2025-2026 Season — Page 339 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16901 | MCJO 12-S | 1536 | 10-5 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 16902 | Southland 10-Black | 1536 | 15-14 | 47% | 10 | LA |
| 16903 | UPTEMPO 13 Aly | 1536 | 8-5 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 16904 | Nova Northeast 12 | 1536 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | PA |
| 16905 | Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 14-Silver | 1536 | 15-11 | 58% | 14 | ME |
| 16906 | PAVC - NC 13-Emerald | 1536 | 24-14 | 63% | 13 | NC |
| 16907 | FEVA 15-Local | 1536 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | KY |
| 16908 | SVC 13-Orange | 1536 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | MO |
| 16909 | Lanier 13-Nat. melinda | 1536 | 17-11 | 61% | 13 | GA |
| 16910 | Club Selah 14-Blue | 1536 | 10-5 | 67% | 14 | WA |
| 16911 | SMV 16-4 silver | 1536 | 37-26 | 59% | 16 | MN |
| 16912 | AVBC 12-R - baker | 1536 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | OH |
| 16913 | Santa Ana 16-Joseph | 1536 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | CA |
| 16914 | Kali 14-F gabriel | 1536 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | PR |
| 16915 | NNJ 17-Chin | 1535 | 28-25 | 53% | 17 | NV |
| 16916 | A5 Gwinnett 17-Jd | 1535 | 32-29 | 52% | 17 | GA |
| 16917 | PCVC 15 Kai | 1535 | 21-19 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 16918 | CTX JR 14-2 | 1535 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 16919 | Eclipse 13 Nova | 1535 | 13-7 | 65% | 13 | WI |
| 16920 | Vortex 14 | 1535 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | GA |
| 16921 | OFVA 12-S | 1535 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | OH |
| 16922 | BOA 14-1 | 1535 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | AL |
| 16923 | Sanford Sports 14-Grey | 1535 | 20-19 | 51% | 14 | SD |
| 16924 | PJVBC 11-National | 1535 | 25-19 | 57% | 11 | WA |
| 16925 | Princeton 17-2 | 1535 | 14-11 | 56% | 17 | NJ |
| 16926 | IMUA 14-Kiersten | 1535 | 20-15 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 16927 | NC 12-1 | 1535 | 6-4 | 55% | 12 | ND |
| 16928 | LHVA 12-Purple travel | 1535 | 15-11 | 58% | 12 | NY |
| 16929 | Renaissance 14-Red cran | 1535 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | OH |
| 16930 | Next Gen 14-Black | 1535 | 27-16 | 60% | 14 | MO |
| 16931 | NE Elite 18-Miami | 1535 | 8-6 | 57% | 18 | NE |
| 16932 | CTX Juniors 15 Silver | 1535 | 23-13 | 64% | 15 | TX |
| 16933 | MN Select 15-Gray | 1535 | 36-34 | 51% | 15 | MN |
| 16934 | PRVA 13 Surf | 1535 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | CA |
| 16935 | COLAVOL 18-Black | 1535 | 24-14 | 63% | 18 | GA |
| 16936 | Kavod Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1535 | 19-10 | 66% | 13 | NC |
| 16937 | Warsaw 10-Purple | 1535 | 2-1 | 67% | 10 | IN |
| 16938 | MVA 13-White-hub | 1535 | 29-16 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 16939 | Syndicate 14-Steven | 1535 | 16-8 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 16940 | Champions 17-Short | 1535 | 6-3 | 60% | 17 | AL |
| 16941 | Point Break VBC 15 Santos | 1535 | 22-13 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 16942 | HBJ 15-Clarksville | 1535 | 12-4 | 75% | 15 | AR |
| 16943 | Delta Juniors 14 | 1535 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | CO |
| 16944 | Crosshill Christian 16 | 1535 | 14-6 | 70% | 16 | OR |
| 16945 | RAGE 14-Ben | 1535 | 26-17 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 16946 | Bama Elite 17-N mavericks | 1535 | 27-23 | 54% | 17 | AL |
| 16947 | Next Level 10-1 sheila | 1535 | 10-5 | 67% | 10 | PR |
| 16948 | Absolute Zero BVC 16-Mccripsy | 1535 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | WA |
| 16949 | Moline Jrs 13-White | 1535 | 5-3 | 50% | 13 | IA |
| 16950 | East TX Jrs 16-B | 1535 | 15-9 | 54% | 16 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.