Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 392 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19551 Elite Alliance 16-Denzer 1508 2-2 50% 16 SD
19552 Bootheel SMASH 15-C 1508 6-8 35% 15 MO
19553 SW Fusion 16-Gold 1508 2-2 50% 16 MN
19554 FLX Waves 15-1 1508 10-11 45% 15 NY
19555 STVA 12 Navy 1508 20-31 38% 12 TX
19556 Sonics 13-1 1508 2-2 50% 13 NY
19557 CADO 18 SERENDIPITY 1508 19-25 40% 18 NY
19558 MWVC 17-Lizardi 1508 1-5 17% 17 PR
19559 HD Starlings 15-1 1508 17-15 53% 15 CA
19560 Veritas 13 Dodson 1508 37-28 57% 13 AL
19561 Midwest Intensity VBC 16 1508 17-12 55% 16 MO
19562 Net Force 13-3 orange 1508 23-19 50% 13 IA
19563 Piedmont VBC 12 Vapor 1508 4-5 36% 12 NC
19564 Sanford Sports 16-White 1508 20-21 49% 16 SD
19565 Houston Hazard 12-White 1508 11-10 52% 12 TX
19566 ACS 18-Elite 1508 19-16 54% 18 NC
19567 AV 12-1 1508 11-13 46% 12 MN
19568 SLAM 18-Black 1508 13-16 45% 18 TX
19569 U18 Merge 18-22 1508 4-3 57% 18 CO
19570 Delaware Juniors 17-Ace 1508 19-22 46% 17 PA
19571 Slammers 16-Tracie 1508 7-6 54% 16 NC
19572 Legends 16-3 moises 1508 7-5 54% 16 PR
19573 Mobile Storm 13 National 1508 21-16 57% 13 AL
19574 ForceVC 12-3 1508 10-7 59% 12 OH
19575 SPVB 18-Blue 1508 16-11 59% 18 IL
19576 C2 Sports 13 City 1508 18-14 56% 13 TN
19577 Academy 12-1 mi panthers 1508 12-9 57% 12 IN
19578 Centennial CVA 14-1 pfadenhauer 1508 2-4 33% 14 IA
19579 Lakas 18-Power 1508 15-20 43% 18 CA
19580 MOJO Elite Volleyball 18-Black 1508 11-11 48% 18 VA
19581 Ocean Volleyball 17-National jose 1508 33-38 46% 17 NJ
19582 Attack VBC 10-Black 1508 9-3 60% 10 IL
19583 Ignite 14 Heat 1508 3-2 60% 14 ND
19584 Tstreet IE 17-Aerielle 1508 21-35 38% 17 CA
19585 Starlings NYC Queens 18-1 1508 2-5 29% 18 NY
19586 Team Momentum 11-Navy 1508 17-17 50% 11 MO
19587 LV 11 Thunder 1508 9-8 43% 11 TX
19588 Club V South 11-Jeanette 1508 6-6 35% 11 UT
19589 The House 18-Black 1508 40-33 55% 18 MI
19590 GSEVC 15-Premier 1508 10-32 24% 15 NJ
19591 Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 12-1 1508 10-10 50% 12 SC
19592 Crossfire 12-Pink 1508 5-5 50% 12 MN
19593 Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Bella (PM) (6) 1508 3-3 50% 12 SC
19594 Sartell 17-2 1508 11-10 48% 17 MN
19595 JAG VBC 15-3 1508 13-9 59% 15 WI
19596 Portland VBC 18-1 1508 4-4 50% 18 OR
19597 Flight Club 15-1 1508 6-5 55% 15 OH
19598 ClubRedVB WI 13-Red 1508 15-17 47% 13 WI
19599 Ignite Volleyball Club 15 15U Liz 1508 3-3 50% 15 UT
19600 Queens Apex 14-1 1508 10-9 53% 14 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.