Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 354 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17651 Nebraska ONE 12-Storm 1528 9-13 41% 12 NE
17652 1W 13 Onyx 1528 13-7 65% 13 WI
17653 Elevate 13-Silver 1528 26-21 46% 13 TX
17654 Roots 15-4 mesquite 1528 21-15 58% 15 TX
17655 IGNITE 12-Black 1528 12-10 55% 12 OH
17656 TEJAS 17-Black arthur 1528 18-24 42% 17 TX
17657 E2 13-Emerald 1528 6-3 67% 13 KY
17658 Lawrence Landsharks 15-2 1528 14-5 61% 15 KS
17659 NASA BHM 15-BLACK 1528 17-17 50% 15 AL
17660 TXP 16-Black alex 1528 25-28 45% 16 TX
17661 HVA 14-Rb red 1528 13-15 46% 14 TX
17662 Ignite Volleyball Club Minot 12-Blaze 1528 3-2 33% 12 ND
17663 Tenacity 13-1 1528 13-10 57% 13 WI
17664 Dinamite 15-Courtney 1528 5-3 63% 15 CA
17665 Dynamite Adidas 16-2 1528 25-30 45% 16 MI
17666 JJVA Club 12-D 1528 10-5 67% 12 FL
17667 RCVS 11-1 rosy 1528 4-2 67% 11 PR
17668 Columbus 12-3 1528 14-6 58% 12 MT
17669 LRVA 14-Blue 1528 2-2 50% 14
17670 Rosemount 12-2 1528 4-2 67% 12 MN
17671 BVC 11-White 1528 6-4 55% 11 NE
17672 GSA 18-Larissa 1528 3-2 60% 18 HI
17673 513VB 15-1 1528 16-33 33% 15 OH
17674 Dig Deep 18-Silver 1528 11-4 69% 18 NH
17675 CG 14-Blue 1528 3-5 38% 14 WA
17676 JTown Juniors 11 1528 22-14 56% 11 AR
17677 PC Elite 12-1 1527 2-2 40% 12 TX
17678 Pursuit 12 Elite 1527 17-23 41% 12 MO
17679 Ka Ulukoa 16-Joe 1527 33-42 44% 16 HI
17680 Ohana 14-Girls regional 1527 2-3 40% 14 IA
17681 Billtown 15-Pink 1527 2-2 40% 15 PA
17682 Madfrog 13-E black 1527 18-20 41% 13 TX
17683 Cottage Grove 16-1 1527 13-9 59% 16 MN
17684 Carolina Aces Volleyball Club 13 Carolina Aces 1's 1527 8-4 67% 13
17685 MVIce 14-R kyla 1527 7-5 58% 14 ID
17686 Podio 16-1 1527 2-5 29% 16 WA
17687 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17-National red 1527 20-37 35% 17 NV
17688 Coleville Volleyball Club 18 Coleville Volleyball Club (3) 1527 4-4 50% 18
17689 INDIANOLAPURPLE 14 1527 2-1 40% 14 IA
17690 DUBUQUE BLAZE 17 1527 6-4 60% 17 IA
17691 PVC 12-1b 1527 12-7 63% 12 FL
17692 Dubuque Elite Gold 14 1527 1-0 25% 14 IA
17693 Augusta Juniors Volleyball Club 15-Becki 1527 22-16 58% 15 GA
17694 VCN 13-Blue 1527 4-3 57% 13 NE
17695 Laker JO 11-S 1527 1-1 50% 11 MN
17696 PVA 11-Gray 1527 3-2 60% 11 MO
17697 High Line 17 Renegades 1527 21-23 48% 17 PA
17698 Marshall JO 11-Black 1527 6-7 46% 11 MN
17699 Vibe 17-Rami 1527 18-15 55% 17 GA
17700 Idaho Show 16-Natl plum 1527 4-4 50% 16 ID
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.