Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 232 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11551 SAND 15-Black 1599 24-18 57% 15 UT
11552 RCVC 17-Raincity royals 1599 4-3 57% 17 BC
11553 Turlock Crush 13-Teagan 1599 22-17 56% 13 CA
11554 FORZA1 NORTH 16-National red 1599 15-12 56% 16 CA
11555 Landshark 16-Black 1599 18-15 55% 16 KS
11556 Bemidji 14-Kate 1599 6-3 55% 14 MN
11557 Alamo 12 Elite 1599 31-25 54% 12 TX
11558 United 17-Bhm national 1599 23-20 53% 17 AL
11559 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 14-White 1599 32-31 51% 14 FL
11560 HP Illinois 12-Select 1599 15-15 50% 12 IL
11561 H Skyline 10 Royal 1599 12-9 50% 10 TX
11562 Coastal 18-1 national 1599 31-32 48% 18 MA
11563 WVBA 13 adidas 1599 32-36 47% 13 WA
11564 Tstreet LV 13-Laura 1599 25-30 45% 13 NV
11565 Ocean Volleyball 16-National 1599 20-24 45% 16 NJ
11566 ECVC 13-BLACK 1599 25-31 45% 13 VA
11567 NNVC 18 1599 20-20 44% 18 VA
11568 Munciana 15 Warriors 1599 30-39 43% 15 IN
11569 Sunshine 15 Westside 1599 25-37 40% 15 CA
11570 Pakmen 13-Gold 1599 2-3 40% 13 ON
11571 clubSAV 14-National val 1599 17-28 38% 14 GA
11572 Dinos 14-1 1599 3-5 38% 14 AB
11573 Adversity G14 Adidas 1599 15-29 34% 14 IL
11574 305VBC 12-S roberto 1599 35-16 69% 12 FL
11575 HVVC 12-Purple 1599 12-3 75% 12 MI
11576 Legit 12-Royal 1599 4-1 80% 12
11577 FAUCONS WHITE 14 1599 6-2 75% 14
11578 Gary 17-1 1599 11-5 69% 17
11579 Independent 14-Zona 1599 4-2 67% 14
11580 Ridgeland Reds 12-Red 1599 5-4 56% 12
11581 NWJRS 16-Platinum 1599 35-35 50% 16
11582 Platform Elite 15-Adidas 1599 2-5 29% 15
11583 Integrity 15-Vinson 1599 4-1 80% 15 PA
11584 Apex Volleyball Club 14-2 1599 6-2 75% 14 MO
11585 SF Elite 12 Ella 1599 13-12 52% 12 CA
11586 Iron 15-Black 1598 11-4 73% 15
11587 WSRVC 17 1598 2-6 25% 17
11588 BVBC 10-1 1598 4-1 80% 10 IN
11589 TPV 11-Red 1598 25-13 66% 11
11590 UNION 12-Ky white 1598 26-18 59% 12 CA
11591 Princeton 12-Black 1598 15-10 60% 12 NJ
11592 United 18 Jason 1598 18-12 60% 18 CO
11593 Crimson 15-National 1598 33-21 61% 15 MA
11594 VSTX 13-4 aleman 1598 2-0 100% 13 TX
11595 Anthem United 12-Navy 1598 5-0 100% 12 GA
11596 Impact 13-Jos/lauren 1598 10-2 83% 13 MI
11597 FIVA 18-Daph 1598 17-5 77% 18 FL
11598 OK Charge 13-1 west 1598 25-9 74% 13 OK
11599 Genesis 14-White 1598 24-9 73% 14 TN
11600 CCVC 14-National 1598 31-12 72% 14 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.