2025-2026 Season — Page 391 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19501 | Rally Cats 14 | 1509 | 4-3 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 19502 | Advantage 15-Gold | 1509 | 23-13 | 64% | 15 | NC |
| 19503 | Hollywood 16-4 rise | 1509 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | OH |
| 19504 | Dime 15-Premier | 1509 | 21-27 | 44% | 15 | CA |
| 19505 | KIVA 14 Mandy | 1509 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | KY |
| 19506 | New Age Volleyball Club 15-Silver | 1509 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 19507 | Grandlake 17-Hardesty | 1509 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | OH |
| 19508 | Meraki Volleyball 14-1 | 1509 | 18-12 | 60% | 14 | NH |
| 19509 | CVBC 11-1s | 1509 | 12-13 | 48% | 11 | IN |
| 19510 | One Speed 14-1 | 1509 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | NV |
| 19511 | Sandia Elite 16-National | 1509 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | NV |
| 19512 | KNVBC 12 Showtime | 1509 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | KS |
| 19513 | Ohana 12-Black regional | 1509 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | IA |
| 19514 | MN Select 15-Black | 1509 | 35-33 | 51% | 15 | MN |
| 19515 | HP Illinois 13-Coral | 1509 | 1-1 | 33% | 13 | MO |
| 19516 | County Volleyball Club 14-2 | 1509 | 25-19 | 57% | 14 | AL |
| 19517 | Arsenal 14-Blue | 1509 | 18-15 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 19518 | Tsunami 17-2e burney | 1509 | 26-34 | 43% | 17 | GA |
| 19519 | A5 Regional 16-MA | 1509 | 7-4 | 64% | 16 | GA |
| 19520 | Stockdale RVC 14-Adidas | 1509 | 25-31 | 45% | 14 | TX |
| 19521 | City Beach 15-Meg | 1509 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 19522 | ZSA 14-Tenacity | 1509 | 19-18 | 49% | 14 | NJ |
| 19523 | MAVA 11-GreatWhite | 1509 | 32-23 | 58% | 11 | KY |
| 19524 | Lions 13-Teal | 1509 | 19-10 | 66% | 13 | IL |
| 19525 | PVC 16-1 (NV) | 1509 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | NV |
| 19526 | FCA Clark 16-Elevate | 1508 | 22-18 | 52% | 16 | OR |
| 19527 | MiElite 16-Ns east | 1508 | 19-16 | 54% | 16 | MI |
| 19528 | Nome VBC 13 | 1508 | 0-2 | 0% | 13 | AK |
| 19529 | ACE Elite 14-1 | 1508 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | MN |
| 19530 | Mindset Premier 15-White | 1508 | 33-13 | 72% | 15 | IL |
| 19531 | Dayton Jrs 16-White | 1508 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | OH |
| 19532 | Elite Alliance 16-Denzer | 1508 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | SD |
| 19533 | Bootheel SMASH 15-C | 1508 | 6-8 | 35% | 15 | MO |
| 19534 | Falcon Fever 13 | 1508 | 6-3 | 60% | 13 | MN |
| 19535 | Gurabo Volley 13 | 1508 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | PR |
| 19536 | MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 14 MOCO (MD) Miracle | 1508 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | MD |
| 19537 | Annapolis 15U Regional | 1508 | 14-11 | 50% | 15 | MD |
| 19538 | Academy 16-R dragons | 1508 | 28-18 | 61% | 16 | IN |
| 19539 | FLX Waves 15-1 | 1508 | 10-11 | 45% | 15 | NY |
| 19540 | Angelo Rise 16-2 | 1508 | 13-14 | 48% | 16 | TX |
| 19541 | Crossfire 12-Pink | 1508 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 19542 | Starlings 11-S | 1508 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | NE |
| 19543 | Portland VBC 18-1 | 1508 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | OR |
| 19544 | Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Bella (PM) (6) | 1508 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | SC |
| 19545 | Ignite Volleyball Club 15 15U Liz | 1508 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | UT |
| 19546 | Ohana Volleyball 13-Blue | 1508 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | TX |
| 19547 | Queens Apex 14-1 | 1508 | 10-9 | 53% | 14 | NY |
| 19548 | District 12 12 ULTRA | 1508 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | FL |
| 19549 | RRVBC 12-Maddie | 1508 | 26-14 | 63% | 12 | GA |
| 19550 | MDJRS 18 Open | 1508 | 19-18 | 48% | 18 | MD |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.