Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 372 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18551 RVBC 18-Blue 1518 11-9 55% 18 PA
18552 CCV 12-1 1518 4-3 57% 12 MN
18553 Panther Girls 13-Black 1518 19-26 42% 13 CO
18554 Princeton Volleyball Club 12 1518 21-15 58% 12 NJ
18555 Northside Out Chicago 16 NorthsideOut Chicago 16black 1518 8-3 73% 16 IL
18556 FC United 15-White 1518 15-7 65% 15 MO
18557 WDVB 12 1518 2-2 50% 12 IA
18558 Iowa Vibe 15-3 1518 4-3 50% 15 IA
18559 JVA 14-Blue 1518 7-6 54% 14 FL
18560 Paradigm Volleyball Club 15 Paradigm Racket 1518 8-4 67% 15 NY
18561 KeAloha 14-1 regional 1518 17-14 55% 14 IN
18562 Next Level Volleyball Academy - NLVA 13-Sims 1518 16-17 48% 13 CA
18563 GRIT 14-Premier -2 1518 20-14 56% 14 AL
18564 BIG CAT PURPLE 13 1518 2-1 40% 13 IA
18565 FWFIRE 17-W 1518 2-1 40% 17 TX
18566 No Limits 14-Navy 1518 28-31 47% 14 FL
18567 NIVA 18-BLACK 1518 32-34 48% 18 IN
18568 Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Miko (PM) (7) 1518 4-2 67% 12 SC
18569 Effingham Elite Volleyball Club LLC 13-L 1518 7-2 78% 13 GA
18570 Electric City 16 1518 1-1 50% 16 MT
18571 Club 217 12-Jenn 1518 7-9 44% 12 IL
18572 Ethos 12 Shockwave 1518 18-16 53% 12 TN
18573 IA Juniors 14-White 1518 21-18 51% 14 IA
18574 LAVA South 14-Premier 1518 13-17 43% 14 CA
18575 Endless 15-Maroon 1518 11-10 41% 15 TX
18576 STRIKE 17-Tsunami 1518 28-17 60% 17 AZ
18577 Lakeshore Storm 13-Blue 1518 9-10 47% 13 WI
18578 Criollas 13-1 1518 10-6 63% 13 PR
18579 HP Illinois 11-Silver 1518 18-20 46% 11 MO
18580 OK Charge South 16-1 1518 30-21 59% 16 OK
18581 Prodigy VA 16-2 elite 1518 25-20 56% 16 NY
18582 Alliance 15-Avalanche 1518 15-13 47% 15 MA
18583 Diablo 15-2 brentwood 1518 18-11 60% 15 CA
18584 Smash Raiders VC 15-Synergy 1518 4-3 57% 15 ON
18585 Huskies 18-Elite 1518 5-4 56% 18 SK
18586 Legends 13-Cleveland 1518 3-3 50% 13 PR
18587 Point Break BC Volleyball Club 15 1518 5-3 63% 15
18588 RockCity 17-N3 1518 35-23 60% 17 OH
18589 Moorhead Juniors 18-1 1518 16-10 57% 18 ND
18590 360 17-Kaos white 1518 10-13 33% 17 NV
18591 RCV 14 1518 4-4 50% 14
18592 Bravo 17-Monarch 1518 28-16 64% 17 CA
18593 ClubCENTRAL 14-Grey 1518 8-6 57% 14 SD
18594 Texas Fury 13 Impact 1518 17-15 52% 13 TX
18595 TCVA 16-White adidas 1518 23-19 55% 16 TX
18596 Midwest Juniors 18-1 1518 10-10 43% 18 KS
18597 Summit Volleyball Club 13-1 1518 2-2 40% 13 MO
18598 SVC 14-Blue 1518 22-20 52% 14 GA
18599 LES 18-Nick 1518 13-10 57% 18 AL
18600 Avidity 17-Diamond 1518 20-27 43% 17 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.