Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 361 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18001 City Beach 16-White 1524 32-22 59% 16 CA
18002 Tenacity 15-Hp 1524 32-28 53% 15 TN
18003 MVP 60450 14U Red 1524 16-11 59% 14 IL
18004 Onondaga Volleyball Club 12 Onondaga Blizzard 1524 6-3 67% 12 NY
18005 757 14-Silver 1524 32-24 57% 14 VA
18006 1915 Excel VC 16-1 1524 9-6 60% 16 FL
18007 Club Cactus 15-Red 1524 19-13 59% 15 AZ
18008 HC FLOW 14-Tsunami 1524 15-10 52% 14 TX
18009 CityLights 13-Black 1524 13-5 72% 13 IN
18010 Allegheny Volleyball Club 14-Black 1524 3-2 60% 14 PA
18011 Unity Volleyball Club 16 Unity Kona 1524 4-1 80% 16 MA
18012 PC Xtreme 16 1524 5-3 50% 16 IL
18013 SA Juniors 13 Baden 1524 26-29 47% 13 TX
18014 Fusion 18-Premier 1524 19-17 53% 18 VT
18015 CJVA 12-Onyx 1524 23-17 57% 12 NJ
18016 RISE 712-18-1 1524 12-9 57% 18 IA
18017 PAEVA 15-Black 1524 10-10 50% 15 PA
18018 CCJRS 15-1 1524 6-6 50% 15 GA
18019 H2 Alton 18-_ michelle 1524 23-17 57% 18 MO
18020 JAG VBC 14-2 national 1524 3-2 60% 14 WI
18021 Sierra SVC 16-Orange 1524 12-8 60% 16 CO
18022 De Pere Diggers 14-S white 1524 6-3 67% 14 WI
18023 Perfect Storm 12-1 1524 3-2 60% 12 MN
18024 CEV Sapphire 12-1 1524 4-4 50% 12 OH
18025 HOU STELLAR 16 SELECT 1524 25-19 57% 16 TX
18026 OYVBA 12-Blue 1524 3-2 60% 12 MN
18027 LEGACY 13-State will 1524 7-3 70% 13 FL
18028 Ignite AZ 15-National 2 1524 24-36 40% 15 AZ
18029 OT 13-J jenna 1524 1-8 11% 13 FL
18030 DVA 14-Premier 1524 25-19 56% 14 PA
18031 HEAT 12-White 1524 9-8 53% 12 TX
18032 Munciana 14-L cougars gray 1524 9-9 50% 14 IN
18033 Cape Fear 16-1 1524 5-4 56% 16 FL
18034 Red Storm 14-Nw 1524 8-8 50% 14 LA
18035 C1VB In-House MS 13-Liz j 1524 3-2 60% 13 SC
18036 AVB Fire 12-Red 1524 5-1 83% 12 MN
18037 Dominicos PR 16-Zayas 1524 3-2 60% 16 FL
18038 ENVY 15-Black 1524 7-6 50% 15 IA
18039 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 14 Weber Elite Trina B 1524 4-2 67% 14 UT
18040 WVC 12-Green 1524 18-13 58% 12 MN
18041 SVC NGV 13 Provine 1524 20-14 59% 13 GA
18042 Fusion 18-White 1524 19-22 46% 18 PA
18043 Rolling Thunder 13-Blue 1524 13-15 46% 13 IL
18044 Exile 11 1524 2-1 50% 11 IA
18045 13 Torrington Elite Volleyball Club 14 TEVC Torrington Elite Volleyball Club 1524 3-1 75% 14 WY
18046 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 10-Blue 1524 15-10 60% 10 FL
18047 OCJ 14-Gold 1524 17-9 65% 14 OR
18048 LAVA West 15-Molten tf 1524 27-27 50% 15 CA
18049 United VBA 15-Gray 1524 18-17 50% 15 TX
18050 VVA 11-Sanchez 1524 2-3 40% 11 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.