Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 353 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17601 Empire 16-1 premier 1528 12-7 63% 16 KS
17602 Summit 17 Sapphire 1528 19-11 63% 17 CO
17603 DBQ Insanity 17-1 national 1528 24-19 56% 17 IA
17604 LES 14 EmmaH 1528 12-10 55% 14 AL
17605 Storm 15-1 1528 5-5 45% 15 SD
17606 Vienna Elite 14 Travel 1528 28-45 38% 14 VA
17607 BVC - 15-Purple 1528 5-2 71% 15 IA
17608 RockwoodThunder 11-Carolina 1528 19-16 53% 11 MO
17609 United 16-Blue 1528 13-15 46% 16 AL
17610 208 16-Blue 1528 17-16 52% 16 ID
17611 UVA 15-National 1528 2-1 50% 15 LA
17612 Georgian Cubs Volleyball Club 17 Georgian Cubs Carnage 1528 4-4 50% 17
17613 FTLUTD Fusion 16-Winston 1528 4-7 36% 16 FL
17614 Club OAHO 15-Black 1528 24-17 59% 15 CA
17615 Kelowna Volleyball Club 14-Red 1528 4-4 50% 14
17616 BVA - Lions 14 1528 27-23 54% 14 IL
17617 BWB 16-1 1528 14-8 61% 16 IL
17618 Madtown 16-3 national 1528 31-26 54% 16 WI
17619 Matrix 16-1 1528 28-20 58% 16 IA
17620 Sharks 14 Silver 1528 38-24 61% 14 AL
17621 DBQ County WDVB-Rally Cats 11-G 1528 4-2 67% 11 IA
17622 Munciana Indy 16 Rams 1528 24-46 34% 16 IN
17623 Viperes 15-White 1528 4-2 67% 15 PA
17624 Battle 13-Tim 1528 21-16 55% 13 VA
17625 Rancho 16-Select kai 1528 18-22 45% 16 CA
17626 Kokoro 15-White 1528 19-12 61% 15 OH
17627 Triple Attack 16-Black yun 1528 29-25 54% 16 IL
17628 GCVC 15-Blue 1528 29-28 51% 15 OH
17629 Rapid Fire 15-Blue 1528 16-16 50% 15 IL
17630 Nebraska ONE 12-Storm 1528 9-13 41% 12 NE
17631 1W 13 Onyx 1528 13-7 65% 13 WI
17632 Elevate 13-Silver 1528 26-21 46% 13 TX
17633 Roots 15-4 mesquite 1528 21-15 58% 15 TX
17634 IGNITE 12-Black 1528 12-10 55% 12 OH
17635 TEJAS 17-Black arthur 1528 18-24 42% 17 TX
17636 E2 13-Emerald 1528 6-3 67% 13 KY
17637 Lawrence Landsharks 15-2 1528 14-5 61% 15 KS
17638 NASA BHM 15-BLACK 1528 17-17 50% 15 AL
17639 TXP 16-Black alex 1528 25-28 45% 16 TX
17640 HVA 14-Rb red 1528 13-15 46% 14 TX
17641 Ignite Volleyball Club Minot 12-Blaze 1528 3-2 33% 12 ND
17642 Tenacity 13-1 1528 13-10 57% 13 WI
17643 Dinamite 15-Courtney 1528 5-3 63% 15 CA
17644 Dynamite Adidas 16-2 1528 25-30 45% 16 MI
17645 JJVA Club 12-D 1528 10-5 67% 12 FL
17646 RCVS 11-1 rosy 1528 4-2 67% 11 PR
17647 Columbus 12-3 1528 14-6 58% 12 MT
17648 LRVA 14-Blue 1528 2-2 50% 14
17649 Rosemount 12-2 1528 4-2 67% 12 MN
17650 BVC 11-White 1528 6-4 55% 11 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.