2025-2026 Season — Page 354 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17651 | Nebraska ONE 12-Storm | 1528 | 9-13 | 41% | 12 | NE |
| 17652 | 1W 13 Onyx | 1528 | 13-7 | 65% | 13 | WI |
| 17653 | Elevate 13-Silver | 1528 | 26-21 | 46% | 13 | TX |
| 17654 | Roots 15-4 mesquite | 1528 | 21-15 | 58% | 15 | TX |
| 17655 | IGNITE 12-Black | 1528 | 12-10 | 55% | 12 | OH |
| 17656 | TEJAS 17-Black arthur | 1528 | 18-24 | 42% | 17 | TX |
| 17657 | E2 13-Emerald | 1528 | 6-3 | 67% | 13 | KY |
| 17658 | Lawrence Landsharks 15-2 | 1528 | 14-5 | 61% | 15 | KS |
| 17659 | NASA BHM 15-BLACK | 1528 | 17-17 | 50% | 15 | AL |
| 17660 | TXP 16-Black alex | 1528 | 25-28 | 45% | 16 | TX |
| 17661 | HVA 14-Rb red | 1528 | 13-15 | 46% | 14 | TX |
| 17662 | Ignite Volleyball Club Minot 12-Blaze | 1528 | 3-2 | 33% | 12 | ND |
| 17663 | Tenacity 13-1 | 1528 | 13-10 | 57% | 13 | WI |
| 17664 | Dinamite 15-Courtney | 1528 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 17665 | Dynamite Adidas 16-2 | 1528 | 25-30 | 45% | 16 | MI |
| 17666 | JJVA Club 12-D | 1528 | 10-5 | 67% | 12 | FL |
| 17667 | RCVS 11-1 rosy | 1528 | 4-2 | 67% | 11 | PR |
| 17668 | Columbus 12-3 | 1528 | 14-6 | 58% | 12 | MT |
| 17669 | LRVA 14-Blue | 1528 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | |
| 17670 | Rosemount 12-2 | 1528 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 17671 | BVC 11-White | 1528 | 6-4 | 55% | 11 | NE |
| 17672 | GSA 18-Larissa | 1528 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | HI |
| 17673 | 513VB 15-1 | 1528 | 16-33 | 33% | 15 | OH |
| 17674 | Dig Deep 18-Silver | 1528 | 11-4 | 69% | 18 | NH |
| 17675 | CG 14-Blue | 1528 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | WA |
| 17676 | JTown Juniors 11 | 1528 | 22-14 | 56% | 11 | AR |
| 17677 | PC Elite 12-1 | 1527 | 2-2 | 40% | 12 | TX |
| 17678 | Pursuit 12 Elite | 1527 | 17-23 | 41% | 12 | MO |
| 17679 | Ka Ulukoa 16-Joe | 1527 | 33-42 | 44% | 16 | HI |
| 17680 | Ohana 14-Girls regional | 1527 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | IA |
| 17681 | Billtown 15-Pink | 1527 | 2-2 | 40% | 15 | PA |
| 17682 | Madfrog 13-E black | 1527 | 18-20 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 17683 | Cottage Grove 16-1 | 1527 | 13-9 | 59% | 16 | MN |
| 17684 | Carolina Aces Volleyball Club 13 Carolina Aces 1's | 1527 | 8-4 | 67% | 13 | |
| 17685 | MVIce 14-R kyla | 1527 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | ID |
| 17686 | Podio 16-1 | 1527 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | WA |
| 17687 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17-National red | 1527 | 20-37 | 35% | 17 | NV |
| 17688 | Coleville Volleyball Club 18 Coleville Volleyball Club (3) | 1527 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | |
| 17689 | INDIANOLAPURPLE 14 | 1527 | 2-1 | 40% | 14 | IA |
| 17690 | DUBUQUE BLAZE 17 | 1527 | 6-4 | 60% | 17 | IA |
| 17691 | PVC 12-1b | 1527 | 12-7 | 63% | 12 | FL |
| 17692 | Dubuque Elite Gold 14 | 1527 | 1-0 | 25% | 14 | IA |
| 17693 | Augusta Juniors Volleyball Club 15-Becki | 1527 | 22-16 | 58% | 15 | GA |
| 17694 | VCN 13-Blue | 1527 | 4-3 | 57% | 13 | NE |
| 17695 | Laker JO 11-S | 1527 | 1-1 | 50% | 11 | MN |
| 17696 | PVA 11-Gray | 1527 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | MO |
| 17697 | High Line 17 Renegades | 1527 | 21-23 | 48% | 17 | PA |
| 17698 | Marshall JO 11-Black | 1527 | 6-7 | 46% | 11 | MN |
| 17699 | Vibe 17-Rami | 1527 | 18-15 | 55% | 17 | GA |
| 17700 | Idaho Show 16-Natl plum | 1527 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | ID |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.