Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 235 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11701 Big Sky 17-1 westside 1596 31-18 60% 17 MT
11702 Xcel VB 14-1 adidas 1596 21-15 58% 14 TX
11703 Empire 14-National kelsey 1596 2-5 29% 14 CA
11704 IMUA UVC 14-Ua 1596 23-17 57% 14 CA
11705 Spiketown VBC 11-1 1596 3-1 75% 11 OH
11706 Shonto 12-S green 1596 6-2 75% 12 CA
11707 MDJRS 16-Elite yellow 1596 43-23 64% 16 MD
11708 Team Atlantis 13-Miller 1596 4-1 80% 13 OH
11709 NW Arkansas Juniors Storm 17-National 1596 6-2 75% 17 AR
11710 SVC 14 Gold 1596 14-10 58% 14 IA
11711 Al Volleyball 18 18 1596 7-2 70% 18 NY
11712 Momentous VBC 15-Kai 1596 17-10 63% 15 CA
11713 ECVC 16-National - jacqui 1596 12-10 55% 16 AL
11714 Eagles BEA 15-1 1596 5-2 71% 15 PA
11715 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-1 1596 6-3 38% 16 KS
11716 915 13-Blue 1596 27-31 46% 13 TX
11717 Illini Elite 14-Navy 1596 9-5 64% 14 IL
11718 CMVBC 14 1596 6-3 67% 14 NE
11719 Diablos 13-20 1596 5-3 63% 13 NV
11720 AVA 18-N robinson 1596 16-14 53% 18 OH
11721 Apex NW 15-Summit 1596 25-30 45% 15 WA
11722 Aus Velocity 13-2 emerald 1596 27-13 68% 13 TX
11723 Decatur Force 11 Teal 1596 19-10 66% 11 IN
11724 307 Impact Impact 12-Kayla 1596 19-10 66% 12 WY
11725 Prodigy 14-Red 1596 22-15 59% 14 KY
11726 Horseshoe VBC 15-Black 1596 21-11 66% 15 PA
11727 SF Stars 13 1596 36-19 65% 13 CA
11728 NM Cactus 12-Dogs 1596 16-8 67% 12 NM
11729 UVC 14 1596 12-7 63% 14 WA
11730 LKN 14-1 1596 18-11 62% 14 NC
11731 Team Momentum 12 Navy 1596 31-28 51% 12 MO
11732 BOOST 15 Navy 1596 23-13 57% 15 IA
11733 Katy Volleyball 15-Nike 1596 20-13 61% 15 TX
11734 Mighty Mo 16-Reed 1596 10-10 40% 16 MT
11735 Libero Volleyball Club 15-Huskies 1596 53-40 57% 15 VA
11736 Storm 13-Adidas 1596 37-22 63% 13 AR
11737 Ignite VBCF 15-Premier 1596 5-3 63% 15 NV
11738 SoCal VBC 17-Cardiff 1596 23-21 52% 17 CA
11739 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 14 14 Thunder (OV) 1596 5-1 83% 14 WV
11740 FCA Force 18-1 shane 1596 16-9 64% 18 NC
11741 Urban VBC 11 1596 3-5 30% 11 TX
11742 Lomanview 10-Ileana 1596 3-3 50% 10 PR
11743 SUSA 17-1 1596 17-10 63% 17 UT
11744 Four1Nine Xtreme 17 17-Horn (OV) (39) 1596 5-1 83% 17 OH
11745 SF Elite 17 Samantha 1596 26-24 52% 17 CA
11746 Sizzle Academy 15-N1 1596 33-22 60% 15 AZ
11747 NW Elite 18-1 gold 1596 20-16 56% 18 OR
11748 AAVA 16-2 rain 1596 25-22 53% 16 OR
11749 FCE 14-1 1596 7-8 47% 14 FL
11750 Texas One 14-Navy 1596 14-9 56% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.