Cs north 1506 7-5 47% 13 MI
19782 Salton Sea Starlings 17-1 1506 3-2 60% 17 CA
19783 Sunset West 14-Dash 1506 2-1 40% 14 NE
19784 TX432 17-Gold 1506 19-14 54% 17 TX
19785 Panther Volleyball Club 15 1506 6-5 46% 15 IA
19786 ARVC 13-White 1506 18-13 58% 13 NC
19787 MAVS 816 11-2 1506 5-1 83% 11 KS
19788 Ignite 13 Blaze 1506 25-22 53% 13 TX
19789 TAV South 12-White 1506 10-9 48% 12 TX
19790 AV Coach Gizzelle / Coach Lonzo 18 1506 4-4 50% 18 CA
19791 SECC Rebels VBA 17-1 1506 7-6 54% 17 MA
19792 STARZ 15-White 1506 26-15 63% 15 IL
19793 Platinum 15-Apex c 1506 18-23 44% 15 UT
19794 BVA 17-S cj 1506 2-2 50% 17 FL
19795 ACESZ 14-White 1506 3-2 60% 14 MI
19796 Capitals 16-National 1506 27-29 48% 16 NJ
19797 NKJV 15-Black 1506 18-15 55% 15 KY
19798 SEIVB 14 Synergy 1506 9-7 56% 14 IN
19799 Sundogs Volleyball Club 15-Sundog elite 1506 4-3 57% 15 SK
19800 EVA 14-Blackshirts 1506 16-11 59% 14 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.