Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 340 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16951 Summit Volleyball Club G14-1 1535 7-7 47% 14 MO
16952 Vortex 14 1535 2-1 50% 14 GA
16953 CTX JR 14-2 1535 4-4 50% 14 TX
16954 A5 Gwinnett 17-Jd 1535 32-29 52% 17 GA
16955 Moline Jrs 13-White 1535 5-3 50% 13 IA
16956 Elite Volleyball Clubs 15-1 1535 3-2 60% 15 KY
16957 Synergy 14-Swell 1535 27-24 53% 14 PA
16958 CTX Juniors 15-White 1535 18-9 62% 15 TX
16959 NNJ 17-Chin 1535 28-25 53% 17 NV
16960 BVA - Lions 12-Elite 1535 8-9 40% 12 IL
16961 PCVC 15 Kai 1535 21-19 53% 15 CA
16962 Idaho ONE 11-Blue 1535 13-15 46% 11 ID
16963 GVC 14 1535 2-2 40% 14 IA
16964 CINCY EAST 12-2 blue 1535 13-8 62% 12 OH
16965 Club Fusion 12-Heat 1535 7-4 64% 12 IL
16966 Vibe Volleyball 15-Blue 1535 8-5 62% 15 FL
16967 T4 Volleyball 13-G navy 1535 6-5 55% 13 IL
16968 Slainte 15-Black 1535 17-22 44% 15 CA
16969 BVC 12-White 1535 15-10 60% 12 WY
16970 Princeton 17-2 1535 14-11 56% 17 NJ
16971 AVC 14-1 (NO) 1535 16-13 55% 14 MN
16972 SPVC 15-2 elite 1535 10-4 71% 15 LA
16973 CJ Heat 14-National 1535 9-9 50% 14 NJ
16974 Spiketown VBC 13-3 1535 4-2 67% 13 OH
16975 PTVBC 13-1 1535 6-7 38% 13 IL
16976 BOA 14-1 1535 20-16 56% 14 AL
16977 3N1 13-Purple 1535 25-13 66% 13 WA
16978 NC 12-1 1535 6-4 55% 12 ND
16979 XP 16-Elite 2 1535 32-20 62% 16 IL
16980 All Out VBC 16-Black 1535 10-7 59% 16 WA
16981 Advanced Ath 16-2 natl 1535 18-15 53% 16 TX
16982 Bama Elite 17-N mavericks 1535 27-23 54% 17 AL
16983 WIZARD 18 1535 29-22 57% 18 FL
16984 Crystal City Volleyball Club 15 CRYSTAL CITY SAPPHIRES (WE) 1535 8-10 36% 15 NY
16985 SA Force 15 National 1535 24-21 52% 15 TX
16986 CVBC 16-2s 1535 21-14 60% 16 IN
16987 BVBC 15 Elena 1535 31-30 51% 15 CA
16988 RMVC 15 1535 32-13 65% 15 NV
16989 Allegiance 14-Black 1535 15-11 58% 14 TX
16990 ASVC 16-N1 1535 32-21 60% 16 AZ
16991 Impact 16-Lys/brian 1535 18-12 60% 16 MI
16992 MWP 14 Gold 1535 11-9 52% 14 MN
16993 River City Jrs 12-Red 1535 17-11 61% 12 IA
16994 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-3f 1535 15-13 54% 12 PR
16995 Pulse 15-Select 1535 18-12 60% 15 MI
16996 Top Tier VC 16-Select 1535 20-24 45% 16 NJ
16997 Renaissance 14-Red cran 1535 19-13 59% 14 OH
16998 KTC 14-Volleyball 1535 2-1 50% 14 NE
16999 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 13 13 Thunder 1535 5-4 56% 13 WV
17000 Azalea 17-Misti 1535 9-7 56% 17 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.