2025-2026 Season — Page 355 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17701 | Northeast 14-Orange | 1527 | 18-14 | 56% | 14 | CT |
| 17702 | Krush VBC 13 National | 1527 | 30-33 | 48% | 13 | MI |
| 17703 | NSSC 13-Black l | 1527 | 22-19 | 54% | 13 | MO |
| 17704 | KC Zoom 13-1 | 1527 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | MO |
| 17705 | SoCal VBC 16-Frazee | 1527 | 23-23 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 17706 | Alpha 12-2 | 1527 | 20-21 | 49% | 12 | KY |
| 17707 | Sandhills 16-Halle | 1527 | 29-26 | 53% | 16 | NC |
| 17708 | SOSVBC 16-T savannah | 1527 | 7-9 | 44% | 16 | NY |
| 17709 | Katy United 15-Molten | 1527 | 34-26 | 55% | 15 | TX |
| 17710 | AR SELECT 16-Ntl | 1527 | 17-15 | 50% | 16 | AR |
| 17711 | CB Juniors 10-S | 1527 | 9-11 | 45% | 10 | CA |
| 17712 | Avalanche 14-Blue | 1527 | 24-13 | 55% | 14 | MT |
| 17713 | HP Illinois 13-2 silver | 1527 | 23-18 | 56% | 13 | MO |
| 17714 | ZUMAZ 12-1 | 1527 | 3-6 | 27% | 12 | MN |
| 17715 | HPRIME 17-Gold | 1527 | 34-26 | 56% | 17 | TX |
| 17716 | Topeka Elite 17-1 | 1527 | 14-12 | 50% | 17 | KS |
| 17717 | PSVBC 14-Elite | 1527 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | WV |
| 17718 | C2 16-3 regional blue hannah | 1527 | 10-3 | 77% | 16 | TN |
| 17719 | RockCity 17-N4 | 1527 | 30-25 | 55% | 17 | OH |
| 17720 | Sports Academy VBC 14-Premier | 1527 | 1-6 | 14% | 14 | CA |
| 17721 | MN Attack 14-Black | 1527 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 17722 | Highland Lakes Aces 14U | 1527 | 11-6 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 17723 | CLUB STEEL 13-Myli | 1527 | 6-3 | 67% | 13 | FL |
| 17724 | Lakeview Volleyball 12-1 | 1527 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | SD |
| 17725 | Iowa United 17-2 elite | 1527 | 24-40 | 38% | 17 | IA |
| 17726 | HVA 17-Flares | 1527 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | PR |
| 17727 | New Age 14-Showcase | 1527 | 19-18 | 51% | 14 | TX |
| 17728 | Pursuit 12 Elite | 1527 | 17-23 | 41% | 12 | MO |
| 17729 | Katy Volleyball 13-Nike | 1527 | 17-12 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 17730 | Desert Elite 17 | 1527 | 22-24 | 48% | 17 | CA |
| 17731 | Ohana 14-Girls regional | 1527 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | IA |
| 17732 | Ka Ulukoa 16-Joe | 1527 | 33-42 | 44% | 16 | HI |
| 17733 | Madfrog 13-E black | 1527 | 18-20 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 17734 | Carolina Aces Volleyball Club 13 Carolina Aces 1's | 1527 | 8-4 | 67% | 13 | |
| 17735 | PC Elite 12-1 | 1527 | 2-2 | 40% | 12 | TX |
| 17736 | Coleville Volleyball Club 18 Coleville Volleyball Club (3) | 1527 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | |
| 17737 | Ballyhoo 13-Black | 1527 | 12-10 | 55% | 13 | PA |
| 17738 | SOVC Caudill 17-R | 1527 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | OH |
| 17739 | SSWolfpack 13-Jackals | 1527 | 17-8 | 68% | 13 | MA |
| 17740 | Hunter's 13-Sanchez | 1527 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | FL |
| 17741 | Billtown 15-Pink | 1527 | 2-2 | 40% | 15 | PA |
| 17742 | Delano 12-3 | 1527 | 2-1 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 17743 | Dubuque Elite Gold 14 | 1527 | 1-0 | 25% | 14 | IA |
| 17744 | SMASH 13-Thunder | 1527 | 30-31 | 49% | 13 | MA |
| 17745 | HVVC 13-Black | 1527 | 22-11 | 67% | 13 | MI |
| 17746 | ECC 17-National jameel | 1527 | 24-29 | 45% | 17 | NJ |
| 17747 | Wild Bunch 11-S | 1527 | 7-5 | 58% | 11 | MO |
| 17748 | RADD Elite 18-1 | 1527 | 23-21 | 52% | 18 | FL |
| 17749 | Basin Bombers 14-1 | 1527 | 15-13 | 54% | 14 | OR |
| 17750 | Alliance 18 Local | 1527 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | TN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.