Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 395 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19701 Golden State 12-Black 1507 18-20 47% 12 CA
19702 Diggin VBA 12-S black 1507 12-9 57% 12 TX
19703 SVBC 13-Teal 1507 8-11 40% 13 IA
19704 Asphalt Green VBC 14-2 1507 2-1 67% 14 NY
19705 Aspire 18-1 1507 3-5 38% 18 AZ
19706 FIELDHOUSE VBC 17-Ikaika andy 1507 1-6 14% 17 TX
19707 Big Sky 17-Challenger 1507 3-1 75% 17 FL
19708 VC Denver 12-Regional 1507 16-10 62% 12 CO
19709 ACT 11-Craig 1507 16-18 47% 11 CA
19710 Hammerhead 18-1 1507 24-31 44% 18 MN
19711 ID Crush 14-Rencher 1507 20-23 47% 14 ID
19712 USJVA 14-1 1507 4-4 50% 14 GA
19713 Kokoro Volleyball 14 Blk 1507 40-26 61% 14 MN
19714 O3 12-Blue 1507 18-12 60% 12 MI
19715 VCNebraska 17-Blue 1507 6-12 33% 17 NE
19716 TAV South 13-Royal 1507 13-24 30% 13 TX
19717 Club Cactus 12-Silver 1507 19-19 50% 12 AZ
19718 Top Flight 14-Theta 1507 25-29 46% 14 IL
19719 Cadets 11-Z 1507 9-11 45% 11 IN
19720 Central Mass Juniors 18-Elite 1507 5-3 63% 18 MA
19721 UtahIce 16-Brin 1507 5-9 36% 16 UT
19722 North AL 16-Molly 1507 8-7 53% 16 AL
19723 North Coast 17-1 1507 5-4 56% 17 CA
19724 West Side 12-L. monita 1507 8-5 57% 12 MN
19725 SCWave 13-Rivercrest lauren 1506 11-7 61% 13 IN
19726 Max Performance 16-Blue 1506 25-31 45% 16 TX
19727 Legit 15-Holly 1506 2-2 50% 15 IA
19728 Southern Lights 14-S 1506 3-2 60% 14 SD
19729 314 VBC 11-Red 1506 22-21 51% 11 MO
19730 NCH 17-1 1506 10-9 53% 17 FL
19731 FURY Volleyball 15-Jared 1506 13-11 54% 15 NY
19732 Monon 14-1mi launch 1506 12-13 48% 14 IN
19733 SynergyForce 13-Blue 1506 16-14 53% 13 CA
19734 NIVA 15-BLACK 1506 37-46 45% 15 IN
19735 Kimball 14-Blue 1506 2-2 50% 14 MN
19736 Sunset West 14-Dash 1506 2-1 40% 14 NE
19737 Legacy 15-Select west blu 1506 29-15 66% 15 MI
19738 Jax Skyline 13-Black 1506 30-32 48% 13 FL
19739 Sideout VA 14-C 1506 7-5 58% 14 NV
19740 Renaissance 16-White bc 1506 9-8 53% 16 OH
19741 YVA 16 1506 4-2 67% 16 WY
19742 KIVA 14-Blue 1506 34-27 56% 14 KY
19743 NCVC 14-Mizuno 1506 13-25 34% 14 CA
19744 Tamales Volleyball Club G16-2 1506 5-1 83% 16 MO
19745 PVA 11 1506 12-6 67% 11 SC
19746 Bay Area Eagles 11-U 1506 23-34 40% 11 CA
19747 3N1 12-Purple 1506 19-20 49% 12 WA
19748 Victory 12-Elite green 1506 26-25 48% 12 TX
19749 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 16-Travel 1506 4-3 57% 16 NJ
19750 AVC Red 14-2 1506 10-9 53% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.