Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 341 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17001 River City Jrs 12-Red 1535 17-11 61% 12 IA
17002 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-3f 1535 15-13 54% 12 PR
17003 Pulse 15-Select 1535 18-12 60% 15 MI
17004 Top Tier VC 16-Select 1535 20-24 45% 16 NJ
17005 KTC 14-Volleyball 1535 2-1 50% 14 NE
17006 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 13 13 Thunder 1535 5-4 56% 13 WV
17007 Azalea 17-Misti 1535 9-7 56% 17 FL
17008 VSTX 12-Dean 1535 9-6 53% 12 TX
17009 Club Gold 18-Blue 1535 18-24 43% 18 WA
17010 Custer Wild 18 1535 3-7 30% 18 SD
17011 Renaissance 14-Red cran 1535 19-13 59% 14 OH
17012 Focus 14-Lucas 1534 2-3 40% 14
17013 Club One AZ 13-Royal 1534 21-15 58% 13 AZ
17014 Lancers 12-Uscarlet 1534 2-1 50% 12 IA
17015 HDVC 15-Maddie 1534 17-13 57% 15 TN
17016 CINCY EAST 11-1 black 1534 14-11 56% 11 OH
17017 Boise Ignite 17-Natl 1534 4-3 57% 17 ID
17018 IGNITE 11-Black 1534 10-8 56% 11 OH
17019 A3 13 ATHENA 1534 18-14 56% 13 TN
17020 NC 14-1 1534 4-2 57% 14 ND
17021 Colorado Elite 16-Kodiak 1534 30-25 55% 16 CO
17022 MAVS KC Select 14-1 1534 11-3 65% 14 KS
17023 FaR Out 13-White 1534 27-14 66% 13 MI
17024 Coastal VBC 16-Grey 1534 20-9 65% 16 DE
17025 VC United 16-3 premier 1534 10-6 63% 16 IL
17026 Trailblazers 12-Vipers 1534 13-8 62% 12 IN
17027 Bluff VBC 18-1 1534 8-5 62% 18 IA
17028 Emerald Rain 16 Select 1534 43-30 59% 16 WA
17029 Wolfpack 17-S 1534 11-5 69% 17 IN
17030 MRVC1 16-1 1534 6-3 67% 16 OH
17031 Kids America 15-Albertson 1534 6-3 67% 15 OH
17032 Six Pack Legit 17-G malea 1534 3-2 60% 17 IA
17033 Xcel 18-Russell 1534 5-3 63% 18 AL
17034 Fission 12-Regional 1 1534 17-8 68% 12 GA
17035 UPONTOP 12-Local 1534 5-3 63% 12 FL
17036 Warsaw 13-Purple 1534 3-1 75% 13 IN
17037 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 18-3 1534 5-2 71% 18 KS
17038 MidShore Volleyball 16 16U MidShore Motivate (CH) 1534 15-13 45% 16
17039 Yuba Elite VBC 16-Blue 1534 17-10 63% 16 CA
17040 COLA 16-Gray 1534 15-12 56% 16 CA
17041 Iowa Storm 18-S 1534 3-2 60% 18 IA
17042 Blue Water Wave 15-1 1534 8-2 80% 15 MI
17043 CT Juniors 16-Premier 1534 15-12 56% 16 CT
17044 Pakmen 15-Black 1534 2-3 40% 15 ON
17045 Monon 12-1mi jaguars 1534 14-12 54% 12 IN
17046 417 Juniors 17-3 1534 3-1 60% 17 MO
17047 CCVB 17-1 1534 1-4 20% 17 GA
17048 Freedom 14-2 1534 6-7 38% 14 MO
17049 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-F guille 1534 2-5 29% 16 PR
17050 GSVC 14-Silver 1534 15-10 58% 14 NH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.