2025-2026 Season — Page 363 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18101 | EVA 11-Pink | 1523 | 14-8 | 64% | 11 | AR |
| 18102 | 417 Missouri Juniors 18-1 eagles | 1523 | 2-6 | 25% | 18 | MO |
| 18103 | PVA 11 National | 1523 | 4-8 | 33% | 11 | MO |
| 18104 | SCVC 15-1 natalie | 1523 | 12-8 | 60% | 15 | TN |
| 18105 | CWAVE Stacy 10 | 1523 | 5-6 | 45% | 10 | OH |
| 18106 | LTX SELECT 16-Blue | 1523 | 18-10 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 18107 | Shamrock VC 15 Celts | 1523 | 9-6 | 60% | 15 | |
| 18108 | PVA 15-Nike | 1523 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | MO |
| 18109 | GOLDENBULLS 18-G black | 1523 | 30-20 | 60% | 18 | FL |
| 18110 | HAVC 15-Girls | 1523 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | MN |
| 18111 | Boiler Jrs 15-R white | 1523 | 32-21 | 60% | 15 | IN |
| 18112 | GSI 18-Lime allan | 1523 | 22-20 | 52% | 18 | FL |
| 18113 | MAVA 17-1 | 1523 | 3-2 | 30% | 17 | MN |
| 18114 | NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 17-3 | 1523 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | GA |
| 18115 | Rhythm 16 Elite | 1523 | 24-16 | 57% | 16 | TN |
| 18116 | London Elite 13-Blue | 1523 | 3-3 | 50% | 13 | OH |
| 18117 | JNVBC 14-White | 1523 | 5-8 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 18118 | Laurel Elite 16-Maroon | 1523 | 8-6 | 50% | 16 | PA |
| 18119 | G - Force 13-A | 1523 | 9-5 | 60% | 13 | ID |
| 18120 | CJV 13-1 | 1523 | 13-8 | 62% | 13 | MN |
| 18121 | CPU 15 | 1523 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | IA |
| 18122 | BVBC 12-1 | 1523 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | IN |
| 18123 | Eastview 12-Blue | 1523 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 18124 | Trinity 15-Marysa | 1523 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | FL |
| 18125 | WAJ 14-White storm | 1523 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | AL |
| 18126 | NYC IMPACT 14-National | 1523 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | NJ |
| 18127 | CRYSTAL CITY DIAMONDS 13 | 1523 | 10-7 | 53% | 13 | NY |
| 18128 | FeVA 13 | 1523 | 24-21 | 53% | 13 | WA |
| 18129 | LAVA 13-2 | 1523 | 9-6 | 60% | 13 | OH |
| 18130 | SVC 14 Copper | 1523 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 18131 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 16-2 | 1523 | 4-4 | 36% | 16 | KY |
| 18132 | 757 18-Teal | 1523 | 31-23 | 57% | 18 | VA |
| 18133 | CityLights 15-Black | 1523 | 3-1 | 75% | 15 | IN |
| 18134 | Lady Strikers Silver 14 | 1523 | 12-13 | 48% | 14 | CO |
| 18135 | PVC 17-Blue | 1523 | 5-3 | 45% | 17 | TX |
| 18136 | LVC 15-Gold | 1523 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | NY |
| 18137 | LI Surge Volleyball Club 14-Premier blue | 1523 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | NY |
| 18138 | MGA 17-Stars | 1523 | 23-19 | 55% | 17 | MA |
| 18139 | P3R 13-Bloomfield | 1523 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | PA |
| 18140 | Temecula Viper 11-1 luci | 1523 | 15-12 | 56% | 11 | CA |
| 18141 | NPJ Salem 14 Premier | 1523 | 20-33 | 38% | 14 | OR |
| 18142 | High Desert Elite 17-E-ek | 1523 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | CO |
| 18143 | CYVB 15-1 | 1523 | 10-7 | 56% | 15 | MA |
| 18144 | Iowa Storm 18 | 1523 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | IA |
| 18145 | FC United 13 Teal | 1523 | 12-12 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 18146 | DIG 13-A western | 1523 | 1-1 | 50% | 13 | TX |
| 18147 | Xcel 13-Blue | 1523 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | AL |
| 18148 | BJ Patriots 12 | 1523 | 2-2 | 33% | 12 | AL |
| 18149 | Legacy Elite VBA 11-L | 1523 | 6-5 | 55% | 11 | OH |
| 18150 | A2 16-Green | 1523 | 34-22 | 61% | 16 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.