Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 390 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19451 Two Rivers Athletic Association 12 12U White TRAA Warriors 1509 1-1 50% 12 MN
19452 Atomic! 13-Audrey 1509 4-1 80% 13 MI
19453 Voodoo Volleyball Club 17 Voodoo Jinx (BY) 1509 4-1 57% 17 LA
19454 Azalea 15-Vanessa 1509 7-5 58% 15 FL
19455 McALLEN PREMIER 15-Thunder 1509 8-9 47% 15 TX
19456 REBELS 13 1509 2-2 50% 13 ON
19457 Red Storm 16-Elite 1509 31-20 61% 16 LA
19458 BVC 14-Darcy 1509 4-5 44% 14 IA
19459 Playeros 13-1 vanessa 1509 23-17 57% 13 FL
19460 AVB Fire 17-1 black 1509 2-1 67% 17 MN
19461 Rockets Volleyball 14 Hawthorne Jr High 8th 1509 4-3 57% 14 NV
19462 Monsters 16-Blue 1509 21-10 68% 16 MI
19463 Sky 13 1509 3-2 60% 13 AL
19464 MOJO Elite Volleyball 12-Black 1509 16-17 42% 12 VA
19465 NYC Juniors Volleyball 12-Orange 1509 19-20 49% 12 NY
19466 Ridgeline 13-S 1509 12-12 48% 13 MT
19467 City 13-Blue 1509 25-27 48% 13 CA
19468 I3V 14-1 1509 17-15 53% 14 NM
19469 KIVA 11-Grey 1509 35-34 51% 11 KY
19470 PVA G15-5 1509 6-4 35% 15 MO
19471 QC Panthers 11-Blue 1509 2-1 67% 11 IA
19472 Windthorst 11-Vernon 1509 3-2 60% 11 TX
19473 Adrenaline 10 1509 2-1 50% 10 IA
19474 Moco MAVS 10-Cp 1509 2-1 67% 10 TX
19475 ID ONE 16-Mccall 1509 7-6 54% 16 ID
19476 Katy United 14-Fathom-j 1509 20-23 47% 14 TX
19477 CYDI 14-White 1509 14-9 58% 14 TX
19478 Club Momentum 16-Black 1509 2-2 50% 16 MN
19479 Solon Spartans 13-Orange 1509 6-5 40% 13 IA
19480 BG G Force 12-Black 1509 2-2 50% 12 IA
19481 Driven 12-Teal 1509 16-16 50% 12 FL
19482 NW Stars 18-Black 1509 12-12 50% 18 WI
19483 MN Select 11-1 1509 20-26 43% 11 MN
19484 Angelo Rise 14-1 1509 21-23 47% 14 TX
19485 LEGACY 10-Premier gaby 1509 17-24 41% 10 FL
19486 SSVBC 14-1 1509 8-12 38% 14 MA
19487 Rapid Fire 13-Blue 1509 9-11 45% 13 IL
19488 NET 17 1509 2-2 40% 17 AR
19489 ACESZ 15-Teal 1509 3-2 60% 15 MI
19490 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club 17-National 1509 13-15 46% 17 MA
19491 C1VB 14-Select grvl 1509 22-17 56% 14 SC
19492 Princeton Volleyball Club 15-2 1509 9-15 38% 15 NJ
19493 BVC 12-Sutton 1509 14-20 41% 12 CA
19494 Rise 16-Purple 1509 23-20 53% 16 CO
19495 Ka Ulukoa 18 Keala 1509 19-14 58% 18 HI
19496 Rally Cats 14 1509 4-3 50% 14 IA
19497 Advantage 15-Gold 1509 23-13 64% 15 NC
19498 Hollywood 16-4 rise 1509 3-2 60% 16 OH
19499 Dime 15-Premier 1509 21-27 44% 15 CA
19500 KIVA 14 Mandy 1509 4-2 67% 14 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.