Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 351 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17501 FVBC 15-Regional red 1529 21-12 50% 15 MD
17502 HEAT 11-Heat 1529 9-7 56% 11 FL
17503 Foothills 14-Teal 1529 22-20 52% 14 WA
17504 Blue Angels 14-Black 1529 4-3 57% 14 CA
17505 UVA 14-S national 1529 3-1 75% 14 LA
17506 NRG 15-National navy 1529 23-17 56% 15 TX
17507 MN CORE 14-2 1529 10-10 50% 14 MN
17508 FVC 16-Wave 1529 27-19 57% 16 MD
17509 TX Premier 17-Club 1529 20-12 63% 17 TX
17510 Club Net 13 Premier 1529 22-26 46% 13 AR
17511 IOWA VIBE OMBRE 14-3 1529 2-1 50% 14 IA
17512 Hollywood 13-1 inspire american 1529 6-5 55% 13 OH
17513 CFV 14 1529 11-7 61% 14 WI
17514 Husky 17-New england 1529 26-26 50% 17 CT
17515 Sharks 11 Navy 1529 14-15 48% 11 AL
17516 Krackens 14-2 1529 3-2 60% 14 CA
17517 KMS SAINTS JO 12-Ruf 1529 2-1 40% 12 MN
17518 COAST 16-4 mia b 1529 29-22 57% 16 CA
17519 LevelOne Sherwood 16-1 1529 51-60 46% 16 OR
17520 Vortex 14-Claudia 1529 5-3 56% 14 GA
17521 Adversity 14 Adversity G141 (GL) 1529 11-4 73% 14 IL
17522 Athena 14-Christian 1529 16-13 55% 14 CA
17523 Wave Volleyball Club 12-Rachel 1529 12-15 44% 12 CA
17524 OVA 15-Elite tisha/donald 1529 15-16 48% 15 CA
17525 Roncalli Juniors 10-1 1529 9-11 45% 10 IN
17526 913Athletics 16-White 1529 16-12 57% 16 KS
17527 Lady Lakers 12-S black 1529 4-3 44% 12 ND
17528 HPSTL 12-Gray 1529 20-17 53% 12 MO
17529 South Shore Slam 13 1529 14-9 61% 13 WI
17530 Networks Academy 14-1 1529 30-22 53% 14 AL
17531 CJV 16-Select navy 1529 26-19 58% 16 NC
17532 Stars 15-Kelli 1529 42-29 59% 15 SC
17533 Velocity 15-Red 2 1529 15-11 58% 15 MS
17534 KIAKAHI VBA 16-1 1529 5-5 50% 16 HI
17535 Sky High 15-Vlachos 1529 6-5 55% 15 IL
17536 HPRIME 15-Adidas 1529 20-18 49% 15 TX
17537 Upontop 16-S elite 1529 26-41 39% 16 FL
17538 SVA 13 1529 15-15 50% 13 NV
17539 AVBC 14-A garber/dolce 1529 18-12 60% 14 OH
17540 TAV Houston 13-Royal 1529 12-12 46% 13 TX
17541 M2 Volleyball 16-N2 1529 24-16 60% 16 GA
17542 Mana Toa 15-1 1529 3-2 60% 15 AL
17543 DBQ Insanity CVBC Vollocity 13 1529 3-2 60% 13 IA
17544 575 17-Pcna tina 1529 35-34 51% 17 GA
17545 TX IMPACT 13-Hybrid pink 1529 7-9 44% 13 TX
17546 DVC 13-Gray 1529 5-4 56% 13 OH
17547 DVC 12-Gray 1529 5-4 56% 12 OH
17548 Impact 15-Keyden 1529 18-20 47% 15 MI
17549 Club Fusion 14-Fire spring 1529 7-3 58% 14 IL
17550 Rams Juniors 14-G black 1529 3-2 60% 14 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.