Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 356 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17751 Lakeview Volleyball 12-1 1527 3-1 75% 12 SD
17752 Iowa United 17-2 elite 1527 24-40 38% 17 IA
17753 HVA 17-Flares 1527 6-1 86% 17 PR
17754 New Age 14-Showcase 1527 19-18 51% 14 TX
17755 Katy Volleyball 13-Nike 1527 17-12 57% 13 TX
17756 Desert Elite 17 1527 22-24 48% 17 CA
17757 Ballyhoo 13-Black 1527 12-10 55% 13 PA
17758 SOVC Caudill 17-R 1527 5-4 56% 17 OH
17759 SSWolfpack 13-Jackals 1527 17-8 68% 13 MA
17760 Hunter's 13-Sanchez 1527 4-1 80% 13 FL
17761 Delano 12-3 1527 2-1 50% 12 MN
17762 SMASH 13-Thunder 1527 30-31 49% 13 MA
17763 HVVC 13-Black 1527 22-11 67% 13 MI
17764 ECC 17-National jameel 1527 24-29 45% 17 NJ
17765 Wild Bunch 11-S 1527 7-5 58% 11 MO
17766 RADD Elite 18-1 1527 23-21 52% 18 FL
17767 Basin Bombers 14-1 1527 15-13 54% 14 OR
17768 Alliance 18 Local 1527 20-10 67% 18 TN
17769 FVC 18 Prime 1527 29-19 59% 18 MD
17770 IMPACT 14-1s 1527 6-5 55% 14 TX
17771 MBTV 13-Red 1527 14-12 54% 13 OH
17772 Northridge 10-Emma 1527 2-1 67% 10 IN
17773 RVT 12-2 swim 1527 12-12 50% 12 NY
17774 SLV Divers 14U 1526 10-9 53% 14 VA
17775 Networks Acad 14-3 1526 12-6 44% 14 AL
17776 JNVBC 12-Teal 1526 7-4 50% 12 IA
17777 No Limits 17-Silver 1526 14-6 70% 17 IA
17778 Peak VA 16-Blue 1526 22-23 45% 16 TX
17779 Y Not 18-1 1526 15-8 65% 18 VA
17780 SF Elite 16-Stella 1526 21-28 43% 16 CA
17781 WF Elite 16-Black 1526 14-15 45% 16 TX
17782 Surge 18-Black 1526 21-16 57% 18 PA
17783 Allegiance 17 Royal 1526 20-22 48% 17 TX
17784 Columbus Classics 11-1 1526 5-5 38% 11 TX
17785 Southern Heat 16U 1526 9-5 64% 16 WI
17786 JAGS 17-1 1526 3-1 75% 17 MN
17787 AVC Nebraska 14-Black 1526 8-15 32% 14 NE
17788 adidas DYNASTY 17-3 1526 3-2 60% 17 KS
17789 CCVB 16-2 1526 6-7 46% 16 IL
17790 CNVKC Mizuno 18-Molly 1526 20-19 51% 18 MO
17791 Bandits 16-2 1526 5-3 50% 16 AL
17792 Underwood Slammers 17-1 1526 19-10 66% 17 MN
17793 ARVC 15-White 1526 6-3 67% 15 NV
17794 A5 13-Miguelangel 1526 2-3 40% 13 GA
17795 Four1Nine Xtreme 13 13-King (OV) (12) 1526 3-1 75% 13 OH
17796 OMNI 13 Elite 1526 28-28 50% 13 CA
17797 SFSVC 17-1 kiran 1526 27-13 68% 17 NM
17798 Idaho ONE 17-White 1526 31-26 53% 17 ID
17799 MAVS KC Select 10-1 1526 5-1 83% 10 KS
17800 MAVS KC 10-1 1526 6-1 86% 10 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.