Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 230 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11451 Eastside 14-Caleb 1600 11-6 65% 14 OH
11452 FSJ 12-National 1600 31-16 65% 12 AR
11453 Apex Volleyball Club 12-1 1600 4-2 67% 12 MO
11454 Air VBC 18-N 1600 4-0 100% 18 WI
11455 Integrity Elite 10 1600 4-0 100% 10 IL
11456 Southwest Extreme 16-1 1600 7-1 88% 16 LA
11457 FTL 17-Fusion usa-liberty alex 1600 5-1 83% 17 FL
11458 WI Flight 11 Antigo 1600 7-2 78% 11 WI
11459 Madtown 12-Red 1600 3-0 75% 12 WI
11460 319 United 16 Kylie 1600 8-3 73% 16 IA
11461 STMATT 10-1 1600 8-3 73% 10 IN
11462 CINCY EAST 12-3 white 1600 11-4 73% 12 OH
11463 MCV 13-Bullion 1600 8-3 73% 13 NC
11464 Iowa Elite 13-Storm 1600 15-6 71% 13 IA
11465 Diablo Black 14-1 1600 5-2 71% 14 CA
11466 diggersz 16-Chris 1600 14-5 70% 16 IL
11467 FaR Out 14 Maroon 1600 30-13 70% 14 MI
11468 Impact VC 13-1 1600 17-8 68% 13 TX
11469 AP 13-Lite highlighter 1600 13-5 68% 13 TX
11470 SWVBC G13-WHITE 1600 13-6 68% 13 WI
11471 CNVKC Mizuno 16-Jordan 1600 16-8 67% 16 MO
11472 LONG BEACH 16-Jon 1600 5-3 63% 16 CA
11473 VOLT 12-Power 1600 13-6 62% 12 ND
11474 River City Jrs 14-Red 1600 26-16 62% 14 NE
11475 Midwest United 16 NAVY 1600 43-26 62% 16 MN
11476 Rising Tide 13-S sharks 1600 35-22 61% 13 SC
11477 XFactor VBC 18 1600 22-14 61% 18 VA
11478 TX LEGACY 12-BLACK 1600 27-17 60% 12 TX
11479 Mass Pats 15-1 determination 1600 25-16 60% 15 MA
11480 CVC 14U National 1600 35-23 60% 14 TX
11481 Spark 14-1 ari 1600 27-18 60% 14 OK
11482 Air VBC 14-Blue 1600 25-17 60% 14 WI
11483 CC Rattlers 16-1 1600 19-13 59% 16 TX
11484 AFVBC 14-Everest 1600 27-19 59% 14 CA
11485 The St. James 16 Navy 1600 36-24 59% 16 VA
11486 Emerald Coast 14-National - india 1600 7-5 58% 14 FL
11487 LV FORCE VB 17-1 1600 4-3 57% 17 PA
11488 JJVA Club 16-A 1600 13-10 57% 16 FL
11489 Dive 15-Blue 1600 29-22 57% 15 CO
11490 Renaissance 14-Black 1600 37-29 56% 14 PA
11491 Triangle 12-Blue 1600 24-19 56% 12 NC
11492 NPJ Seattle 14-Black 1600 47-39 55% 14 WA
11493 Fulmont VBC 15-1 1600 21-10 53% 15 NY
11494 Caswell Quest 13 1600 11-10 52% 13 NC
11495 NYC Juniors 17-Travel 1600 24-25 49% 17 NY
11496 H2 13-2 longhorns 1600 18-16 49% 13 MO
11497 OVA 12-Black 1600 29-42 41% 12 FL
11498 FH 12-Ikaika-celeste 1600 19-19 41% 12 TX
11499 PC Elite 14-1 1600 2-5 29% 14 TX
11500 VCN 17-Black 1600 4-11 27% 17 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.