2025-2026 Season — Page 270 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13451 | Red Rock 15-Matt - walnut creek | 1574 | 21-21 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 13452 | Ignite 15-1 | 1574 | 16-9 | 59% | 15 | AL |
| 13453 | CSCV 17-1 | 1574 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 13454 | Tstreet Las Vegas 16-Kenny | 1574 | 16-39 | 29% | 16 | CA |
| 13455 | Skyline 13-White landon | 1574 | 19-30 | 35% | 13 | TX |
| 13456 | SSVBC 15-1 | 1574 | 24-32 | 43% | 15 | NH |
| 13457 | MWVC 15-Harold | 1574 | 2-4 | 33% | 15 | PR |
| 13458 | Elevate VBC 16-Blue | 1574 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | TX |
| 13459 | MN Select 12-Maroon | 1574 | 17-8 | 68% | 12 | MN |
| 13460 | MPV 16-National white | 1574 | 26-26 | 49% | 16 | UT |
| 13461 | IVC 13-N | 1574 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | AK |
| 13462 | Black Hills Juniors NH 13-1 | 1574 | 9-2 | 75% | 13 | WY |
| 13463 | Enspire 14-Timothy | 1574 | 28-14 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 13464 | Empower 14-National black | 1574 | 19-22 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 13465 | Illini Elite 12-Cardinal | 1574 | 7-4 | 64% | 12 | IL |
| 13466 | MVA 11-Black | 1574 | 17-11 | 61% | 11 | MI |
| 13467 | NKYVC 15-3 typhoon | 1574 | 29-31 | 48% | 15 | KY |
| 13468 | Rallycats 11-Black | 1574 | 3-1 | 75% | 11 | IA |
| 13469 | Ok Dynamite 14 | 1574 | 13-7 | 59% | 14 | OK |
| 13470 | Midwest Elite VBC 16-1 | 1574 | 12-7 | 63% | 16 | MO |
| 13471 | COLA 14-Blue | 1574 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 13472 | TOPEKA FURY 12-1 | 1574 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | KS |
| 13473 | Rockets 12-G | 1574 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | FL |
| 13474 | Bombers VC 12-Rise dev | 1574 | 10-6 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 13475 | RockCity 16 N2 | 1574 | 30-30 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 13476 | SVBC 17-Elite | 1574 | 15-15 | 50% | 17 | IA |
| 13477 | Minneota 14 | 1574 | 6-3 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 13478 | Arete Jrs 10-Navy ethos | 1574 | 18-16 | 50% | 10 | TX |
| 13479 | Lions 13 | 1574 | 11-9 | 55% | 13 | IN |
| 13480 | HV United VBC 11-Red | 1574 | 6-2 | 60% | 11 | MI |
| 13481 | Black Creek Volleyball Club 13-1 wondercatz | 1574 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | FL |
| 13482 | RVC 14-1 chaos | 1574 | 24-15 | 62% | 14 | OR |
| 13483 | Cincy Classics 14-Gray | 1574 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | OH |
| 13484 | LVA U15 | 1574 | 27-49 | 35% | 15 | VA |
| 13485 | RAGE 13-Sidney | 1574 | 27-16 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 13486 | Zero Gravity 18-Black | 1574 | 33-23 | 58% | 18 | OH |
| 13487 | Legit Grey 11 | 1574 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | IA |
| 13488 | New Wave VBC 12 12-McLoughlin (OV) | 1574 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | OH |
| 13489 | Kairos 14-Black | 1574 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | SD |
| 13490 | Keahi 18 | 1574 | 9-2 | 64% | 18 | UT |
| 13491 | U2VC 14 | 1574 | 4-0 | 100% | 14 | VA |
| 13492 | Breckenridge 14-Green | 1574 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | ND |
| 13493 | Rockhill Blast 16 | 1574 | 15-10 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 13494 | Top Flight 11-Psi | 1574 | 7-4 | 64% | 11 | IL |
| 13495 | Apex 12-National red | 1574 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | MO |
| 13496 | Summit VC 14-Black | 1574 | 9-5 | 64% | 14 | MO |
| 13497 | Gary 17-1 | 1574 | 25-12 | 68% | 17 | GA |
| 13498 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 15-Silver | 1574 | 29-15 | 66% | 15 | CO |
| 13499 | VPS 12-1 | 1574 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | PR |
| 13500 | MiElite 16-Ns west | 1574 | 24-13 | 65% | 16 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.