Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 337 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16801 1United 12-Regional 1537 14-10 48% 12 TX
16802 CCVA 17-Elite 1537 11-10 52% 17 CA
16803 314 VBC 17-Navy 1537 33-20 61% 17 MO
16804 LCJOVB 14-Black 1537 13-9 59% 14 MN
16805 Banzai VBC 15-Select 1537 7-13 35% 15 NE
16806 ONE Volleyball 17 1537 16-12 57% 17 GA
16807 AVC CLE 12-Maroon 1537 8-7 53% 12 OH
16808 Val Verde Victory 13-2 volt 1537 8-4 62% 13 TX
16809 BR- 231 Slide 16-James 1537 21-12 64% 16 MI
16810 Wranglers VBC 16-Heather 1537 9-10 47% 16 MI
16811 Carolina Vibe 14-Ashley 1537 11-7 61% 14 NC
16812 FB Xpress 14 Elite 1537 24-23 49% 14 TX
16813 Northeast 17-Orange 1537 23-14 62% 17 CT
16814 SG Elite 15 Lightning 1537 15-12 56% 15 CA
16815 MMVC 18-Gold 1537 20-19 51% 18 WV
16816 Dynamites Lady Red 18-1 1537 28-21 57% 18 AZ
16817 808 Athletic Club 18-Albert 1537 14-12 54% 18 HI
16818 Eclipse Volleyball Club 15 EVC Ervin (OV) 1537 20-13 61% 15
16819 FWFIRE 15-1w 1537 13-8 52% 15 TX
16820 Vision 13 Tom 1537 6-3 67% 13 GA
16821 Rising Tide Volleyball 17 Rising Tide Sandstormers 1537 31-36 46% 17 SC
16822 BSVBC 14-Gray 1537 17-18 44% 14 IL
16823 FC Elite 14-Ex 1537 12-6 67% 14 WI
16824 Freedom G16-1 1537 4-1 67% 16 MO
16825 UVC 12-Alyssa 1537 4-2 67% 12 IL
16826 SPARKS VBC 14-Navy 1537 28-22 56% 14 PA
16827 Ft Wayne VBC 13-Select black 1537 16-13 55% 13 IN
16828 NKJV 14-White 1537 20-12 63% 14 KY
16829 PROJECT SPIKERS 14-2 1537 21-9 57% 14
16830 ESVBC 16-Lightning natl 1537 28-17 62% 16 IA
16831 Sky High 15-Miller 1537 8-3 73% 15 IL
16832 HC FLOW 11-Pipeline 1536 22-13 59% 11 TX
16833 Cowlitz 14-1 black 1536 16-19 43% 14 OR
16834 OVA 16-G legacy 1536 11-41 21% 16 AZ
16835 Club V 14-Prodigy shauna 1536 2-9 18% 14 UT
16836 High Desert Elite 14-Elite 1536 27-29 48% 14 CO
16837 Hoosier Elite Huskies 12-1 1536 22-27 45% 12 IN
16838 MVI 12-Jayne 1536 2-1 50% 12 ID
16839 WBVBC 13-1 nikki 1536 20-21 49% 13 OH
16840 Cut Shot VBC 13-1 damon 1536 3-4 43% 13 CA
16841 JNVBC 14-E black 1536 12-13 44% 14 IA
16842 Kokoro Volleyball 12-1 1536 31-30 51% 12 MN
16843 LES 18 McKenna 1536 11-8 52% 18 AL
16844 Impulse 11-Red 1536 8-7 53% 11 IN
16845 FB Xpress 12-Black 1536 14-7 52% 12 TX
16846 Madfrog 13-N white 1536 24-33 39% 13 TX
16847 Kali 14-F gabriel 1536 5-5 50% 14 PR
16848 OVVC 17-Green 1536 24-17 59% 17 OH
16849 ATHENA VB 15-4 black select 1536 24-29 45% 15 OR
16850 MJVA 14-Elite gold 1536 21-19 53% 14 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.