2025-2026 Season — Page 235 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11701 | Big Sky 17-1 westside | 1596 | 31-18 | 60% | 17 | MT |
| 11702 | Xcel VB 14-1 adidas | 1596 | 21-15 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 11703 | Empire 14-National kelsey | 1596 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | CA |
| 11704 | IMUA UVC 14-Ua | 1596 | 23-17 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 11705 | Spiketown VBC 11-1 | 1596 | 3-1 | 75% | 11 | OH |
| 11706 | Shonto 12-S green | 1596 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | CA |
| 11707 | MDJRS 16-Elite yellow | 1596 | 43-23 | 64% | 16 | MD |
| 11708 | Team Atlantis 13-Miller | 1596 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | OH |
| 11709 | NW Arkansas Juniors Storm 17-National | 1596 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | AR |
| 11710 | SVC 14 Gold | 1596 | 14-10 | 58% | 14 | IA |
| 11711 | Al Volleyball 18 18 | 1596 | 7-2 | 70% | 18 | NY |
| 11712 | Momentous VBC 15-Kai | 1596 | 17-10 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 11713 | ECVC 16-National - jacqui | 1596 | 12-10 | 55% | 16 | AL |
| 11714 | Eagles BEA 15-1 | 1596 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | PA |
| 11715 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1596 | 6-3 | 38% | 16 | KS |
| 11716 | 915 13-Blue | 1596 | 27-31 | 46% | 13 | TX |
| 11717 | Illini Elite 14-Navy | 1596 | 9-5 | 64% | 14 | IL |
| 11718 | CMVBC 14 | 1596 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | NE |
| 11719 | Diablos 13-20 | 1596 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | NV |
| 11720 | AVA 18-N robinson | 1596 | 16-14 | 53% | 18 | OH |
| 11721 | Apex NW 15-Summit | 1596 | 25-30 | 45% | 15 | WA |
| 11722 | Aus Velocity 13-2 emerald | 1596 | 27-13 | 68% | 13 | TX |
| 11723 | Decatur Force 11 Teal | 1596 | 19-10 | 66% | 11 | IN |
| 11724 | 307 Impact Impact 12-Kayla | 1596 | 19-10 | 66% | 12 | WY |
| 11725 | Prodigy 14-Red | 1596 | 22-15 | 59% | 14 | KY |
| 11726 | Horseshoe VBC 15-Black | 1596 | 21-11 | 66% | 15 | PA |
| 11727 | SF Stars 13 | 1596 | 36-19 | 65% | 13 | CA |
| 11728 | NM Cactus 12-Dogs | 1596 | 16-8 | 67% | 12 | NM |
| 11729 | UVC 14 | 1596 | 12-7 | 63% | 14 | WA |
| 11730 | LKN 14-1 | 1596 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | NC |
| 11731 | Team Momentum 12 Navy | 1596 | 31-28 | 51% | 12 | MO |
| 11732 | BOOST 15 Navy | 1596 | 23-13 | 57% | 15 | IA |
| 11733 | Katy Volleyball 15-Nike | 1596 | 20-13 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 11734 | Mighty Mo 16-Reed | 1596 | 10-10 | 40% | 16 | MT |
| 11735 | Libero Volleyball Club 15-Huskies | 1596 | 53-40 | 57% | 15 | VA |
| 11736 | Storm 13-Adidas | 1596 | 37-22 | 63% | 13 | AR |
| 11737 | Ignite VBCF 15-Premier | 1596 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | NV |
| 11738 | SoCal VBC 17-Cardiff | 1596 | 23-21 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 11739 | Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 14 14 Thunder (OV) | 1596 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | WV |
| 11740 | FCA Force 18-1 shane | 1596 | 16-9 | 64% | 18 | NC |
| 11741 | Urban VBC 11 | 1596 | 3-5 | 30% | 11 | TX |
| 11742 | Lomanview 10-Ileana | 1596 | 3-3 | 50% | 10 | PR |
| 11743 | SUSA 17-1 | 1596 | 17-10 | 63% | 17 | UT |
| 11744 | Four1Nine Xtreme 17 17-Horn (OV) (39) | 1596 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | OH |
| 11745 | SF Elite 17 Samantha | 1596 | 26-24 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 11746 | Sizzle Academy 15-N1 | 1596 | 33-22 | 60% | 15 | AZ |
| 11747 | NW Elite 18-1 gold | 1596 | 20-16 | 56% | 18 | OR |
| 11748 | AAVA 16-2 rain | 1596 | 25-22 | 53% | 16 | OR |
| 11749 | FCE 14-1 | 1596 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | FL |
| 11750 | Texas One 14-Navy | 1596 | 14-9 | 56% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.