Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 342 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
17051 Miami Hype 15-Power2 1534 49-31 61% 15 FL
17052 P3R 15-Birmingham 1534 4-1 80% 15 PA
17053 360 Volleyball Club 16 16.1 1534 3-4 43% 16 TX
17054 NC 14-1 1534 4-2 57% 14 ND
17055 HDVC 15-Maddie 1534 17-13 57% 15 TN
17056 Six Pack Legit 17-G malea 1534 3-2 60% 17 IA
17057 KVA 14-Hunny 1534 8-7 53% 14 HI
17058 CMVBC 13 1534 4-4 50% 13 NE
17059 Boise Ignite 17-Natl 1534 4-3 57% 17 ID
17060 NE Velocity 13-3 1534 14-7 67% 13 MN
17061 Ballistix 15-25 1534 7-7 50% 15 OH
17062 Monon 12-1mi jaguars 1534 14-12 54% 12 IN
17063 DVVC 14-1 1534 3-4 43% 14 NV
17064 PEVC 17-N vicki 1534 18-17 51% 17 AL
17065 Aftershock 15-Black 1534 21-21 50% 15 CA
17066 Alliance 14-Reg black 1534 4-1 80% 14 TN
17067 Saratoga 17-Select 1534 29-14 62% 17 NY
17068 Trailblazers 12-Vipers 1534 13-8 62% 12 IN
17069 UP North Jr's MQT 16-Grey 1534 8-3 73% 16 WI
17070 Mindset Premier 11-Red 1534 16-11 57% 11 IL
17071 MAVS KC Select 14-1 1534 11-3 65% 14 KS
17072 Monon 13-1mi flyers 1534 13-12 52% 13 IN
17073 Southern Swing 15-BLACK 1534 11-8 55% 15 TX
17074 Boston United 15-Onyx 1534 17-8 68% 15 MA
17075 Cache Valley Volleyball Club 17-1 1534 4-8 33% 17 UT
17076 COASTLINE 14-BLACK 1534 27-15 64% 14 NC
17077 Xcel 18-Russell 1534 5-3 63% 18 AL
17078 Coastal VBC 16-Grey 1534 20-9 65% 16 DE
17079 Evolution 13 Elite 1534 14-13 52% 13 IA
17080 VC United 16-3 premier 1534 10-6 63% 16 IL
17081 Sporting Albany Girls 16 1534 17-21 45% 16 NY
17082 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-T savannah 1534 10-12 45% 16 NJ
17083 Club GSL 18-Elect - kendra 1534 27-30 47% 18 UT
17084 Illini NW 12-Peach 1534 3-3 38% 12 IL
17085 Venom 16-Black 1534 11-6 65% 16 MN
17086 RUSH Y 17-Black 1534 16-15 52% 17 AZ
17087 KW Revolution 18 Elite 1534 23-19 55% 18 TX
17088 Club 217 14-Kate 1534 12-9 57% 14 IL
17089 Wildfire 13-Denise 1534 20-15 57% 13 FL
17090 FVA 14-Blaze - a 1534 12-13 43% 14 AK
17091 Sahuarita Starfires 14-Fire 1534 21-8 72% 14 AZ
17092 Michio Chicago 14-Premier 1534 18-18 50% 14 IL
17093 Bluff VBC 18-1 1534 8-5 62% 18 IA
17094 Fremont Flames 13 1534 3-1 75% 13 CO
17095 Onyx Volleyball Club 16-Diamond 1534 17-9 65% 16 CA
17096 Effingham Elite Volleyball Club LLC 12-L 1534 4-1 50% 12 GA
17097 Grandlake 14-Thaden 1534 2-2 50% 14 OH
17098 MOJO Volleyball Academy 14-1 1534 14-14 47% 14 KS
17099 MIDTN Volleyball 12-Blue 1534 24-16 59% 12 TN
17100 SEVC 11-1 1534 7-5 58% 11 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.