2025-2026 Season — Page 232 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11551 | SAND 15-Black | 1599 | 24-18 | 57% | 15 | UT |
| 11552 | RCVC 17-Raincity royals | 1599 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | BC |
| 11553 | Turlock Crush 13-Teagan | 1599 | 22-17 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 11554 | FORZA1 NORTH 16-National red | 1599 | 15-12 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 11555 | Landshark 16-Black | 1599 | 18-15 | 55% | 16 | KS |
| 11556 | Bemidji 14-Kate | 1599 | 6-3 | 55% | 14 | MN |
| 11557 | Alamo 12 Elite | 1599 | 31-25 | 54% | 12 | TX |
| 11558 | United 17-Bhm national | 1599 | 23-20 | 53% | 17 | AL |
| 11559 | Florida's Sports Coast Elite 14-White | 1599 | 32-31 | 51% | 14 | FL |
| 11560 | HP Illinois 12-Select | 1599 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | IL |
| 11561 | H Skyline 10 Royal | 1599 | 12-9 | 50% | 10 | TX |
| 11562 | Coastal 18-1 national | 1599 | 31-32 | 48% | 18 | MA |
| 11563 | WVBA 13 adidas | 1599 | 32-36 | 47% | 13 | WA |
| 11564 | Tstreet LV 13-Laura | 1599 | 25-30 | 45% | 13 | NV |
| 11565 | Ocean Volleyball 16-National | 1599 | 20-24 | 45% | 16 | NJ |
| 11566 | ECVC 13-BLACK | 1599 | 25-31 | 45% | 13 | VA |
| 11567 | NNVC 18 | 1599 | 20-20 | 44% | 18 | VA |
| 11568 | Munciana 15 Warriors | 1599 | 30-39 | 43% | 15 | IN |
| 11569 | Sunshine 15 Westside | 1599 | 25-37 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 11570 | Pakmen 13-Gold | 1599 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | ON |
| 11571 | clubSAV 14-National val | 1599 | 17-28 | 38% | 14 | GA |
| 11572 | Dinos 14-1 | 1599 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | AB |
| 11573 | Adversity G14 Adidas | 1599 | 15-29 | 34% | 14 | IL |
| 11574 | 305VBC 12-S roberto | 1599 | 35-16 | 69% | 12 | FL |
| 11575 | HVVC 12-Purple | 1599 | 12-3 | 75% | 12 | MI |
| 11576 | Legit 12-Royal | 1599 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | |
| 11577 | FAUCONS WHITE 14 | 1599 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | |
| 11578 | Gary 17-1 | 1599 | 11-5 | 69% | 17 | |
| 11579 | Independent 14-Zona | 1599 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | |
| 11580 | Ridgeland Reds 12-Red | 1599 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | |
| 11581 | NWJRS 16-Platinum | 1599 | 35-35 | 50% | 16 | |
| 11582 | Platform Elite 15-Adidas | 1599 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | |
| 11583 | Integrity 15-Vinson | 1599 | 4-1 | 80% | 15 | PA |
| 11584 | Apex Volleyball Club 14-2 | 1599 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | MO |
| 11585 | SF Elite 12 Ella | 1599 | 13-12 | 52% | 12 | CA |
| 11586 | Iron 15-Black | 1598 | 11-4 | 73% | 15 | |
| 11587 | WSRVC 17 | 1598 | 2-6 | 25% | 17 | |
| 11588 | BVBC 10-1 | 1598 | 4-1 | 80% | 10 | IN |
| 11589 | TPV 11-Red | 1598 | 25-13 | 66% | 11 | |
| 11590 | UNION 12-Ky white | 1598 | 26-18 | 59% | 12 | CA |
| 11591 | Princeton 12-Black | 1598 | 15-10 | 60% | 12 | NJ |
| 11592 | United 18 Jason | 1598 | 18-12 | 60% | 18 | CO |
| 11593 | Crimson 15-National | 1598 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | MA |
| 11594 | VSTX 13-4 aleman | 1598 | 2-0 | 100% | 13 | TX |
| 11595 | Anthem United 12-Navy | 1598 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | GA |
| 11596 | Impact 13-Jos/lauren | 1598 | 10-2 | 83% | 13 | MI |
| 11597 | FIVA 18-Daph | 1598 | 17-5 | 77% | 18 | FL |
| 11598 | OK Charge 13-1 west | 1598 | 25-9 | 74% | 13 | OK |
| 11599 | Genesis 14-White | 1598 | 24-9 | 73% | 14 | TN |
| 11600 | CCVC 14-National | 1598 | 31-12 | 72% | 14 | AL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.