Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 273 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13601 OTVA Volleyball Academy 18-Premier matt 1572 5-2 71% 18 FL
13602 Laidig 10 1572 3-2 60% 10 IN
13603 EVOLUTION RED 14 1572 3-1 75% 14 IA
13604 Omaha Roadrunners 15 1572 3-1 75% 15 NE
13605 VCNebraska 13-Blue 1572 8-5 62% 13 NE
13606 Pgh Elite 14 Gold 1572 14-9 61% 14 PA
13607 LTX SELECT 13-Yellow 1572 13-7 62% 13 TX
13608 EnERgy 12-1 april 1572 7-3 70% 12 MN
13609 SC Legends 15-Black 1572 17-9 65% 15 CA
13610 Spirit 14-Navy 1572 3-0 60% 14 IA
13611 M2 Volleyball 14-N1 1572 34-21 62% 14 GA
13612 Mass Pats 16-1 confidence 1572 23-14 59% 16 MA
13613 CB Elite 12-Navy 1572 4-2 67% 12 WA
13614 HVA 15-RED 1572 19-14 58% 15 TX
13615 Victoria Juniors 13-1 1572 4-1 67% 13 TX
13616 EVC 12-1 black 1572 5-1 83% 12 WA
13617 NIVA 16-GREY 1572 29-15 66% 16 IN
13618 South Central NE 13-Silver 1572 3-1 75% 13 NE
13619 305VBC 13-Rs danny 1572 3-1 75% 13 FL
13620 CUVC 14-Sn madison 1572 13-7 65% 14 NC
13621 Independent 11-Wolfgang 1572 3-1 75% 11 IN
13622 Oxygen 16-White 1572 5-1 83% 16 NJ
13623 TX Impact 12-Pink 1572 3-1 75% 12 TX
13624 Ho'okino VC 14-'ohe 1572 14-9 61% 14 HI
13625 FC Elite 16-Black 1572 20-13 61% 16 WI
13626 SVBC Spirit 13-Elite 1572 4-3 57% 13 IA
13627 Ballyhoo 15-Black 1572 32-23 58% 15 PA
13628 HP Illinois 10-Pink 1572 2-0 67% 10 MO
13629 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 13 13 Rain 1572 13-6 68% 13 WV
13630 SVC NGV 16-Stan 1572 15-18 45% 16 GA
13631 Sideout 12-R faith 1572 18-10 64% 12 NJ
13632 Winter League 10-1 1572 3-1 75% 10 IL
13633 Premier 14-Red f 1572 21-11 66% 14 TX
13634 MAVA 14-1 1572 8-5 57% 14 MN
13635 ID ONE 13-White 1572 3-2 60% 13 ID
13636 BVA 16-National nicole 1572 5-2 71% 16 MN
13637 Calcasieu Impact 11 1572 16-12 57% 11 LA
13638 NWI Premier NWI 14-Blue 1572 3-2 60% 14 IA
13639 Brandywine Volleyball Club 12-1 1572 18-15 53% 12 DE
13640 Arkansas Jrs 12-2 1572 8-3 73% 12 AR
13641 Mean Green 16-1 1572 16-10 62% 16 TX
13642 Select 14-S travel bailie abby 1572 11-5 65% 14 ND
13643 Iowa Juniors 13-S 1572 4-1 80% 13 IA
13644 MAVA 16 1572 11-4 69% 16 MN
13645 A5 Regional 14-Rosaangel 1572 5-1 83% 14 GA
13646 Tribe 16-Premier navy 1572 45-36 56% 16 FL
13647 WSRVC 12-Sdeschenes 1572 7-4 64% 12 WY
13648 Prolink 16-Gabbie 1572 33-23 59% 16 GA
13649 PLVC 11 adidas 1572 7-5 47% 11 MO
13650 Endless 15-Navy 1572 12-15 39% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.