Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 360 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17951 Crown City Sports Academy 12-Crown 1525 21-19 53% 12 CA
17952 Boston United 17-National - dimitri 1525 37-34 52% 17 MA
17953 SOSVBC Sidoeut 16-N carly 1525 5-3 63% 16 NV
17954 Impulse 12-Black 1525 11-8 58% 12 IN
17955 Metrowest VBC 14-Diamond 1525 11-14 39% 14 MA
17956 Next 18-Blue 1525 20-16 56% 18 OH
17957 Waupaca Fire 13-Red 1525 6-3 67% 13 WI
17958 Insanity 14-National-haley 1525 1-3 20% 14 GA
17959 Academy 13-E falcons 1525 31-41 43% 13 IN
17960 MG Elite Volleyball Club 17-1 1525 4-3 57% 17
17961 Eastside 13-R ahrens 1525 4-2 67% 13 OH
17962 Parry 14 1524 6-3 67% 14 OH
17963 C2K Volleyball Club 18 18 Rammel (OV) 1524 5-1 83% 18
17964 HP South 10-Diamond 1524 8-6 53% 10 MO
17965 SA Elite 14-2 red 1524 21-23 48% 14 TX
17966 No Panic 15 Chris 1524 23-19 53% 15 VA
17967 Princeton 16-White 1524 11-12 48% 16 NJ
17968 Empire VBC 16-1 1524 2-4 20% 16 CA
17969 Blast Volleyball Club 13 13U Blast Black (KE) (15) 1524 5-5 50% 13 PA
17970 Mason Dixon Volleyball Club 16 16U Cinda (CH) 1524 10-9 50% 16
17971 TX VISION 11 1524 12-8 46% 11 TX
17972 AEV 13 National 1524 22-16 58% 13 TX
17973 Ballyhoo 14-Black 1524 15-11 58% 14 PA
17974 Club Unite 18-Lw gray 1524 21-11 66% 18 TN
17975 Iowa Select Evolution 13-Red 1524 4-2 67% 13 IA
17976 Westchester Pride 18 1524 6-7 46% 18 NJ
17977 Rival 13-White 1524 7-5 58% 13 NY
17978 Club North Volleyball KC 18-1 1524 4-3 57% 18 MO
17979 OCVB 12-Powell 1524 1-1 25% 12 ID
17980 ENVOL 12-1 1524 3-1 75% 12 PR
17981 VCN 16-Blue 1524 4-3 57% 16 NE
17982 City Beach 16-White 1524 32-22 59% 16 CA
17983 Tenacity 15-Hp 1524 32-28 53% 15 TN
17984 Madfrog East 16-Diamond 1524 13-12 43% 16
17985 MVP 60450 14U Red 1524 16-11 59% 14 IL
17986 Onondaga Volleyball Club 12 Onondaga Blizzard 1524 6-3 67% 12 NY
17987 757 14-Silver 1524 32-24 57% 14 VA
17988 1915 Excel VC 16-1 1524 9-6 60% 16 FL
17989 Club Cactus 15-Red 1524 19-13 59% 15 AZ
17990 HC FLOW 14-Tsunami 1524 15-10 52% 14 TX
17991 CityLights 13-Black 1524 13-5 72% 13 IN
17992 Allegheny Volleyball Club 14-Black 1524 3-2 60% 14 PA
17993 Unity Volleyball Club 16 Unity Kona 1524 4-1 80% 16 MA
17994 RYZE 15-1 premier 1524 9-13 35% 15
17995 PC Xtreme 16 1524 5-3 50% 16 IL
17996 SA Juniors 13 Baden 1524 26-29 47% 13 TX
17997 Fusion 18-Premier 1524 19-17 53% 18 VT
17998 CJVA 12-Onyx 1524 23-17 57% 12 NJ
17999 RISE 712-18-1 1524 12-9 57% 18 IA
18000 PAEVA 15-Black 1524 10-10 50% 15 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.