2025-2026 Season — Page 336 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16751 | Nebraska ONE 17-Lime | 1537 | 16-24 | 40% | 17 | NE |
| 16752 | Santa Fe Storm 15-4 derrick | 1537 | 3-3 | 38% | 15 | CO |
| 16753 | NE Net Ninjas 12 | 1537 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | |
| 16754 | Indianola IVC 13-Elite | 1537 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | IA |
| 16755 | 3D 13 | 1537 | 3-2 | 43% | 13 | IA |
| 16756 | Fresno Heat HEAT 16-National ryan | 1537 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | NV |
| 16757 | BSVBC 13-White | 1537 | 15-14 | 48% | 13 | IL |
| 16758 | Radiate 13-Black | 1537 | 6-5 | 46% | 13 | UT |
| 16759 | Summit Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1537 | 5-5 | 42% | 16 | MO |
| 16760 | BC Rise 10 Adidas | 1537 | 7-8 | 37% | 10 | TX |
| 16761 | Cap City 13-Select diamonds | 1537 | 18-18 | 45% | 13 | MT |
| 16762 | Alexandria Titans 15-1 | 1537 | 12-10 | 55% | 15 | VA |
| 16763 | Austin County 10-Red | 1537 | 6-3 | 55% | 10 | TX |
| 16764 | ONE Volleyball 17 | 1537 | 16-12 | 57% | 17 | GA |
| 16765 | SOUTH SHORE 16-RED | 1537 | 23-18 | 56% | 16 | TX |
| 16766 | AVC CLE 12-Maroon | 1537 | 8-7 | 53% | 12 | OH |
| 16767 | FWFIRE 15-1w | 1537 | 13-8 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 16768 | Miami Bombers 13-State | 1537 | 8-4 | 67% | 13 | FL |
| 16769 | SVC 13-White | 1537 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 16770 | 314 VBC 17-Navy | 1537 | 33-20 | 61% | 17 | MO |
| 16771 | Carolina Vibe 14-Ashley | 1537 | 11-7 | 61% | 14 | NC |
| 16772 | Val Verde Victory 13-2 volt | 1537 | 8-4 | 62% | 13 | TX |
| 16773 | North Iowa Blaze 16 | 1537 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | IA |
| 16774 | LCJOVB 14-Black | 1537 | 13-9 | 59% | 14 | MN |
| 16775 | 575 14-Wse bia | 1537 | 32-43 | 43% | 14 | GA |
| 16776 | FC Elite 14-Ex | 1537 | 12-6 | 67% | 14 | WI |
| 16777 | NKJV 14-White | 1537 | 20-12 | 63% | 14 | KY |
| 16778 | ESVBC 16-Lightning natl | 1537 | 28-17 | 62% | 16 | IA |
| 16779 | Philly Starlings 14 | 1537 | 3-1 | 60% | 14 | PA |
| 16780 | UVC 12-Alyssa | 1537 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | IL |
| 16781 | SIX8FOUR 14-Girls - american samoa | 1537 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | HI |
| 16782 | Blaine Juniors 16-1 | 1537 | 15-6 | 71% | 16 | MN |
| 16783 | Freedom G16-1 | 1537 | 4-1 | 67% | 16 | MO |
| 16784 | Northeast 17-Orange | 1537 | 23-14 | 62% | 17 | CT |
| 16785 | Velocity 219 14-1 | 1537 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | IN |
| 16786 | Elkhorn Volleyball Club 14 14 Purple | 1537 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | WI |
| 16787 | BHJ NH 16-1 | 1537 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | SD |
| 16788 | RISE 14-Local black | 1537 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 16789 | Team Mascoutah 13-1 | 1537 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | MO |
| 16790 | P3R 12-West end | 1537 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | PA |
| 16791 | Low Country 16-National | 1537 | 23-32 | 42% | 16 | SC |
| 16792 | Windom Zeds 14-1 reisdorfer | 1537 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | SD |
| 16793 | TAV 14-Red | 1537 | 31-15 | 67% | 14 | IL |
| 16794 | MiElite 14-Topaz west | 1537 | 19-7 | 73% | 14 | MI |
| 16795 | Momentum 13-1 | 1537 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | IN |
| 16796 | Rise 16-2 (MN) | 1537 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | MN |
| 16797 | Panhandle Boomers 14-1 | 1537 | 22-13 | 63% | 14 | WV |
| 16798 | Ultimate G14 Silver | 1537 | 26-8 | 76% | 14 | IL |
| 16799 | SEVA 16 Crimson | 1537 | 34-34 | 49% | 16 | TN |
| 16800 | St. Pete 14-Black | 1537 | 39-21 | 65% | 14 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.