2025-2026 Season — Page 341 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17001 | River City Jrs 12-Red | 1535 | 17-11 | 61% | 12 | IA |
| 17002 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-3f | 1535 | 15-13 | 54% | 12 | PR |
| 17003 | Pulse 15-Select | 1535 | 18-12 | 60% | 15 | MI |
| 17004 | Top Tier VC 16-Select | 1535 | 20-24 | 45% | 16 | NJ |
| 17005 | KTC 14-Volleyball | 1535 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 17006 | Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 13 13 Thunder | 1535 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | WV |
| 17007 | Azalea 17-Misti | 1535 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | FL |
| 17008 | VSTX 12-Dean | 1535 | 9-6 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 17009 | Club Gold 18-Blue | 1535 | 18-24 | 43% | 18 | WA |
| 17010 | Custer Wild 18 | 1535 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | SD |
| 17011 | Renaissance 14-Red cran | 1535 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | OH |
| 17012 | Focus 14-Lucas | 1534 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | |
| 17013 | Club One AZ 13-Royal | 1534 | 21-15 | 58% | 13 | AZ |
| 17014 | Lancers 12-Uscarlet | 1534 | 2-1 | 50% | 12 | IA |
| 17015 | HDVC 15-Maddie | 1534 | 17-13 | 57% | 15 | TN |
| 17016 | CINCY EAST 11-1 black | 1534 | 14-11 | 56% | 11 | OH |
| 17017 | Boise Ignite 17-Natl | 1534 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | ID |
| 17018 | IGNITE 11-Black | 1534 | 10-8 | 56% | 11 | OH |
| 17019 | A3 13 ATHENA | 1534 | 18-14 | 56% | 13 | TN |
| 17020 | NC 14-1 | 1534 | 4-2 | 57% | 14 | ND |
| 17021 | Colorado Elite 16-Kodiak | 1534 | 30-25 | 55% | 16 | CO |
| 17022 | MAVS KC Select 14-1 | 1534 | 11-3 | 65% | 14 | KS |
| 17023 | FaR Out 13-White | 1534 | 27-14 | 66% | 13 | MI |
| 17024 | Coastal VBC 16-Grey | 1534 | 20-9 | 65% | 16 | DE |
| 17025 | VC United 16-3 premier | 1534 | 10-6 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 17026 | Trailblazers 12-Vipers | 1534 | 13-8 | 62% | 12 | IN |
| 17027 | Bluff VBC 18-1 | 1534 | 8-5 | 62% | 18 | IA |
| 17028 | Emerald Rain 16 Select | 1534 | 43-30 | 59% | 16 | WA |
| 17029 | Wolfpack 17-S | 1534 | 11-5 | 69% | 17 | IN |
| 17030 | MRVC1 16-1 | 1534 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 17031 | Kids America 15-Albertson | 1534 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 17032 | Six Pack Legit 17-G malea | 1534 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | IA |
| 17033 | Xcel 18-Russell | 1534 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | AL |
| 17034 | Fission 12-Regional 1 | 1534 | 17-8 | 68% | 12 | GA |
| 17035 | UPONTOP 12-Local | 1534 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | FL |
| 17036 | Warsaw 13-Purple | 1534 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | IN |
| 17037 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 18-3 | 1534 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | KS |
| 17038 | MidShore Volleyball 16 16U MidShore Motivate (CH) | 1534 | 15-13 | 45% | 16 | |
| 17039 | Yuba Elite VBC 16-Blue | 1534 | 17-10 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 17040 | COLA 16-Gray | 1534 | 15-12 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 17041 | Iowa Storm 18-S | 1534 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | IA |
| 17042 | Blue Water Wave 15-1 | 1534 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | MI |
| 17043 | CT Juniors 16-Premier | 1534 | 15-12 | 56% | 16 | CT |
| 17044 | Pakmen 15-Black | 1534 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | ON |
| 17045 | Monon 12-1mi jaguars | 1534 | 14-12 | 54% | 12 | IN |
| 17046 | 417 Juniors 17-3 | 1534 | 3-1 | 60% | 17 | MO |
| 17047 | CCVB 17-1 | 1534 | 1-4 | 20% | 17 | GA |
| 17048 | Freedom 14-2 | 1534 | 6-7 | 38% | 14 | MO |
| 17049 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-F guille | 1534 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | PR |
| 17050 | GSVC 14-Silver | 1534 | 15-10 | 58% | 14 | NH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.