Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 231 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11501 Airdrie Hawks 15-Girls white 1600 6-1 86% 15
11502 Powerwest Volleyball Club 15-Air 1600 7-2 78% 15
11503 Coastal Crushers Volleyball 15-Ug 1600 7-2 78% 15
11504 VAQUE 17-1 1600 6-2 75% 17
11505 Empower Volleyball 17-National black 1600 6-3 67% 17 CA
11506 Clarksville VBC 12-1 1600 10-3 67% 12 TN
11507 RVT 15-2 swim 1600 22-12 65% 15 NY
11508 FAV 18 Maverick 1600 7-4 64% 18 CA
11509 LKN 14-1 1600 18-11 62% 14 NC
11510 WB 15-Red 1599 14-6 70% 15
11511 Osage County Volleyball Club 15-1 1599 4-7 25% 15
11512 KVC 17 1599 19-7 68% 17
11513 SWMNVB 15-2 1599 26-17 60% 15
11514 CVC 11-1 ashley 1599 10-9 53% 11
11515 PJVC 11-Maroon 1599 3-0 100% 11
11516 Lakes Elite 16-1 1599 9-7 56% 16
11517 Spiketown Door County 14 1599 6-0 100% 14 WI
11518 UEPA 12-D 1599 23-19 52% 12 TX
11519 SA Empire 13-Royal 1599 19-12 59% 13 TX
11520 AVA 18-Ikaika 1599 7-1 88% 18 OH
11521 DJVBC 15-1 1599 5-1 83% 15 DE
11522 KCV 17-1 michelle 1599 5-1 83% 17 CA
11523 Mindset Premier 14-White 1599 35-12 74% 14 IL
11524 Atomic Force 12-1 1599 11-3 73% 12 AZ
11525 Coastal VBC 18-White 1599 23-7 72% 18 MD
11526 SBVC Girls 15 Elite 1599 25-10 71% 15 CA
11527 OBX Wave 14-Black regional plus 1599 12-5 71% 14 NC
11528 913Athletics 16-2 1599 5-2 71% 16 KS
11529 DIVC 14-Silver 1599 23-9 70% 14 IL
11530 Accelerate 14-Pink 1599 28-13 68% 14 NY
11531 BftSel 18 1599 21-10 68% 18 SC
11532 AVC CLE 10-Red 1599 6-3 67% 10 OH
11533 Illusions Volleyball 17 1599 28-14 67% 17 TX
11534 Cape Coast 13-Odin 1599 19-10 66% 13 FL
11535 TX Legends 18-Black 1599 25-13 66% 18 TX
11536 NIVA 16 JADE 1599 22-12 65% 16 IN
11537 I AM VBC 15 Gold 1599 27-15 64% 15 WI
11538 Panhandle Powerhouse 12 1599 9-4 64% 12 NE
11539 VCNebraska 16-Blue 1599 16-9 64% 16 NE
11540 Mililani 15-S 1599 27-16 63% 15 HI
11541 Junior Orioles 12 1599 30-18 63% 12 IN
11542 BRAVO 14-Red 1599 29-17 63% 14 KY
11543 KS Rise 16-1 1599 8-5 62% 16 KS
11544 East Texas 15-B 1599 18-6 62% 15 TX
11545 BAVC 18-National joslin 1599 12-8 60% 18 CA
11546 Fr Challenge Elite 12 Mag 1599 27-11 60% 12 TX
11547 Grandlake 12-Thobe 1599 3-2 60% 12 OH
11548 KODA 16 Silver 1599 23-15 59% 16 NY
11549 SVC 14 Gold 1599 14-10 58% 14 IA
11550 VC Denver 12-Black 1599 26-19 58% 12 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.