Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 234 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11651 PSVBC 12-Premier 1597 7-2 78% 12 WV
11652 WWVA 14-1 nighthawks 1597 4-1 80% 14 CO
11653 Ichiban 14-Resilience 1597 24-19 56% 14 GA
11654 Mater Dei Jr Cats 14-Spahn 1597 14-6 70% 14 IN
11655 Iowa Select Evolution 14-Red 1597 5-1 83% 14 IA
11656 CID 16-Blue 1597 28-14 67% 16 ID
11657 TX VISION 18 1597 22-10 69% 18 TX
11658 Elite Alliance Volleyball Club 17-1 1597 30-17 64% 17 SD
11659 Crossroads 15 1597 19-6 73% 15 TX
11660 Grandlake 13-Rodgers 1597 3-1 75% 13 OH
11661 Madtown 13-Red 1597 7-3 70% 13 WI
11662 Omni 11-N1 1597 39-20 66% 11 AZ
11663 Tempest Volleyball 16-1 1597 8-1 89% 16 FL
11664 AVA 18-Ikaika 1597 7-1 88% 18 FL
11665 Sky High 13-Cl spr 1 1597 3-0 100% 13 IL
11666 FUSION 12-1 (NO) 1597 10-2 83% 12 MN
11667 Volisur 15-1 1597 10-8 56% 15 PR
11668 Reign 13-Black 1597 42-26 62% 13 FL
11669 Mt. Hood 12-3 alpine 1597 10-5 67% 12 OR
11670 BPR 14 1597 8-2 80% 14 PR
11671 ETA1 12-Black 1597 7-4 58% 12 TX
11672 Club GSL 16-Elect - davis 1597 37-28 57% 16 UT
11673 Boss CLE 14-3 1597 27-19 59% 14 OH
11674 WGVA 15-Black 1597 24-35 41% 15 GA
11675 Arkansas Jrs 15-1 1597 6-4 60% 15 AR
11676 Idaho Peak IFJS BRI 14-S 1597 4-9 31% 14 ID
11677 FC Elite 13-Ex 1597 10-5 63% 13 WI
11678 DCVA 15-Aaron 1597 22-16 58% 15 NM
11679 Cloud Peak 13 Elite 1597 39-18 67% 13 WY
11680 Ridgeland Reds 12-Red 1597 5-4 56% 12 MN
11681 AFVBC 15 Everest 1597 30-24 56% 15 CA
11682 Ignite AZ 14-National 2 1597 42-25 63% 14 AZ
11683 CHAMP 15-1 1597 11-6 61% 15 AL
11684 Ocean Volleyball 16-National 1597 31-33 48% 16 NJ
11685 STL Crossfire 11 SR1 1597 16-13 55% 11 MO
11686 HHVBC 12-1 1597 10-4 63% 12 IA
11687 Piedmont VBC 15-Nike 1597 40-24 63% 15 NC
11688 HJV 17-National 1597 36-26 58% 17 TX
11689 East Texas 15-B 1597 18-6 62% 15 LA
11690 Texas United 12-Red 1597 17-11 61% 12 TX
11691 Wythe Elite 15-Blue 1597 14-10 58% 15 TN
11692 1W 14-2 elite 1597 21-13 62% 14 WI
11693 MVIce 18-P cass 1597 4-7 36% 18 UT
11694 Machine VBC 14-1 1597 3-4 43% 14 NV
11695 Hive Volleyball 15-Gold 1597 25-37 40% 15 UT
11696 BSVBC 11-Blue 1597 16-6 64% 11 IL
11697 I AM VBC 15 Gold 1597 27-15 64% 15 WI
11698 WBLVC 12-1 1597 23-12 64% 12 MN
11699 MAC 14-2 premier 1597 27-16 63% 14 OR
11700 Southern Focus Volleyball Club 15 Power Focus 1596 23-14 62% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.