2025-2026 Season — Page 392 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19551 | Elite Alliance 16-Denzer | 1508 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | SD |
| 19552 | Bootheel SMASH 15-C | 1508 | 6-8 | 35% | 15 | MO |
| 19553 | SW Fusion 16-Gold | 1508 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 19554 | FLX Waves 15-1 | 1508 | 10-11 | 45% | 15 | NY |
| 19555 | STVA 12 Navy | 1508 | 20-31 | 38% | 12 | TX |
| 19556 | Sonics 13-1 | 1508 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | NY |
| 19557 | CADO 18 SERENDIPITY | 1508 | 19-25 | 40% | 18 | NY |
| 19558 | MWVC 17-Lizardi | 1508 | 1-5 | 17% | 17 | PR |
| 19559 | HD Starlings 15-1 | 1508 | 17-15 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 19560 | Veritas 13 Dodson | 1508 | 37-28 | 57% | 13 | AL |
| 19561 | Midwest Intensity VBC 16 | 1508 | 17-12 | 55% | 16 | MO |
| 19562 | Net Force 13-3 orange | 1508 | 23-19 | 50% | 13 | IA |
| 19563 | Piedmont VBC 12 Vapor | 1508 | 4-5 | 36% | 12 | NC |
| 19564 | Sanford Sports 16-White | 1508 | 20-21 | 49% | 16 | SD |
| 19565 | Houston Hazard 12-White | 1508 | 11-10 | 52% | 12 | TX |
| 19566 | ACS 18-Elite | 1508 | 19-16 | 54% | 18 | NC |
| 19567 | AV 12-1 | 1508 | 11-13 | 46% | 12 | MN |
| 19568 | SLAM 18-Black | 1508 | 13-16 | 45% | 18 | TX |
| 19569 | U18 Merge 18-22 | 1508 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | CO |
| 19570 | Delaware Juniors 17-Ace | 1508 | 19-22 | 46% | 17 | PA |
| 19571 | Slammers 16-Tracie | 1508 | 7-6 | 54% | 16 | NC |
| 19572 | Legends 16-3 moises | 1508 | 7-5 | 54% | 16 | PR |
| 19573 | Mobile Storm 13 National | 1508 | 21-16 | 57% | 13 | AL |
| 19574 | ForceVC 12-3 | 1508 | 10-7 | 59% | 12 | OH |
| 19575 | SPVB 18-Blue | 1508 | 16-11 | 59% | 18 | IL |
| 19576 | C2 Sports 13 City | 1508 | 18-14 | 56% | 13 | TN |
| 19577 | Academy 12-1 mi panthers | 1508 | 12-9 | 57% | 12 | IN |
| 19578 | Centennial CVA 14-1 pfadenhauer | 1508 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 19579 | Lakas 18-Power | 1508 | 15-20 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 19580 | MOJO Elite Volleyball 18-Black | 1508 | 11-11 | 48% | 18 | VA |
| 19581 | Ocean Volleyball 17-National jose | 1508 | 33-38 | 46% | 17 | NJ |
| 19582 | Attack VBC 10-Black | 1508 | 9-3 | 60% | 10 | IL |
| 19583 | Ignite 14 Heat | 1508 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | ND |
| 19584 | Tstreet IE 17-Aerielle | 1508 | 21-35 | 38% | 17 | CA |
| 19585 | Starlings NYC Queens 18-1 | 1508 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | NY |
| 19586 | Team Momentum 11-Navy | 1508 | 17-17 | 50% | 11 | MO |
| 19587 | LV 11 Thunder | 1508 | 9-8 | 43% | 11 | TX |
| 19588 | Club V South 11-Jeanette | 1508 | 6-6 | 35% | 11 | UT |
| 19589 | The House 18-Black | 1508 | 40-33 | 55% | 18 | MI |
| 19590 | GSEVC 15-Premier | 1508 | 10-32 | 24% | 15 | NJ |
| 19591 | Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 12-1 | 1508 | 10-10 | 50% | 12 | SC |
| 19592 | Crossfire 12-Pink | 1508 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 19593 | Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Bella (PM) (6) | 1508 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | SC |
| 19594 | Sartell 17-2 | 1508 | 11-10 | 48% | 17 | MN |
| 19595 | JAG VBC 15-3 | 1508 | 13-9 | 59% | 15 | WI |
| 19596 | Portland VBC 18-1 | 1508 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | OR |
| 19597 | Flight Club 15-1 | 1508 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | OH |
| 19598 | ClubRedVB WI 13-Red | 1508 | 15-17 | 47% | 13 | WI |
| 19599 | Ignite Volleyball Club 15 15U Liz | 1508 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | UT |
| 19600 | Queens Apex 14-1 | 1508 | 10-9 | 53% | 14 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.