Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 270 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13451 Red Rock 15-Matt - walnut creek 1574 21-21 50% 15 CA
13452 Ignite 15-1 1574 16-9 59% 15 AL
13453 CSCV 17-1 1574 5-3 63% 17 TX
13454 Tstreet Las Vegas 16-Kenny 1574 16-39 29% 16 CA
13455 Skyline 13-White landon 1574 19-30 35% 13 TX
13456 SSVBC 15-1 1574 24-32 43% 15 NH
13457 MWVC 15-Harold 1574 2-4 33% 15 PR
13458 Elevate VBC 16-Blue 1574 9-14 39% 16 TX
13459 MN Select 12-Maroon 1574 17-8 68% 12 MN
13460 MPV 16-National white 1574 26-26 49% 16 UT
13461 IVC 13-N 1574 3-1 75% 13 AK
13462 Black Hills Juniors NH 13-1 1574 9-2 75% 13 WY
13463 Enspire 14-Timothy 1574 28-14 67% 14 CA
13464 Empower 14-National black 1574 19-22 46% 14 CA
13465 Illini Elite 12-Cardinal 1574 7-4 64% 12 IL
13466 MVA 11-Black 1574 17-11 61% 11 MI
13467 NKYVC 15-3 typhoon 1574 29-31 48% 15 KY
13468 Rallycats 11-Black 1574 3-1 75% 11 IA
13469 Ok Dynamite 14 1574 13-7 59% 14 OK
13470 Midwest Elite VBC 16-1 1574 12-7 63% 16 MO
13471 COLA 14-Blue 1574 18-11 62% 14 CA
13472 TOPEKA FURY 12-1 1574 4-1 80% 12 KS
13473 Rockets 12-G 1574 3-1 75% 12 FL
13474 Bombers VC 12-Rise dev 1574 10-6 53% 12 TX
13475 RockCity 16 N2 1574 30-30 50% 16 OH
13476 SVBC 17-Elite 1574 15-15 50% 17 IA
13477 Minneota 14 1574 6-3 60% 14 MN
13478 Arete Jrs 10-Navy ethos 1574 18-16 50% 10 TX
13479 Lions 13 1574 11-9 55% 13 IN
13480 HV United VBC 11-Red 1574 6-2 60% 11 MI
13481 Black Creek Volleyball Club 13-1 wondercatz 1574 4-1 80% 13 FL
13482 RVC 14-1 chaos 1574 24-15 62% 14 OR
13483 Cincy Classics 14-Gray 1574 25-18 58% 14 OH
13484 LVA U15 1574 27-49 35% 15 VA
13485 RAGE 13-Sidney 1574 27-16 63% 13 CA
13486 Zero Gravity 18-Black 1574 33-23 58% 18 OH
13487 Legit Grey 11 1574 4-1 80% 11 IA
13488 New Wave VBC 12 12-McLoughlin (OV) 1574 5-1 83% 12 OH
13489 Kairos 14-Black 1574 25-18 58% 14 SD
13490 Keahi 18 1574 9-2 64% 18 UT
13491 U2VC 14 1574 4-0 100% 14 VA
13492 Breckenridge 14-Green 1574 3-1 75% 14 ND
13493 Rockhill Blast 16 1574 15-10 60% 16 TX
13494 Top Flight 11-Psi 1574 7-4 64% 11 IL
13495 Apex 12-National red 1574 6-5 55% 12 MO
13496 Summit VC 14-Black 1574 9-5 64% 14 MO
13497 Gary 17-1 1574 25-12 68% 17 GA
13498 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 15-Silver 1574 29-15 66% 15 CO
13499 VPS 12-1 1574 4-1 80% 12 PR
13500 MiElite 16-Ns west 1574 24-13 65% 16 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.