Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 394 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19651 NHouston Elite 13-Usa 1507 8-7 50% 13 TX
19652 TVVC 18-Black 1507 15-12 56% 18 OR
19653 Hype VB 13-Weber 1507 7-4 54% 13 MS
19654 INLND 16-1 1507 15-12 56% 16 CA
19655 SOSVBC 16-T rachael 1507 7-3 70% 16 NY
19656 DCVC 14-National 1507 20-17 50% 14 IA
19657 SIVA 18 SAMMIE 1507 26-25 51% 18 WA
19658 Zona VBC 15-R1 1507 22-21 51% 15 AZ
19659 Southern Alabama Volleyball Academy (SAVA) 14 SAVA Sharks 1507 8-15 35% 14 AL
19660 CUVC 12-Roar 1507 11-9 50% 12 NC
19661 Sideout 14-Velocity 1507 3-2 60% 14 NY
19662 SC Legends 12-Gold 1507 17-10 63% 12 CA
19663 Sky Volleyball Club 15-Sky blue 1507 4-3 57% 15
19664 FUSION 16-Gray 1507 18-18 50% 16 PA
19665 HVVC 15-Black 1507 21-17 55% 15 MI
19666 FCE 14-2 1507 5-10 33% 14 FL
19667 River City Jrs 12 Navy 1507 27-23 54% 12 IA
19668 ECC 15-North black 1507 24-18 57% 15 NJ
19669 Arete 10-Prep navy 1507 5-5 38% 10 TX
19670 Watertown JO 14-Blue 1507 1-2 33% 14 MN
19671 UtahIce 16-Brin 1507 5-9 36% 16 UT
19672 CINCY EAST 14-2 blue 1507 25-21 54% 14 OH
19673 573 18-National l 1507 18-14 56% 18 MO
19674 CL Pioneer VBC 14-1 1507 1-4 20% 14 MI
19675 Roanoke United 16-White 1507 21-16 57% 16 VA
19676 CVC 12-Red 1507 6-3 67% 12 OH
19677 RVA 17-Joy 1507 4-5 44% 17 TN
19678 USANY Five River 15 1507 2-3 33% 15 NY
19679 KC Force 12-Black 1507 2-3 40% 12 MO
19680 ULTRA VB 15-Black 1507 3-2 60% 15 NV
19681 Deary-U 14 1507 2-2 50% 14 WA
19682 Pinellas Heat Elite 18-Elite 1507 25-24 51% 18 FL
19683 Elkhart 14-Blue 1507 3-3 50% 14 IN
19684 Bay Area Eagles 16-Hank 1507 15-22 41% 16 CA
19685 STL Crossfire 16-T1 1507 35-28 56% 16 MO
19686 FC United 12-Black 1507 12-8 57% 12 MO
19687 OBX WAVE 12 1507 6-6 50% 12 VA
19688 Academy 11-Diamond 1507 10-12 45% 11 NC
19689 GOLDENBULLS 13-G black 1507 4-4 50% 13 FL
19690 UPTEMPO 12 Scott 1507 8-5 62% 12 CA
19691 NLV 12-1 1507 11-9 55% 12 GA
19692 Roughriders 15-1 1507 4-3 57% 15 MA
19693 DVBC Meeker 12-S - rebekah 1507 1-1 25% 12 CO
19694 Golden State 12-Black 1507 18-20 47% 12 CA
19695 Diggin VBA 12-S black 1507 12-9 57% 12 TX
19696 SVBC 13-Teal 1507 8-11 40% 13 IA
19697 Asphalt Green VBC 14-2 1507 2-1 67% 14 NY
19698 Aspire 18-1 1507 3-5 38% 18 AZ
19699 FIELDHOUSE VBC 17-Ikaika andy 1507 1-6 14% 17 TX
19700 Big Sky 17-Challenger 1507 3-1 75% 17 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.