Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 357 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17801 Dewitt-Niemann 11U 1526 5-6 33% 11 IA
17802 Rage 11-Frei 1526 13-6 68% 11 CA
17803 Maunalani 18-Rise 2 1526 5-2 71% 18 HI
17804 Rosebud Rebels 14 1526 5-1 83% 14 MT
17805 Mojo 14-White 1526 7-5 58% 14 TX
17806 MoCo Volleyball Club 13 MOCO Majestics 1526 21-16 54% 13
17807 A5 Gwinnett 13-Mary 1526 23-26 47% 13 GA
17808 Iowa Vibe 16-1 1526 2-2 40% 16 IA
17809 HCA 17-1 1526 3-4 43% 17 TX
17810 Falcon Fever 12 1526 4-2 67% 12 MN
17811 CHAMP 18-1 1526 11-6 65% 18 AL
17812 MOD Elite 14-Gold 1526 32-35 48% 14 IL
17813 KCV 14 REGIONAL 1526 22-17 56% 14 TX
17814 IVC 13-Tiffany 1526 9-5 45% 13 TX
17815 Manhattan Mamba 12-1 1526 8-2 73% 12 KS
17816 Guns Up VBC 13 Elite 1526 15-17 47% 13 TX
17817 Next Level 12-1 christian 1526 11-6 65% 12 PR
17818 HEAT 15-National junior 1526 24-19 56% 15 CA
17819 SUVA 11-2 1526 4-2 67% 11 OH
17820 United 14 Navy 1526 13-12 52% 14 AL
17821 TX FLAMES 14-Fire 1526 13-7 57% 14 TX
17822 NE D-League 15-Red 1526 3-2 60% 15 IA
17823 Supernova 15 Gold 1526 22-20 52% 15 CA
17824 Hub City 15u 1526 35-20 64% 15 MD
17825 EEVB 12-L red 1526 9-7 53% 12 GA
17826 Greensburg VBC 16 1526 12-11 48% 16 PA
17827 Texas One 12-Royal 1526 11-8 58% 12 TX
17828 WB 16-S 1526 16-10 55% 16 MO
17829 purple storm 15-2 1526 6-3 55% 15 AL
17830 CRU Performance 15 1526 28-33 46% 15 WA
17831 NM Rev 13-Andrue 1526 17-15 53% 13 NM
17832 HRVC 15-American white 1526 12-10 55% 15 NC
17833 RAJO 12-Black 1526 7-6 54% 12 MN
17834 Wind 15 1526 7-3 70% 15 OK
17835 K2 13-Stripes 1526 20-23 47% 13 TN
17836 Moxie Max 18-1 1526 18-20 47% 18 KY
17837 CEVC 18-1 1526 6-2 75% 18 NY
17838 Smashers 14 1526 4-2 67% 14 IN
17839 FEVA 17-Courtney 1526 32-37 46% 17 FL
17840 Falls Focus 12-Red 1526 13-6 68% 12 WI
17841 OVA 12-Elite kira 1526 5-2 71% 12 CA
17842 LCVC 12-Red 1526 9-8 53% 12 IN
17843 EPVA 13-Black 1526 10-9 53% 13 MN
17844 Oquirrh Peak 2026 14 Oquirrh Peak 2026 LINDSAY/AIONA 1526 9-11 39% 14 UT
17845 WVBA 14-Black 1526 32-27 54% 14 WA
17846 TVBC 18-1 1526 3-1 75% 18 CO
17847 Horseshoe VBC 13-Black 1526 12-11 46% 13 PA
17848 GVR 13-R 1526 1-1 25% 13 IA
17849 Rapid Fire 13-White 1526 12-9 57% 13 IL
17850 Club Ace 12 1526 19-11 63% 12 OK
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.