Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 355 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17701 Northeast 14-Orange 1527 18-14 56% 14 CT
17702 Krush VBC 13 National 1527 30-33 48% 13 MI
17703 NSSC 13-Black l 1527 22-19 54% 13 MO
17704 KC Zoom 13-1 1527 4-1 80% 13 MO
17705 SoCal VBC 16-Frazee 1527 23-23 50% 16 CA
17706 Alpha 12-2 1527 20-21 49% 12 KY
17707 Sandhills 16-Halle 1527 29-26 53% 16 NC
17708 SOSVBC 16-T savannah 1527 7-9 44% 16 NY
17709 Katy United 15-Molten 1527 34-26 55% 15 TX
17710 AR SELECT 16-Ntl 1527 17-15 50% 16 AR
17711 CB Juniors 10-S 1527 9-11 45% 10 CA
17712 Avalanche 14-Blue 1527 24-13 55% 14 MT
17713 HP Illinois 13-2 silver 1527 23-18 56% 13 MO
17714 ZUMAZ 12-1 1527 3-6 27% 12 MN
17715 HPRIME 17-Gold 1527 34-26 56% 17 TX
17716 Topeka Elite 17-1 1527 14-12 50% 17 KS
17717 PSVBC 14-Elite 1527 3-2 60% 14 WV
17718 C2 16-3 regional blue hannah 1527 10-3 77% 16 TN
17719 RockCity 17-N4 1527 30-25 55% 17 OH
17720 Sports Academy VBC 14-Premier 1527 1-6 14% 14 CA
17721 MN Attack 14-Black 1527 6-4 60% 14 MN
17722 Highland Lakes Aces 14U 1527 11-6 58% 14 TX
17723 CLUB STEEL 13-Myli 1527 6-3 67% 13 FL
17724 Lakeview Volleyball 12-1 1527 3-1 75% 12 SD
17725 Iowa United 17-2 elite 1527 24-40 38% 17 IA
17726 HVA 17-Flares 1527 6-1 86% 17 PR
17727 New Age 14-Showcase 1527 19-18 51% 14 TX
17728 Pursuit 12 Elite 1527 17-23 41% 12 MO
17729 Katy Volleyball 13-Nike 1527 17-12 57% 13 TX
17730 Desert Elite 17 1527 22-24 48% 17 CA
17731 Ohana 14-Girls regional 1527 2-3 40% 14 IA
17732 Ka Ulukoa 16-Joe 1527 33-42 44% 16 HI
17733 Madfrog 13-E black 1527 18-20 41% 13 TX
17734 Carolina Aces Volleyball Club 13 Carolina Aces 1's 1527 8-4 67% 13
17735 PC Elite 12-1 1527 2-2 40% 12 TX
17736 Coleville Volleyball Club 18 Coleville Volleyball Club (3) 1527 4-4 50% 18
17737 Ballyhoo 13-Black 1527 12-10 55% 13 PA
17738 SOVC Caudill 17-R 1527 5-4 56% 17 OH
17739 SSWolfpack 13-Jackals 1527 17-8 68% 13 MA
17740 Hunter's 13-Sanchez 1527 4-1 80% 13 FL
17741 Billtown 15-Pink 1527 2-2 40% 15 PA
17742 Delano 12-3 1527 2-1 50% 12 MN
17743 Dubuque Elite Gold 14 1527 1-0 25% 14 IA
17744 SMASH 13-Thunder 1527 30-31 49% 13 MA
17745 HVVC 13-Black 1527 22-11 67% 13 MI
17746 ECC 17-National jameel 1527 24-29 45% 17 NJ
17747 Wild Bunch 11-S 1527 7-5 58% 11 MO
17748 RADD Elite 18-1 1527 23-21 52% 18 FL
17749 Basin Bombers 14-1 1527 15-13 54% 14 OR
17750 Alliance 18 Local 1527 20-10 67% 18 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.