Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 271 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13501 GI Vikes 13-Black 1574 4-1 67% 13 NE
13502 Cypress Huskies 12 1574 16-12 55% 12 TX
13503 Big Sky 12-Westside 1574 18-20 42% 12 MT
13504 Skyline 14-Silver stephen 1574 24-16 52% 14 TX
13505 Vibe 15-Ed 1574 19-26 42% 15 CA
13506 S-MAQ 12-1 white 1574 12-5 71% 12 OH
13507 Nebraska ONE 16-Black 1574 28-23 55% 16 NE
13508 LES 16-Jason 1574 14-7 67% 16 AL
13509 Idaho Strike 14-Black 1574 10-9 53% 14 ID
13510 Monon 12-4r ocelots 1574 27-17 61% 12 IN
13511 LevelOne Sherwood 17-1 1574 28-23 55% 17 OR
13512 Future Lady Comets 12-1 1574 8-4 67% 12 IA
13513 SVC 16-U threshers 1574 25-17 60% 16 SC
13514 Anthem United 11-Agape 1574 8-2 73% 11 GA
13515 FVVC 16-1 1574 7-5 58% 16 BC
13516 Tulsa Powser 12-1 1574 1-0 100% 12
13517 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 14-Girls black 1574 5-2 71% 14
13518 Cougars Volleyball Club 16 16U Cougars 1574 6-4 60% 16
13519 VIPER 14 National 1574 26-24 52% 14 TN
13520 NE Top Flight 14-Gold 1574 3-1 50% 14 NE
13521 Top Select 14-Top yellow 1573 46-30 61% 14 FL
13522 PEAK 11-3 1573 24-9 71% 11 OK
13523 Northern Revival 16 1573 48-47 51% 16 MN
13524 WVBA 13-Elite black 1573 35-24 59% 13 FL
13525 Mililani 13-S 1573 18-12 60% 13 HI
13526 Elevate 12 Asia 1573 17-9 65% 12 SC
13527 Black Hills Juniors 14-Gold 1573 5-5 45% 14 WY
13528 1United 14-N silver 1573 23-21 51% 14 TX
13529 Starlings AV 15 Navy 1573 16-5 76% 15 CA
13530 UVA 13-S national black 1573 3-2 60% 13 LA
13531 River City Jrs 14-Red 1573 29-20 59% 14 IA
13532 TPV 15-Maverick 1573 19-39 33% 15 TN
13533 Top Flight 16-Gamma 1573 5-0 100% 16 IL
13534 Next Level 18-1 aneudi 1573 3-8 27% 18 PR
13535 Nestor Starlings 14-Luis 1573 40-22 65% 14 CA
13536 Red Storm 13 Elite 1573 22-17 56% 13 LA
13537 Roots 12-2 blue 1573 23-12 66% 12 TX
13538 IconVBC 12-Adidas 1573 24-18 57% 12 CA
13539 Jordan 13-1 1573 8-5 62% 13 MN
13540 PerfElite 16-1 1573 38-20 66% 16 NY
13541 DIablos 13 1573 29-18 62% 13 AZ
13542 Hibbing 12-Black 1573 5-3 63% 12 MN
13543 Momentum Volleyball 15-Genna 1573 22-19 54% 15 CO
13544 OJVA 17-1 gold 1573 6-7 46% 17 OR
13545 PVC 12-Green 1573 6-3 60% 12 NV
13546 Kaizen Volleyball Club 17-1 1573 2-3 40% 17 NV
13547 TriState Crusaders 12-1 1573 5-3 50% 12 NE
13548 Zona VBC 14-R2 1573 16-5 76% 14 AZ
13549 OVC 13-1 1573 20-17 54% 13 MO
13550 Pipeline 14.1 1573 30-16 64% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.