Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 339 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16901 MCJO 12-S 1536 10-5 67% 12 MN
16902 Southland 10-Black 1536 15-14 47% 10 LA
16903 UPTEMPO 13 Aly 1536 8-5 62% 13 CA
16904 Nova Northeast 12 1536 3-2 60% 12 PA
16905 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 14-Silver 1536 15-11 58% 14 ME
16906 PAVC - NC 13-Emerald 1536 24-14 63% 13 NC
16907 FEVA 15-Local 1536 5-3 63% 15 KY
16908 SVC 13-Orange 1536 4-2 67% 13 MO
16909 Lanier 13-Nat. melinda 1536 17-11 61% 13 GA
16910 Club Selah 14-Blue 1536 10-5 67% 14 WA
16911 SMV 16-4 silver 1536 37-26 59% 16 MN
16912 AVBC 12-R - baker 1536 3-2 60% 12 OH
16913 Santa Ana 16-Joseph 1536 5-2 71% 16 CA
16914 Kali 14-F gabriel 1536 5-5 50% 14 PR
16915 NNJ 17-Chin 1535 28-25 53% 17 NV
16916 A5 Gwinnett 17-Jd 1535 32-29 52% 17 GA
16917 PCVC 15 Kai 1535 21-19 53% 15 CA
16918 CTX JR 14-2 1535 4-4 50% 14 TX
16919 Eclipse 13 Nova 1535 13-7 65% 13 WI
16920 Vortex 14 1535 2-1 50% 14 GA
16921 OFVA 12-S 1535 5-4 56% 12 OH
16922 BOA 14-1 1535 20-16 56% 14 AL
16923 Sanford Sports 14-Grey 1535 20-19 51% 14 SD
16924 PJVBC 11-National 1535 25-19 57% 11 WA
16925 Princeton 17-2 1535 14-11 56% 17 NJ
16926 IMUA 14-Kiersten 1535 20-15 57% 14 CA
16927 NC 12-1 1535 6-4 55% 12 ND
16928 LHVA 12-Purple travel 1535 15-11 58% 12 NY
16929 Renaissance 14-Red cran 1535 19-13 59% 14 OH
16930 Next Gen 14-Black 1535 27-16 60% 14 MO
16931 NE Elite 18-Miami 1535 8-6 57% 18 NE
16932 CTX Juniors 15 Silver 1535 23-13 64% 15 TX
16933 MN Select 15-Gray 1535 36-34 51% 15 MN
16934 PRVA 13 Surf 1535 3-2 60% 13 CA
16935 COLAVOL 18-Black 1535 24-14 63% 18 GA
16936 Kavod Volleyball Club 13-1 1535 19-10 66% 13 NC
16937 Warsaw 10-Purple 1535 2-1 67% 10 IN
16938 MVA 13-White-hub 1535 29-16 64% 13 FL
16939 Syndicate 14-Steven 1535 16-8 67% 14 CA
16940 Champions 17-Short 1535 6-3 60% 17 AL
16941 Point Break VBC 15 Santos 1535 22-13 63% 15 CA
16942 HBJ 15-Clarksville 1535 12-4 75% 15 AR
16943 Delta Juniors 14 1535 3-1 75% 14 CO
16944 Crosshill Christian 16 1535 14-6 70% 16 OR
16945 RAGE 14-Ben 1535 26-17 60% 14 CA
16946 Bama Elite 17-N mavericks 1535 27-23 54% 17 AL
16947 Next Level 10-1 sheila 1535 10-5 67% 10 PR
16948 Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mccripsy 1535 4-2 67% 16 WA
16949 Moline Jrs 13-White 1535 5-3 50% 13 IA
16950 East TX Jrs 16-B 1535 15-9 54% 16
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.