Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 391 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19501 Rally Cats 14 1509 4-3 50% 14 IA
19502 Advantage 15-Gold 1509 23-13 64% 15 NC
19503 Hollywood 16-4 rise 1509 3-2 60% 16 OH
19504 Dime 15-Premier 1509 21-27 44% 15 CA
19505 KIVA 14 Mandy 1509 4-2 67% 14 KY
19506 New Age Volleyball Club 15-Silver 1509 4-3 57% 15 TX
19507 Grandlake 17-Hardesty 1509 3-2 60% 17 OH
19508 Meraki Volleyball 14-1 1509 18-12 60% 14 NH
19509 CVBC 11-1s 1509 12-13 48% 11 IN
19510 One Speed 14-1 1509 3-2 60% 14 NV
19511 Sandia Elite 16-National 1509 4-4 50% 16 NV
19512 KNVBC 12 Showtime 1509 4-3 57% 12 KS
19513 Ohana 12-Black regional 1509 3-3 50% 12 IA
19514 MN Select 15-Black 1509 35-33 51% 15 MN
19515 HP Illinois 13-Coral 1509 1-1 33% 13 MO
19516 County Volleyball Club 14-2 1509 25-19 57% 14 AL
19517 Arsenal 14-Blue 1509 18-15 50% 14 TX
19518 Tsunami 17-2e burney 1509 26-34 43% 17 GA
19519 A5 Regional 16-MA 1509 7-4 64% 16 GA
19520 Stockdale RVC 14-Adidas 1509 25-31 45% 14 TX
19521 City Beach 15-Meg 1509 3-2 60% 15 CA
19522 ZSA 14-Tenacity 1509 19-18 49% 14 NJ
19523 MAVA 11-GreatWhite 1509 32-23 58% 11 KY
19524 Lions 13-Teal 1509 19-10 66% 13 IL
19525 PVC 16-1 (NV) 1509 5-3 63% 16 NV
19526 FCA Clark 16-Elevate 1508 22-18 52% 16 OR
19527 MiElite 16-Ns east 1508 19-16 54% 16 MI
19528 Nome VBC 13 1508 0-2 0% 13 AK
19529 ACE Elite 14-1 1508 11-4 73% 14 MN
19530 Mindset Premier 15-White 1508 33-13 72% 15 IL
19531 Dayton Jrs 16-White 1508 6-4 60% 16 OH
19532 Elite Alliance 16-Denzer 1508 2-2 50% 16 SD
19533 Bootheel SMASH 15-C 1508 6-8 35% 15 MO
19534 Falcon Fever 13 1508 6-3 60% 13 MN
19535 Gurabo Volley 13 1508 4-2 67% 13 PR
19536 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 14 MOCO (MD) Miracle 1508 3-2 60% 14 MD
19537 Annapolis 15U Regional 1508 14-11 50% 15 MD
19538 Academy 16-R dragons 1508 28-18 61% 16 IN
19539 FLX Waves 15-1 1508 10-11 45% 15 NY
19540 Angelo Rise 16-2 1508 13-14 48% 16 TX
19541 Crossfire 12-Pink 1508 5-5 50% 12 MN
19542 Starlings 11-S 1508 2-2 50% 11 NE
19543 Portland VBC 18-1 1508 4-4 50% 18 OR
19544 Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Bella (PM) (6) 1508 3-3 50% 12 SC
19545 Ignite Volleyball Club 15 15U Liz 1508 3-3 50% 15 UT
19546 Ohana Volleyball 13-Blue 1508 2-3 40% 13 TX
19547 Queens Apex 14-1 1508 10-9 53% 14 NY
19548 District 12 12 ULTRA 1508 3-1 75% 12 FL
19549 RRVBC 12-Maddie 1508 26-14 63% 12 GA
19550 MDJRS 18 Open 1508 19-18 48% 18 MD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.