2025-2026 Season — Page 234 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11651 | PSVBC 12-Premier | 1597 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | WV |
| 11652 | WWVA 14-1 nighthawks | 1597 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | CO |
| 11653 | Ichiban 14-Resilience | 1597 | 24-19 | 56% | 14 | GA |
| 11654 | Mater Dei Jr Cats 14-Spahn | 1597 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | IN |
| 11655 | Iowa Select Evolution 14-Red | 1597 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | IA |
| 11656 | CID 16-Blue | 1597 | 28-14 | 67% | 16 | ID |
| 11657 | TX VISION 18 | 1597 | 22-10 | 69% | 18 | TX |
| 11658 | Elite Alliance Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1597 | 30-17 | 64% | 17 | SD |
| 11659 | Crossroads 15 | 1597 | 19-6 | 73% | 15 | TX |
| 11660 | Grandlake 13-Rodgers | 1597 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | OH |
| 11661 | Madtown 13-Red | 1597 | 7-3 | 70% | 13 | WI |
| 11662 | Omni 11-N1 | 1597 | 39-20 | 66% | 11 | AZ |
| 11663 | Tempest Volleyball 16-1 | 1597 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | FL |
| 11664 | AVA 18-Ikaika | 1597 | 7-1 | 88% | 18 | FL |
| 11665 | Sky High 13-Cl spr 1 | 1597 | 3-0 | 100% | 13 | IL |
| 11666 | FUSION 12-1 (NO) | 1597 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | MN |
| 11667 | Volisur 15-1 | 1597 | 10-8 | 56% | 15 | PR |
| 11668 | Reign 13-Black | 1597 | 42-26 | 62% | 13 | FL |
| 11669 | Mt. Hood 12-3 alpine | 1597 | 10-5 | 67% | 12 | OR |
| 11670 | BPR 14 | 1597 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | PR |
| 11671 | ETA1 12-Black | 1597 | 7-4 | 58% | 12 | TX |
| 11672 | Club GSL 16-Elect - davis | 1597 | 37-28 | 57% | 16 | UT |
| 11673 | Boss CLE 14-3 | 1597 | 27-19 | 59% | 14 | OH |
| 11674 | WGVA 15-Black | 1597 | 24-35 | 41% | 15 | GA |
| 11675 | Arkansas Jrs 15-1 | 1597 | 6-4 | 60% | 15 | AR |
| 11676 | Idaho Peak IFJS BRI 14-S | 1597 | 4-9 | 31% | 14 | ID |
| 11677 | FC Elite 13-Ex | 1597 | 10-5 | 63% | 13 | WI |
| 11678 | DCVA 15-Aaron | 1597 | 22-16 | 58% | 15 | NM |
| 11679 | Cloud Peak 13 Elite | 1597 | 39-18 | 67% | 13 | WY |
| 11680 | Ridgeland Reds 12-Red | 1597 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | MN |
| 11681 | AFVBC 15 Everest | 1597 | 30-24 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 11682 | Ignite AZ 14-National 2 | 1597 | 42-25 | 63% | 14 | AZ |
| 11683 | CHAMP 15-1 | 1597 | 11-6 | 61% | 15 | AL |
| 11684 | Ocean Volleyball 16-National | 1597 | 31-33 | 48% | 16 | NJ |
| 11685 | STL Crossfire 11 SR1 | 1597 | 16-13 | 55% | 11 | MO |
| 11686 | HHVBC 12-1 | 1597 | 10-4 | 63% | 12 | IA |
| 11687 | Piedmont VBC 15-Nike | 1597 | 40-24 | 63% | 15 | NC |
| 11688 | HJV 17-National | 1597 | 36-26 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 11689 | East Texas 15-B | 1597 | 18-6 | 62% | 15 | LA |
| 11690 | Texas United 12-Red | 1597 | 17-11 | 61% | 12 | TX |
| 11691 | Wythe Elite 15-Blue | 1597 | 14-10 | 58% | 15 | TN |
| 11692 | 1W 14-2 elite | 1597 | 21-13 | 62% | 14 | WI |
| 11693 | MVIce 18-P cass | 1597 | 4-7 | 36% | 18 | UT |
| 11694 | Machine VBC 14-1 | 1597 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | NV |
| 11695 | Hive Volleyball 15-Gold | 1597 | 25-37 | 40% | 15 | UT |
| 11696 | BSVBC 11-Blue | 1597 | 16-6 | 64% | 11 | IL |
| 11697 | I AM VBC 15 Gold | 1597 | 27-15 | 64% | 15 | WI |
| 11698 | WBLVC 12-1 | 1597 | 23-12 | 64% | 12 | MN |
| 11699 | MAC 14-2 premier | 1597 | 27-16 | 63% | 14 | OR |
| 11700 | Southern Focus Volleyball Club 15 Power Focus | 1596 | 23-14 | 62% | 15 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.