2025-2026 Season — Page 340 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16951 | Summit Volleyball Club G14-1 | 1535 | 7-7 | 47% | 14 | MO |
| 16952 | Vortex 14 | 1535 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | GA |
| 16953 | CTX JR 14-2 | 1535 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 16954 | A5 Gwinnett 17-Jd | 1535 | 32-29 | 52% | 17 | GA |
| 16955 | Moline Jrs 13-White | 1535 | 5-3 | 50% | 13 | IA |
| 16956 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 15-1 | 1535 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | KY |
| 16957 | Synergy 14-Swell | 1535 | 27-24 | 53% | 14 | PA |
| 16958 | CTX Juniors 15-White | 1535 | 18-9 | 62% | 15 | TX |
| 16959 | NNJ 17-Chin | 1535 | 28-25 | 53% | 17 | NV |
| 16960 | BVA - Lions 12-Elite | 1535 | 8-9 | 40% | 12 | IL |
| 16961 | PCVC 15 Kai | 1535 | 21-19 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 16962 | Idaho ONE 11-Blue | 1535 | 13-15 | 46% | 11 | ID |
| 16963 | GVC 14 | 1535 | 2-2 | 40% | 14 | IA |
| 16964 | CINCY EAST 12-2 blue | 1535 | 13-8 | 62% | 12 | OH |
| 16965 | Club Fusion 12-Heat | 1535 | 7-4 | 64% | 12 | IL |
| 16966 | Vibe Volleyball 15-Blue | 1535 | 8-5 | 62% | 15 | FL |
| 16967 | T4 Volleyball 13-G navy | 1535 | 6-5 | 55% | 13 | IL |
| 16968 | Slainte 15-Black | 1535 | 17-22 | 44% | 15 | CA |
| 16969 | BVC 12-White | 1535 | 15-10 | 60% | 12 | WY |
| 16970 | Princeton 17-2 | 1535 | 14-11 | 56% | 17 | NJ |
| 16971 | AVC 14-1 (NO) | 1535 | 16-13 | 55% | 14 | MN |
| 16972 | SPVC 15-2 elite | 1535 | 10-4 | 71% | 15 | LA |
| 16973 | CJ Heat 14-National | 1535 | 9-9 | 50% | 14 | NJ |
| 16974 | Spiketown VBC 13-3 | 1535 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | OH |
| 16975 | PTVBC 13-1 | 1535 | 6-7 | 38% | 13 | IL |
| 16976 | BOA 14-1 | 1535 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | AL |
| 16977 | 3N1 13-Purple | 1535 | 25-13 | 66% | 13 | WA |
| 16978 | NC 12-1 | 1535 | 6-4 | 55% | 12 | ND |
| 16979 | XP 16-Elite 2 | 1535 | 32-20 | 62% | 16 | IL |
| 16980 | All Out VBC 16-Black | 1535 | 10-7 | 59% | 16 | WA |
| 16981 | Advanced Ath 16-2 natl | 1535 | 18-15 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 16982 | Bama Elite 17-N mavericks | 1535 | 27-23 | 54% | 17 | AL |
| 16983 | WIZARD 18 | 1535 | 29-22 | 57% | 18 | FL |
| 16984 | Crystal City Volleyball Club 15 CRYSTAL CITY SAPPHIRES (WE) | 1535 | 8-10 | 36% | 15 | NY |
| 16985 | SA Force 15 National | 1535 | 24-21 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 16986 | CVBC 16-2s | 1535 | 21-14 | 60% | 16 | IN |
| 16987 | BVBC 15 Elena | 1535 | 31-30 | 51% | 15 | CA |
| 16988 | RMVC 15 | 1535 | 32-13 | 65% | 15 | NV |
| 16989 | Allegiance 14-Black | 1535 | 15-11 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 16990 | ASVC 16-N1 | 1535 | 32-21 | 60% | 16 | AZ |
| 16991 | Impact 16-Lys/brian | 1535 | 18-12 | 60% | 16 | MI |
| 16992 | MWP 14 Gold | 1535 | 11-9 | 52% | 14 | MN |
| 16993 | River City Jrs 12-Red | 1535 | 17-11 | 61% | 12 | IA |
| 16994 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-3f | 1535 | 15-13 | 54% | 12 | PR |
| 16995 | Pulse 15-Select | 1535 | 18-12 | 60% | 15 | MI |
| 16996 | Top Tier VC 16-Select | 1535 | 20-24 | 45% | 16 | NJ |
| 16997 | Renaissance 14-Red cran | 1535 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | OH |
| 16998 | KTC 14-Volleyball | 1535 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 16999 | Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 13 13 Thunder | 1535 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | WV |
| 17000 | Azalea 17-Misti | 1535 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.