Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 371 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18501 Club OAHO 13-Red 1519 28-20 58% 13 CA
18502 Momentum 15-Gold 1519 30-30 50% 15 FL
18503 Tsunami 18-1 1519 20-14 59% 18 OR
18504 Networks Acad 17-1 1519 7-4 64% 17 AL
18505 Bootheel SMASH - Mayhem 11 1519 11-8 55% 11 MO
18506 Boiler Jrs 13-E black 1519 34-37 48% 13 IN
18507 CVC 15 Savannah 1519 9-7 41% 15
18508 TriState Crusaders 16-1 1519 2-2 50% 16 NE
18509 Ohana 14-Girls national 1519 2-3 40% 14 IA
18510 FUSION 13-Blue (NO) 1519 3-3 50% 13 MN
18511 Aloha Volleyball Club 12 Aloha Jrs - Pua'ilikea 1519 11-9 55% 12 CA
18512 LEVBC U16-Red 1519 23-20 50% 16 MD
18513 Mana Toa 13-Michaela 1519 16-10 62% 13 AL
18514 Prolink 15-Cassie 1519 33-32 51% 15 GA
18515 MVI 16-Natalie 1519 11-11 50% 16 ID
18516 Six Pack Legit 15-G holly 1519 3-2 60% 15 IA
18517 ZTV 12-4 silver 1519 12-7 63% 12 MT
18518 BWB 14-2 1519 5-4 56% 14 IL
18519 Momentum One 16-Tsunami 1519 18-17 51% 16 WA
18520 CVC 15-GREY 1519 13-11 54% 15 OH
18521 Focus 17-Todd 1519 2-3 40% 17
18522 Laker JO 13-1 1519 5-1 83% 13 MN
18523 CVC 15-1 1519 33-33 50% 15 MN
18524 Mem Metro 13-Elite red 1519 33-23 59% 13 TN
18525 Grandlake 17-Keber 1519 3-2 60% 17 OH
18526 PANTERA 12-Mobley/stout 1519 21-16 57% 12 IN
18527 SPVC AB 16-1 1519 6-6 50% 16 AB
18528 West Alabama Juniors 12 West Alabama Juniors Purple Storm (SO) 1519 9-5 64% 12 AL
18529 Rio Grande Elite 17-1 1519 8-5 62% 17 PR
18530 Rage 14-1 1519 14-9 61% 14 WI
18531 Lions 17-1 1519 2-6 25% 17 AB
18532 JM 10-White 1519 3-2 60% 10 TX
18533 RJSPT 14-1 1519 9-15 38% 14 NY
18534 DNVB 13-Red 1519 2-6 25% 13 MA
18535 Heat 12 1519 3-4 38% 12 OK
18536 KMS 12-Rudningen 1518 1-3 25% 12 MN
18537 LC Elite 12-1 black 1518 13-11 54% 12 OR
18538 Team 27 17 1518 7-3 70% 17 MI
18539 Beach South 14-Black 1518 5-10 33% 14 NC
18540 Big Cat Volleyball 13-1 1518 5-5 50% 13 IA
18541 RCV 14 1518 4-4 50% 14
18542 TX LEGACY 16 LIBERTY 1518 25-21 51% 16 TX
18543 Point Break BC Volleyball Club 15 1518 5-3 63% 15
18544 Elite Mountain 16 1518 11-12 48% 16 AZ
18545 Velocity Volleyball Club 15 1518 5-3 63% 15 AR
18546 OCR 17-White 1518 17-10 63% 17 CA
18547 Alpha 13-2 1518 31-30 51% 13 KY
18548 Shock 16-Ua spark 1518 26-19 58% 16 IL
18549 La Crosse Velocity 15-S ii 1518 3-1 75% 15 WI
18550 Lakeshore Storm 13 Whites 1518 12-11 52% 13 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.