Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 269 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13401 Jordan 11-1 1575 6-3 67% 11 MN
13402 Artesanas 17-Zully 1575 9-3 75% 17 PR
13403 SIVBC 17-Heat 1575 21-27 44% 17 WA
13404 Anthem United 17-Agape 1575 23-15 61% 17 GA
13405 Meraki VB 13-3 1575 12-4 71% 13 NH
13406 KCV 14-2 ashlyn 1575 3-2 60% 14 CA
13407 LIVBC Girls 16-Blue 1575 19-24 44% 16 NY
13408 Texas 512 16-Orange 1575 27-21 56% 16 TX
13409 Six Pack Legit 12-G royal 1575 4-2 67% 12 IA
13410 NRG SPORT ACADEMY 13-1 1575 4-2 67% 13 NJ
13411 Unity Volleyball Club 14 Unity Koa 1575 8-3 73% 14 MA
13412 TEJAS 14-Red jeff 1575 15-11 56% 14 TX
13413 City Beach 12-Sam 1575 4-1 80% 12 CA
13414 Lady Sharx 14-Black 1575 13-8 62% 14 CA
13415 Ascent 16-Black 1575 23-21 52% 16 AZ
13416 COVC 16-1 1575 5-9 36% 16 OR
13417 Forza 17-Blk 1575 39-21 65% 17 IL
13418 MOD Elite 12-Blue 1575 14-17 45% 12 IL
13419 Team Momentum 16 Org 1575 30-23 55% 16 MO
13420 BVS 14-14 1 1575 4-2 67% 14 CA
13421 Bucaneras AVC 13 1575 8-6 57% 13 PR
13422 Premier VBC 14-Black 1575 24-22 52% 14 CO
13423 Foothills 12-Teal 1575 25-17 60% 12 WA
13424 CVT PHOENIX GOLD 17 1575 5-4 56% 17 IL
13425 Tamales 14-1 1575 13-6 68% 14 MO
13426 Pirate 14-Chelsey 1575 12-9 57% 14 OR
13427 Next Level 14-2 1575 5-2 71% 14 PR
13428 573 Missouri Juniors 16-2 1575 4-1 80% 16 MO
13429 Freedom 13-White 1575 14-11 56% 13 MO
13430 CVBC 14-2s 1575 16-10 62% 14 IN
13431 208 15-Blue 1575 20-14 59% 15 ID
13432 BLACK ROSE 16-Black 1575 9-7 56% 16 PA
13433 Tribe 14-Premier white 1575 27-18 60% 14 FL
13434 MAVA 13-GreatWhite 1575 32-20 62% 13 KY
13435 Idaho ONE 16-Mccall 1575 13-7 65% 16 ID
13436 O3 14-Blue 1575 32-11 74% 14 MI
13437 Tstreet Las Vegas 16-Danielle 1575 23-30 43% 16 CA
13438 Six Pack Legit 14-G royal 1575 4-2 67% 14 IA
13439 Dynamite 14-Premier 1575 25-11 69% 14 MI
13440 TEJAS 18-Black 1575 4-3 50% 18 TX
13441 Madvic 14-Vert 1575 6-3 67% 14
13442 North Storm VBC 18-1 1574 9-11 41% 18
13443 Enid IMPACT 13-Orange 1574 4-1 80% 13 OK
13444 HOVA 12-R white 1574 7-8 47% 12 OH
13445 HC FLOW 12-River 1574 16-5 76% 12 TX
13446 KIVA 12 Silver 1574 40-33 54% 12 KY
13447 COAST 16-5 izzy g 1574 23-21 52% 16 CA
13448 Aspire 15-White 1574 12-10 55% 15 AZ
13449 JVB 13-White 1574 10-7 59% 13 MN
13450 Vital 12-2 royal 1574 20-11 65% 12 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.