Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 272 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13551 All Set 13 Tima 1573 6-12 33% 13 AK
13552 ZTV 16-2 platinum 1573 15-16 45% 16 MT
13553 CVC 10-Blue 1573 6-5 55% 10 OH
13554 DNVB 14-White 1573 8-8 50% 14 TX
13555 GSL JO VB 13-1 1573 3-1 60% 13 MN
13556 Coast Volleyball Club 13-3 hannah 1573 27-19 59% 13 CA
13557 KVBC 12-1s 1573 20-14 59% 12 MN
13558 Hub City 13u 1573 22-18 52% 13 MD
13559 RVC 13 State 1573 35-19 65% 13 VA
13560 TNT 14-Impact 1573 10-6 59% 14 MA
13561 Lunar NYC 15 Lunar NYC 1573 10-15 40% 15 NY
13562 GW.Wentzville Heat 16-1 navy 1573 4-3 36% 16 MO
13563 Va Wave 15 Tidal 1573 28-15 65% 15 VA
13564 Aspire NW 16-3 beaverton 1573 28-11 72% 16 OR
13565 RVBC 15U Blue 1573 20-11 65% 15 PA
13566 Mana Toa 14-Audrey 1573 15-11 58% 14 AL
13567 Elite Alliance 14-2 1573 7-4 64% 14 SD
13568 Forza 14-BLK 1573 43-28 59% 14 IL
13569 Texas Fury 17-Unite 1573 30-16 65% 17 TX
13570 913Athletics 14-Black 1573 18-20 47% 14 KS
13571 Panther Girls 16-Red 1573 21-15 58% 16 CO
13572 Prime Performance 14-Festival 1573 5-5 50% 14 AZ
13573 Jaguars 12-Black 1573 19-11 54% 12 NY
13574 Lockdown VBC 13-Sparrows 1573 25-24 51% 13 MA
13575 BVA 13-Elite 1573 19-11 63% 13 NC
13576 Club Neo 14 NEO 14'S 1573 11-7 58% 14 OK
13577 Bandits VBA 13-1 1573 26-14 65% 13 AZ
13578 USANY Patience 18-2 1573 16-33 33% 18 NY
13579 Academy 18-E fury 1573 19-33 37% 18 IN
13580 PV 15-Sean 1573 5-1 83% 15 MA
13581 DN 16-Black 1573 6-17 21% 16 TX
13582 ESVBC 15-Fire national 1573 33-29 53% 15 IA
13583 UNITED 16-Farhad 1573 12-7 63% 16 CA
13584 Crossfire 16-2 1573 36-36 50% 16 MN
13585 WVC 17-Royal 1573 25-19 57% 17 SC
13586 MN Attack 15-1 1573 15-12 56% 15 MN
13587 Venetian Bay Auburn 15-1 guava 1573 19-12 61% 15 AL
13588 CTX Royalty 12-S 1573 14-8 54% 12 TX
13589 Avalanche 14 Amanda 1573 32-31 51% 14 AZ
13590 Monon 16-3r fates 1573 31-16 66% 16 IN
13591 North Shore Raiders 14-1 1573 5-2 71% 14 HI
13592 LIV 15-Grey viktoria 1573 18-19 49% 15 CA
13593 MEVC 14 American 1573 33-22 56% 14 MD
13594 Kokoro Volleyball 16-2 1573 30-39 43% 16 MN
13595 BORINQUEN COQUI 17-F gerry 1573 6-2 75% 17 PR
13596 Thundercats Volleyball 14 Thundercats Eclipse (CA) 1573 7-1 88% 14
13597 Windthorst Vernon 11 1573 4-3 57% 11
13598 Texas United 14-Silver 1573 15-8 63% 14 TX
13599 MVA 14-Isa 1573 32-36 47% 14 FL
13600 City 11-Gold 1572 21-21 50% 11 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.