2025-2026 Season — Page 357 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17801 | Dewitt-Niemann 11U | 1526 | 5-6 | 33% | 11 | IA |
| 17802 | Rage 11-Frei | 1526 | 13-6 | 68% | 11 | CA |
| 17803 | Maunalani 18-Rise 2 | 1526 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | HI |
| 17804 | Rosebud Rebels 14 | 1526 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | MT |
| 17805 | Mojo 14-White | 1526 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 17806 | MoCo Volleyball Club 13 MOCO Majestics | 1526 | 21-16 | 54% | 13 | |
| 17807 | A5 Gwinnett 13-Mary | 1526 | 23-26 | 47% | 13 | GA |
| 17808 | Iowa Vibe 16-1 | 1526 | 2-2 | 40% | 16 | IA |
| 17809 | HCA 17-1 | 1526 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | TX |
| 17810 | Falcon Fever 12 | 1526 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 17811 | CHAMP 18-1 | 1526 | 11-6 | 65% | 18 | AL |
| 17812 | MOD Elite 14-Gold | 1526 | 32-35 | 48% | 14 | IL |
| 17813 | KCV 14 REGIONAL | 1526 | 22-17 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 17814 | IVC 13-Tiffany | 1526 | 9-5 | 45% | 13 | TX |
| 17815 | Manhattan Mamba 12-1 | 1526 | 8-2 | 73% | 12 | KS |
| 17816 | Guns Up VBC 13 Elite | 1526 | 15-17 | 47% | 13 | TX |
| 17817 | Next Level 12-1 christian | 1526 | 11-6 | 65% | 12 | PR |
| 17818 | HEAT 15-National junior | 1526 | 24-19 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 17819 | SUVA 11-2 | 1526 | 4-2 | 67% | 11 | OH |
| 17820 | United 14 Navy | 1526 | 13-12 | 52% | 14 | AL |
| 17821 | TX FLAMES 14-Fire | 1526 | 13-7 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 17822 | NE D-League 15-Red | 1526 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | IA |
| 17823 | Supernova 15 Gold | 1526 | 22-20 | 52% | 15 | CA |
| 17824 | Hub City 15u | 1526 | 35-20 | 64% | 15 | MD |
| 17825 | EEVB 12-L red | 1526 | 9-7 | 53% | 12 | GA |
| 17826 | Greensburg VBC 16 | 1526 | 12-11 | 48% | 16 | PA |
| 17827 | Texas One 12-Royal | 1526 | 11-8 | 58% | 12 | TX |
| 17828 | WB 16-S | 1526 | 16-10 | 55% | 16 | MO |
| 17829 | purple storm 15-2 | 1526 | 6-3 | 55% | 15 | AL |
| 17830 | CRU Performance 15 | 1526 | 28-33 | 46% | 15 | WA |
| 17831 | NM Rev 13-Andrue | 1526 | 17-15 | 53% | 13 | NM |
| 17832 | HRVC 15-American white | 1526 | 12-10 | 55% | 15 | NC |
| 17833 | RAJO 12-Black | 1526 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | MN |
| 17834 | Wind 15 | 1526 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | OK |
| 17835 | K2 13-Stripes | 1526 | 20-23 | 47% | 13 | TN |
| 17836 | Moxie Max 18-1 | 1526 | 18-20 | 47% | 18 | KY |
| 17837 | CEVC 18-1 | 1526 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | NY |
| 17838 | Smashers 14 | 1526 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | IN |
| 17839 | FEVA 17-Courtney | 1526 | 32-37 | 46% | 17 | FL |
| 17840 | Falls Focus 12-Red | 1526 | 13-6 | 68% | 12 | WI |
| 17841 | OVA 12-Elite kira | 1526 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 17842 | LCVC 12-Red | 1526 | 9-8 | 53% | 12 | IN |
| 17843 | EPVA 13-Black | 1526 | 10-9 | 53% | 13 | MN |
| 17844 | Oquirrh Peak 2026 14 Oquirrh Peak 2026 LINDSAY/AIONA | 1526 | 9-11 | 39% | 14 | UT |
| 17845 | WVBA 14-Black | 1526 | 32-27 | 54% | 14 | WA |
| 17846 | TVBC 18-1 | 1526 | 3-1 | 75% | 18 | CO |
| 17847 | Horseshoe VBC 13-Black | 1526 | 12-11 | 46% | 13 | PA |
| 17848 | GVR 13-R | 1526 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | IA |
| 17849 | Rapid Fire 13-White | 1526 | 12-9 | 57% | 13 | IL |
| 17850 | Club Ace 12 | 1526 | 19-11 | 63% | 12 | OK |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.