Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 373 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18601 Clover 14 1518 1-1 20% 14 PA
18602 H. Prep Dev 11-White 1518 6-7 38% 11 TX
18603 Roughriders 16-1 1518 7-8 47% 16 MA
18604 Vienna Elite 15-White 1518 29-17 57% 15 VA
18605 Rival 14-Bankston 1518 17-10 63% 14 NY
18606 EP Elite 15-Teal 1518 17-28 37% 15 TX
18607 360 Volleyball Club 14 14 Kaos White 1518 3-1 60% 14 TX
18608 SWI3D 11-Black 1518 3-2 60% 11 NE
18609 Moorhead Juniors 14-2 1518 10-7 43% 14 ND
18610 OYA 18-Prime 1518 17-13 57% 18 CA
18611 Zoom 14-1 angie/addie 1518 11-8 58% 14 KS
18612 Arkansas Elite 13-2 1518 20-15 57% 13 AR
18613 Thumb Fusion 14-1 1518 3-2 60% 14 MI
18614 TUVA 16-Elite 1518 11-32 26% 16 NC
18615 Alabama Perf 16-N white 1518 30-32 48% 16 AL
18616 RCV 14 1518 4-4 50% 14
18617 AJ 16-Gold 1518 7-3 70% 16 LA
18618 Point Break BC Volleyball Club 15 1518 5-3 63% 15
18619 Beach South 15-1 1518 3-4 43% 15 GA
18620 NYCLI Volleyball Club 17-Elite 1518 24-16 60% 17 NY
18621 FDL Fusion 16-Purple 1518 9-11 45% 16 WI
18622 Boss CLE 17-2 1518 17-13 57% 17 OH
18623 Triangle 11-Blue 1518 2-2 50% 11 NC
18624 Waukon Heat 13-1 1518 3-2 60% 13 IA
18625 KW Revolution 15-Elite 1517 13-14 46% 15 TX
18626 Starlings Tucson 18-Blue 1517 4-4 50% 18 CA
18627 Upstate VBC 14-Travel 1517 2-2 29% 14 NY
18628 Cottage Grove 14-3 1517 12-5 63% 14 MN
18629 Vibe 14-Jaguars 1517 20-17 54% 14 CA
18630 Allegiance 16-Silver 1517 18-13 58% 16 TX
18631 Hammerhead 14-Green 1517 16-7 70% 14 MN
18632 Academy 16-Mi cyclops 1517 12-8 60% 16 IN
18633 Club Apex 14-Black 1517 28-17 62% 14 KY
18634 Declo Heather 14 1517 5-3 63% 14 UT
18635 Summit 14-Elevate 1517 16-13 55% 14 WA
18636 KC Vipers 12-1 black 1517 10-9 53% 12 TX
18637 VBR 13-S black 1517 14-13 52% 13 LA
18638 North Iowa Blaze 13 1517 5-3 63% 13 IA
18639 Rockland 14-Stripes 1517 8-10 44% 14 NJ
18640 Ignite 15-Liz 1517 10-10 45% 15 UT
18641 Long Island Fury Volleyball II Inc 15-Brooke 1517 4-2 67% 15 NJ
18642 FPVC 15-Ren 1517 3-9 25% 15 NV
18643 LC Elite, LCE 16-1 black 1517 4-4 50% 16 NV
18644 Sky High Adidas 17-Silver 1517 28-29 49% 17 IL
18645 JAG VBC 17-1 national 1517 48-28 63% 17 WI
18646 VAAVBC 15 1517 29-28 50% 15 VA
18647 HVA 16-RED 1517 16-18 47% 16 TX
18648 CID WR 14-Blue 1517 28-22 56% 14 ID
18649 NE Elite 16-Rio 1517 7-4 64% 16 NE
18650 ARVC 16-Black 1517 20-17 54% 16 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.