2025-2026 Season — Page 393 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19601 | JAG VBC 15-3 | 1508 | 13-9 | 59% | 15 | WI |
| 19602 | Flight Club 15-1 | 1508 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | OH |
| 19603 | ClubRedVB WI 13-Red | 1508 | 15-17 | 47% | 13 | WI |
| 19604 | SOL 14-1 | 1508 | 9-10 | 45% | 14 | TX |
| 19605 | JNVBC 14-E teal | 1508 | 15-11 | 58% | 14 | IA |
| 19606 | Club Four 18-Boost | 1508 | 19-16 | 54% | 18 | MO |
| 19607 | Mizuno Club North Volleyball 17-1 | 1508 | 2-2 | 50% | 17 | MO |
| 19608 | OCVC 14-Black | 1508 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 19609 | Rolling Thunder 15-Blue | 1508 | 22-16 | 58% | 15 | IL |
| 19610 | CID 18-Blue | 1508 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | ID |
| 19611 | Underwood Slammers 12-1 | 1508 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | MN |
| 19612 | OCVBC 10 | 1508 | 2-2 | 40% | 10 | NE |
| 19613 | CGSV 16-Stein | 1508 | 9-8 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 19614 | Surfside 11-Pv elite | 1508 | 21-28 | 43% | 11 | CA |
| 19615 | TDV 14-National | 1508 | 22-17 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 19616 | Rockwood 10-White | 1508 | 14-11 | 50% | 10 | MO |
| 19617 | Eastlake 14-Alyssa | 1508 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 19618 | IVC 14-Black | 1508 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | IA |
| 19619 | Momentum Volleyball Club 13 Momentum Fire (CH) | 1508 | 19-15 | 53% | 13 | |
| 19620 | Low Country 13 Annie | 1508 | 20-14 | 59% | 13 | SC |
| 19621 | SynVBC 16-1 | 1508 | 12-8 | 60% | 16 | NY |
| 19622 | Alabama Perf 14-N white | 1508 | 37-21 | 64% | 14 | AL |
| 19623 | North Coast 17-1 | 1507 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 19624 | Dig It VBC 13-2 | 1507 | 15-13 | 54% | 13 | IL |
| 19625 | Aspire 13-3 teal | 1507 | 8-9 | 47% | 13 | AB |
| 19626 | Atlantic Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1507 | 32-31 | 51% | 15 | FL |
| 19627 | The Edge 15-Black | 1507 | 27-22 | 55% | 15 | IL |
| 19628 | Academy 11-Diamond | 1507 | 10-12 | 45% | 11 | NC |
| 19629 | Evolution 16-Red | 1507 | 9-7 | 53% | 16 | IA |
| 19630 | SIVA 18 SAMMIE | 1507 | 26-25 | 51% | 18 | WA |
| 19631 | Zona VBC 15-R1 | 1507 | 22-21 | 51% | 15 | AZ |
| 19632 | Cloud Peak 10-Ana | 1507 | 6-4 | 60% | 10 | WY |
| 19633 | PVC POWER 15 | 1507 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | OH |
| 19634 | FUSION 16-Gray | 1507 | 18-18 | 50% | 16 | PA |
| 19635 | Southern Alabama Volleyball Academy (SAVA) 14 SAVA Sharks | 1507 | 8-15 | 35% | 14 | AL |
| 19636 | Sideout 14-Velocity | 1507 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | NY |
| 19637 | LEGACY 13-Elite sebastian | 1507 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | FL |
| 19638 | Florida Conquer 15-National | 1507 | 31-23 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 19639 | NIVA 14 SILVER | 1507 | 25-17 | 60% | 14 | IN |
| 19640 | UtahIce 16-Brin | 1507 | 5-9 | 36% | 16 | UT |
| 19641 | 352Elite 12-G green | 1507 | 21-29 | 42% | 12 | FL |
| 19642 | CUVC 12-Roar | 1507 | 11-9 | 50% | 12 | NC |
| 19643 | DCVC 14-National | 1507 | 20-17 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 19644 | New Prague JO 12-Red | 1507 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 19645 | SA Force 12-Black | 1507 | 12-11 | 52% | 12 | TX |
| 19646 | Capital Ice 16 | 1507 | 27-27 | 50% | 16 | WA |
| 19647 | Atlanta Extreme 12-Ashlei | 1507 | 12-7 | 60% | 12 | GA |
| 19648 | Heat Volleyball Club-Fox Valley 12-Black | 1507 | 21-19 | 53% | 12 | WI |
| 19649 | HVVC 14-1 | 1507 | 17-15 | 52% | 14 | OR |
| 19650 | Dime Volleyball Club 16-Premier | 1507 | 27-22 | 55% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.