2025-2026 Season — Page 351 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17501 | FVBC 15-Regional red | 1529 | 21-12 | 50% | 15 | MD |
| 17502 | HEAT 11-Heat | 1529 | 9-7 | 56% | 11 | FL |
| 17503 | Foothills 14-Teal | 1529 | 22-20 | 52% | 14 | WA |
| 17504 | Blue Angels 14-Black | 1529 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 17505 | UVA 14-S national | 1529 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | LA |
| 17506 | NRG 15-National navy | 1529 | 23-17 | 56% | 15 | TX |
| 17507 | MN CORE 14-2 | 1529 | 10-10 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 17508 | FVC 16-Wave | 1529 | 27-19 | 57% | 16 | MD |
| 17509 | TX Premier 17-Club | 1529 | 20-12 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 17510 | Club Net 13 Premier | 1529 | 22-26 | 46% | 13 | AR |
| 17511 | IOWA VIBE OMBRE 14-3 | 1529 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 17512 | Hollywood 13-1 inspire american | 1529 | 6-5 | 55% | 13 | OH |
| 17513 | CFV 14 | 1529 | 11-7 | 61% | 14 | WI |
| 17514 | Husky 17-New england | 1529 | 26-26 | 50% | 17 | CT |
| 17515 | Sharks 11 Navy | 1529 | 14-15 | 48% | 11 | AL |
| 17516 | Krackens 14-2 | 1529 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 17517 | KMS SAINTS JO 12-Ruf | 1529 | 2-1 | 40% | 12 | MN |
| 17518 | COAST 16-4 mia b | 1529 | 29-22 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 17519 | LevelOne Sherwood 16-1 | 1529 | 51-60 | 46% | 16 | OR |
| 17520 | Vortex 14-Claudia | 1529 | 5-3 | 56% | 14 | GA |
| 17521 | Adversity 14 Adversity G141 (GL) | 1529 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | IL |
| 17522 | Athena 14-Christian | 1529 | 16-13 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 17523 | Wave Volleyball Club 12-Rachel | 1529 | 12-15 | 44% | 12 | CA |
| 17524 | OVA 15-Elite tisha/donald | 1529 | 15-16 | 48% | 15 | CA |
| 17525 | Roncalli Juniors 10-1 | 1529 | 9-11 | 45% | 10 | IN |
| 17526 | 913Athletics 16-White | 1529 | 16-12 | 57% | 16 | KS |
| 17527 | Lady Lakers 12-S black | 1529 | 4-3 | 44% | 12 | ND |
| 17528 | HPSTL 12-Gray | 1529 | 20-17 | 53% | 12 | MO |
| 17529 | South Shore Slam 13 | 1529 | 14-9 | 61% | 13 | WI |
| 17530 | Networks Academy 14-1 | 1529 | 30-22 | 53% | 14 | AL |
| 17531 | CJV 16-Select navy | 1529 | 26-19 | 58% | 16 | NC |
| 17532 | Stars 15-Kelli | 1529 | 42-29 | 59% | 15 | SC |
| 17533 | Velocity 15-Red 2 | 1529 | 15-11 | 58% | 15 | MS |
| 17534 | KIAKAHI VBA 16-1 | 1529 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | HI |
| 17535 | Sky High 15-Vlachos | 1529 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | IL |
| 17536 | HPRIME 15-Adidas | 1529 | 20-18 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 17537 | Upontop 16-S elite | 1529 | 26-41 | 39% | 16 | FL |
| 17538 | SVA 13 | 1529 | 15-15 | 50% | 13 | NV |
| 17539 | AVBC 14-A garber/dolce | 1529 | 18-12 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 17540 | TAV Houston 13-Royal | 1529 | 12-12 | 46% | 13 | TX |
| 17541 | M2 Volleyball 16-N2 | 1529 | 24-16 | 60% | 16 | GA |
| 17542 | Mana Toa 15-1 | 1529 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | AL |
| 17543 | DBQ Insanity CVBC Vollocity 13 | 1529 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | IA |
| 17544 | 575 17-Pcna tina | 1529 | 35-34 | 51% | 17 | GA |
| 17545 | TX IMPACT 13-Hybrid pink | 1529 | 7-9 | 44% | 13 | TX |
| 17546 | DVC 13-Gray | 1529 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | OH |
| 17547 | DVC 12-Gray | 1529 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | OH |
| 17548 | Impact 15-Keyden | 1529 | 18-20 | 47% | 15 | MI |
| 17549 | Club Fusion 14-Fire spring | 1529 | 7-3 | 58% | 14 | IL |
| 17550 | Rams Juniors 14-G black | 1529 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.