2025-2026 Season — Page 233 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11601 | SIVA 17-Black | 1598 | 34-19 | 64% | 17 | ID |
| 11602 | Little Red Volleyball Club 16 Little Red Heat (XL) | 1598 | 8-3 | 47% | 16 | NY |
| 11603 | DVA 13 Elite | 1598 | 24-17 | 57% | 13 | PA |
| 11604 | UVA 14-S elite | 1598 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | LA |
| 11605 | Valley Juniors 15 Jason | 1598 | 25-24 | 51% | 15 | VA |
| 11606 | BW Wave 14 | 1598 | 13-8 | 62% | 14 | MI |
| 11607 | REPUBLIC VC 15-Blue | 1598 | 37-17 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 11608 | SA Abyss 14-1 black | 1598 | 18-6 | 75% | 14 | TX |
| 11609 | Panhandle Powerhouse 12 | 1598 | 9-4 | 64% | 12 | NE |
| 11610 | FSJ 12-National | 1598 | 31-16 | 65% | 12 | AR |
| 11611 | SOUTH SHORE 14-Mizuno | 1598 | 14-11 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 11612 | Legacy 13-1 (OV) | 1598 | 9-4 | 69% | 13 | OH |
| 11613 | Lakes Elite 16-1 | 1598 | 9-7 | 56% | 16 | MN |
| 11614 | Husky 14-New england black | 1598 | 29-15 | 66% | 14 | CT |
| 11615 | Moorhead Juniors 12-2 | 1598 | 11-6 | 55% | 12 | ND |
| 11616 | Southwest 12-E olivia | 1598 | 31-20 | 61% | 12 | OH |
| 11617 | ME VA 13-Orange | 1598 | 16-6 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 11618 | Pulse 15 Camerlengo | 1598 | 34-20 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 11619 | Six Pack Legit 12-G white | 1598 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | IA |
| 11620 | VSTX 13-4 aleman | 1598 | 2-0 | 100% | 13 | TX |
| 11621 | AZ REV 11-Premier | 1598 | 36-32 | 53% | 11 | AZ |
| 11622 | BORINQUEN COQUI 18-1f | 1598 | 4-11 | 27% | 18 | PR |
| 11623 | MVA 18-Bekah | 1598 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | ID |
| 11624 | AP 14-Neon | 1598 | 21-20 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 11625 | DIVC 14-Silver | 1598 | 23-9 | 70% | 14 | IL |
| 11626 | Dinos 14-1 | 1598 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | WA |
| 11627 | ID Impact 13-Kelsie | 1598 | 11-9 | 55% | 13 | WA |
| 11628 | Tempest Volleyball 15-1 | 1598 | 18-6 | 75% | 15 | FL |
| 11629 | Fever 14 | 1598 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | NV |
| 11630 | Eastside 14-Caleb | 1598 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 | NC |
| 11631 | EMV 16-Black creshia | 1598 | 5-12 | 25% | 16 | TX |
| 11632 | Texas Elite Legends 14-1 | 1598 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 11633 | CRSURGEVBC 15-Jeff | 1598 | 17-11 | 55% | 15 | IA |
| 11634 | TI Elite 15 SS | 1598 | 25-14 | 64% | 15 | IN |
| 11635 | PerfElite 15-1 | 1598 | 28-15 | 65% | 15 | NY |
| 11636 | PANA'EWA 14-Ku | 1598 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | HI |
| 11637 | LKN Swarm 13 Gold | 1598 | 61-36 | 63% | 13 | NC |
| 11638 | Top Flight SC 14 Eagle | 1598 | 17-13 | 57% | 14 | SC |
| 11639 | United 15-Bhm national | 1598 | 24-20 | 55% | 15 | AL |
| 11640 | Fresno Heat HEAT 12-National khanh | 1597 | 16-9 | 64% | 12 | CA |
| 11641 | LIVBC Girls 15-Red | 1597 | 15-8 | 65% | 15 | NY |
| 11642 | Michio Chicago 11-Seahawks | 1597 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | IL |
| 11643 | HPSTL 10-White | 1597 | 13-6 | 65% | 10 | MO |
| 11644 | AE VBC 14 | 1597 | 26-10 | 72% | 14 | CA |
| 11645 | Mesa Juniors VBCO 12-Teal | 1597 | 3-0 | 75% | 12 | CO |
| 11646 | South Shore Slam 14-Lime | 1597 | 16-7 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 11647 | Impact Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1597 | 84-46 | 63% | 14 | MO |
| 11648 | CHiX 16-BLACK | 1597 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | OH |
| 11649 | Legit 12-G gray | 1597 | 5-1 | 71% | 12 | IA |
| 11650 | JVC 13-Gold | 1597 | 12-3 | 67% | 13 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.