Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 362 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18051 Exile 11 1524 2-1 50% 11 IA
18052 13 Torrington Elite Volleyball Club 14 TEVC Torrington Elite Volleyball Club 1524 3-1 75% 14 WY
18053 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 10-Blue 1524 15-10 60% 10 FL
18054 Topeka Elite 14-2 1524 14-9 61% 14 KS
18055 OCJ 14-Gold 1524 17-9 65% 14 OR
18056 LAVA West 15-Molten tf 1524 27-27 50% 15 CA
18057 United VBA 15-Gray 1524 18-17 50% 15 TX
18058 HOS 16U White 1524 20-13 61% 16 NY
18059 SMASH 13-Black elite 1523 19-14 51% 13 MO
18060 Ohana Storm 13-Chris 1523 21-19 53% 13 CA
18061 Legacy Elite VBA 11-L 1523 6-5 55% 11 OH
18062 BJ Patriots 12 1523 2-2 33% 12 AL
18063 Tampa North 15-Orange 1523 23-13 64% 15 FL
18064 NMBVB 16-Mariela 1523 6-3 67% 16 FL
18065 Eagles VBC 12-Blue 1523 4-3 50% 12 MI
18066 Pono 16-1 steven 1523 21-17 51% 16 TX
18067 AZ EVJ 16-T1-gilbert 1523 24-24 50% 16 AZ
18068 Katy Volleyball 16 Nike 1523 22-22 50% 16 TX
18069 Quantum Volleyball Acadmey 15 14 Hydrogen (FL) 1523 3-1 75% 15 FL
18070 Texas Impact 12-Pink 1523 2-2 40% 12 WA
18071 EKVC 15-Ug white 1523 6-2 75% 15
18072 Ft. Wayne VBC 12-Lightening 1523 10-11 48% 12 IN
18073 Ne Jrs 16-White 1523 6-5 55% 16 NE
18074 Tstreet SN 16-Ally 1523 24-29 45% 16 NV
18075 SRVC Surge 15 1523 42-20 68% 15 MD
18076 Vortex 16-Sandy 1523 14-9 58% 16 UT
18077 CCV 14-Purple 1523 15-10 60% 14 MN
18078 WAVE DRIVER 14-S 1523 2-2 50% 14 IN
18079 SUVA 11-1 1523 3-2 60% 11 OH
18080 Western Iowa Novas 11-1 1523 2-0 40% 11 IA
18081 Advantage 15-White 1523 26-29 47% 15 NC
18082 Raptors 13 1523 3-4 43% 13 UT
18083 LAVA North 16 Premier 1523 22-23 49% 16 CA
18084 Legacy Volleyball Club 15-National 1523 19-21 48% 15 NY
18085 Western Mass 14-Prowess 1523 5-1 56% 14 MA
18086 HOU STELLAR 11-Elite 1523 6-5 55% 11 TX
18087 Liberty Belles 16-S 1523 27-27 50% 16 IN
18088 DS Elite 13-Rise 1523 12-7 63% 13 TX
18089 Energy Surge 13-Coral 1523 2-1 67% 13 IL
18090 Vision 15 Kortney 1523 3-1 75% 15 GA
18091 Nebraska Volleyball Academy 17-Black 1523 2-1 67% 17 NE
18092 DBQ Thunder 14 1523 12-9 57% 14 IA
18093 Red Rock 13-Claudio - redwood city 1523 18-20 47% 13 CA
18094 Patriots 16-S 1523 3-1 75% 16 MN
18095 Playeros 17-1 amanda 1523 28-13 68% 17 FL
18096 VAVA 16-1 1523 6-15 29% 16 VA
18097 Top Flight 16 Theta 1523 34-24 59% 16 IL
18098 LTX Select Volleyball Club 16-1 1523 4-4 50% 16 TX
18099 ACT 16-Andy 1523 21-23 48% 16 CA
18100 EVA 11-Pink 1523 14-8 64% 11 AR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.