Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 338 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16851 Tehachapi Starlings 16-S 1536 15-6 71% 16 CA
16852 MJVA 14-Elite gold 1536 21-19 53% 14 TN
16853 WC 14-White 1536 4-2 57% 14 GA
16854 Santa Ana 16-Joseph 1536 5-2 71% 16 CA
16855 HOU STELLAR 15-Select 1536 16-11 59% 15 TX
16856 BCO 16-1 1536 2-6 25% 16 BC
16857 FE 15-Maroon 1536 3-1 75% 15
16858 Club Integrity 12-2 1536 5-4 56% 12 PA
16859 Cincy Crush 12-2 1536 18-13 58% 12 OH
16860 MILTON EDGE 17 Milton Edge Platinum 1536 8-4 67% 17
16861 ACA 14-Black 1536 13-9 57% 14 KS
16862 Venom Prime 16-Girls 1536 2-5 29% 16 FL
16863 OVA 16-G legacy 1536 11-41 21% 16 AZ
16864 TEV 15-Lora/april 1536 22-12 65% 15 TN
16865 ITVC 16-1 1536 2-6 25% 16 WA
16866 AVA 14-Vipers 1536 14-10 58% 14 MA
16867 Club V 14-Prodigy shauna 1536 2-9 18% 14 UT
16868 Cut Shot VBC 13-1 damon 1536 3-4 43% 13 CA
16869 Airdrie Hawks 15-Girls blue 1536 4-5 44% 15 HI
16870 Madfrog 13-N white 1536 24-33 39% 13 TX
16871 MOJO Elite Volleyball 14-Black 1536 24-21 52% 14 VA
16872 MVIce 16-P natalie 1536 5-8 33% 16 ID
16873 HEAT 15-National boo 1536 27-27 50% 15 CA
16874 Xcel 13-Elite blue 1536 25-17 60% 13 NC
16875 SVC 13 National 1536 2-4 33% 13 CA
16876 Milwaukee Jr's 14-Silver 1536 23-11 68% 14 WI
16877 Amboy 14 1536 2-1 50% 14 IA
16878 Firecrackers 14-Red 1536 27-17 61% 14 NC
16879 ESVBC 16-Blizzard 1536 23-18 56% 16 IA
16880 Rocky Elite 16-Black 1536 24-19 56% 16 CO
16881 HHVBC 17-1g 1536 6-5 55% 17 IA
16882 SC Rockstar 13-Hadassah 1536 25-29 46% 13 CA
16883 High Desert Elite 14-Elite 1536 27-29 48% 14 CO
16884 MVI 12-Jayne 1536 2-1 50% 12 ID
16885 WBVBC 13-1 nikki 1536 20-21 49% 13 OH
16886 Surfside 14-Mb legends 1536 16-22 42% 14 CA
16887 Quickset 12-Blue 1536 19-10 66% 12 PA
16888 L2 Volleyball Club 16 L2 261 1536 23-16 59% 16 MI
16889 LES 18 McKenna 1536 11-8 52% 18 AL
16890 Kokoro Volleyball 12-1 1536 31-30 51% 12 MN
16891 CVC 17 SILVER 1536 25-27 48% 17 OH
16892 Kali 14-F gabriel 1536 5-5 50% 14 PR
16893 Hoosier Elite Huskies 12-1 1536 22-27 45% 12 IN
16894 FAVA 14 1536 3-1 50% 14 PA
16895 Impulse 11-Red 1536 8-7 53% 11 IN
16896 FB Xpress 12-Black 1536 14-7 52% 12 TX
16897 Impact 14-Red lacy 1536 8-11 42% 14 NV
16898 Elevate 16-Sneaky sloths 1536 40-25 62% 16 WI
16899 PSVBA 16-Elite red 1536 19-18 51% 16 WA
16900 St. Pete 16-Black 1536 30-25 55% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.