Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 352 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17551 TAV Houston 13-Royal 1529 12-12 46% 13 TX
17552 M2 Volleyball 16-N2 1529 24-16 60% 16 GA
17553 Mana Toa 15-1 1529 3-2 60% 15 AL
17554 DBQ Insanity CVBC Vollocity 13 1529 3-2 60% 13 IA
17555 575 17-Pcna tina 1529 35-34 51% 17 GA
17556 TX IMPACT 13-Hybrid pink 1529 7-9 44% 13 TX
17557 Upontop 16-S elite 1529 26-41 39% 16 FL
17558 KMS SAINTS JO 12-Ruf 1529 2-1 40% 12 MN
17559 BVA 15-N quan 1529 10-16 38% 15 FL
17560 DVC 13-Gray 1529 5-4 56% 13 OH
17561 DVC 12-Gray 1529 5-4 56% 12 OH
17562 Impact 15-Keyden 1529 18-20 47% 15 MI
17563 Club Fusion 14-Fire spring 1529 7-3 58% 14 IL
17564 Rams Juniors 14-G black 1529 3-2 60% 14 IA
17565 Tamales 12-2 1529 3-2 60% 12 MO
17566 SPVC 15-1 adidas 1529 3-2 60% 15 CA
17567 Husky 15-New england white 1529 16-11 59% 15 CT
17568 Texas Fury 11 Impact 1529 16-11 57% 11 TX
17569 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Blackout 1529 9-8 53% 14 TX
17570 Borderline 14-Attack 1529 6-5 55% 14 OH
17571 Academy 17-R avalanche 1529 27-19 59% 17 IN
17572 LOSO 15-2 brea 1529 3-1 75% 15 OH
17573 RVC 17 National 1529 33-42 44% 17 VA
17574 Premier Nebraska 18-Red 1529 18-17 51% 18 NE
17575 PVA 18-Gray - attack 1529 11-14 41% 18 MO
17576 Surge 18-1 eb 1529 16-16 50% 18 AL
17577 308 Elite VBC 14-Pink 1529 5-1 71% 14
17578 Club Apex 18-White 1529 9-5 64% 18 KY
17579 HPSTL 10-Orange 1529 18-15 51% 10 MO
17580 BEVBC 18 Navy 1529 22-17 56% 18 MD
17581 WVBA 15-Red 1529 37-26 59% 15 WA
17582 Hawks 18-Lathrop 1529 25-21 54% 18 CT
17583 Diablo Black 18-1 1529 4-3 57% 18 CA
17584 Grandlake 18-Binkley 1529 3-3 50% 18 OH
17585 Marion Magic 11 1529 9-10 41% 11 IA
17586 DBQ Elite Gold 14 1529 11-11 42% 14 IA
17587 A5 West 12-1 1528 63-55 53% 12 GA
17588 Club Rampage Volleyball 13 Rampage Amber 1528 8-6 44% 13 UT
17589 Hoopa 14 1528 6-4 60% 14
17590 GCVBC 15-Williamson 1528 29-29 50% 15 OH
17591 Ohana 16-Girls regional 1528 3-2 60% 16 IA
17592 CALI 14-Gold north 1528 32-22 59% 14 NY
17593 Shoebox Volleyball 15-1 1528 20-10 65% 15 MI
17594 HP Illinois 12-Blue 1528 2-1 67% 12 MO
17595 EEVC 14-S blue 1528 12-6 67% 14 CA
17596 Rockets Volleyball 12 Hawthorne Jr High 7th 1528 3-1 75% 12 NV
17597 Impact 16-Courtney 1528 8-3 73% 16 MI
17598 ATOMIC 17-Smack national 1528 36-33 52% 17 AZ
17599 Infinity 15-State teal 1528 24-14 63% 15 OH
17600 BTownVBC 14-Ruby 1528 12-11 52% 14 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.