Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 233 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11601 SIVA 17-Black 1598 34-19 64% 17 ID
11602 Little Red Volleyball Club 16 Little Red Heat (XL) 1598 8-3 47% 16 NY
11603 DVA 13 Elite 1598 24-17 57% 13 PA
11604 UVA 14-S elite 1598 2-2 50% 14 LA
11605 Valley Juniors 15 Jason 1598 25-24 51% 15 VA
11606 BW Wave 14 1598 13-8 62% 14 MI
11607 REPUBLIC VC 15-Blue 1598 37-17 69% 15 TX
11608 SA Abyss 14-1 black 1598 18-6 75% 14 TX
11609 Panhandle Powerhouse 12 1598 9-4 64% 12 NE
11610 FSJ 12-National 1598 31-16 65% 12 AR
11611 SOUTH SHORE 14-Mizuno 1598 14-11 56% 14 TX
11612 Legacy 13-1 (OV) 1598 9-4 69% 13 OH
11613 Lakes Elite 16-1 1598 9-7 56% 16 MN
11614 Husky 14-New england black 1598 29-15 66% 14 CT
11615 Moorhead Juniors 12-2 1598 11-6 55% 12 ND
11616 Southwest 12-E olivia 1598 31-20 61% 12 OH
11617 ME VA 13-Orange 1598 16-6 70% 13 TX
11618 Pulse 15 Camerlengo 1598 34-20 63% 15 CA
11619 Six Pack Legit 12-G white 1598 4-2 67% 12 IA
11620 VSTX 13-4 aleman 1598 2-0 100% 13 TX
11621 AZ REV 11-Premier 1598 36-32 53% 11 AZ
11622 BORINQUEN COQUI 18-1f 1598 4-11 27% 18 PR
11623 MVA 18-Bekah 1598 4-2 67% 18 ID
11624 AP 14-Neon 1598 21-20 50% 14 TX
11625 DIVC 14-Silver 1598 23-9 70% 14 IL
11626 Dinos 14-1 1598 3-5 38% 14 WA
11627 ID Impact 13-Kelsie 1598 11-9 55% 13 WA
11628 Tempest Volleyball 15-1 1598 18-6 75% 15 FL
11629 Fever 14 1598 8-4 67% 14 NV
11630 Eastside 14-Caleb 1598 11-6 65% 14 NC
11631 EMV 16-Black creshia 1598 5-12 25% 16 TX
11632 Texas Elite Legends 14-1 1598 13-6 68% 14 TX
11633 CRSURGEVBC 15-Jeff 1598 17-11 55% 15 IA
11634 TI Elite 15 SS 1598 25-14 64% 15 IN
11635 PerfElite 15-1 1598 28-15 65% 15 NY
11636 PANA'EWA 14-Ku 1598 4-1 80% 14 HI
11637 LKN Swarm 13 Gold 1598 61-36 63% 13 NC
11638 Top Flight SC 14 Eagle 1598 17-13 57% 14 SC
11639 United 15-Bhm national 1598 24-20 55% 15 AL
11640 Fresno Heat HEAT 12-National khanh 1597 16-9 64% 12 CA
11641 LIVBC Girls 15-Red 1597 15-8 65% 15 NY
11642 Michio Chicago 11-Seahawks 1597 4-1 80% 11 IL
11643 HPSTL 10-White 1597 13-6 65% 10 MO
11644 AE VBC 14 1597 26-10 72% 14 CA
11645 Mesa Juniors VBCO 12-Teal 1597 3-0 75% 12 CO
11646 South Shore Slam 14-Lime 1597 16-7 70% 14 WI
11647 Impact Volleyball Club 14-1 1597 84-46 63% 14 MO
11648 CHiX 16-BLACK 1597 30-16 65% 16 OH
11649 Legit 12-G gray 1597 5-1 71% 12 IA
11650 JVC 13-Gold 1597 12-3 67% 13 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.